Use a simulation to test a model, and to compare two treatments
Grade 11 Math Worksheet

Circle the best answer, or write your answer on the line.
Kira's class tested two wing designs on 24 paper airplanes, assigned at random. The long-wing planes flew 2 feet farther on average. What share of the chance dots are at 2 or more?
Luz's class tested ruler-drop practice on 20 students, assigned at random. The practice group's mean catch distance was 3 cm shorter. What share of the chance dots are at 3 or more?
Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 (difference in mean catch distance, no practice − practice, cm, rounded to the nearest 1): -4: 1, -3: 5, -2: 17, -1: 20, 0: 24, 1: 17, 2: 10, 3: 5, 4: 1. Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 (difference in mean catch distance, no practice − practice, cm, rounded to the nearest 1): -4: 1, -3: 5, -2: 17, -1: 20, 0: 24, 1: 17, 2: 10, 3: 5, 4: 1. 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 difference in mean catch distance, no practice - practice, cm, rounded to the nearest 1 Noah's coin landed heads 15 times in 20 flips. The plot shows 100 sets of 20 with a fair coin. Is a fair coin a good model for the coin?
Dot plot of 100 sets of 20 with a fair coin; dots at each number of heads: 4: 1, 5: 1, 6: 3, 7: 8, 8: 15, 9: 16, 10: 16, 11: 15, 12: 14, 13: 5, 14: 4, 15: 2. Dot plot of 100 sets of 20 with a fair coin; dots at each number of heads: 4: 1, 5: 1, 6: 3, 7: 8, 8: 15, 9: 16, 10: 16, 11: 15, 12: 14, 13: 5, 14: 4, 15: 2. 100 sets of 20 with a fair coin 4 6 8 10 12 14 number of heads - Not a good fit: only 2 of 100 sets reached 15, so a fair coin rarely does this.
- A good fit: any result can happen by chance, even one that fair coins rarely make.
- It proves the coin is unfair.
Pia's number cube showed 7 sixes in 30 rolls. The plot shows 100 sets of 30 with a fair number cube. Is a fair number cube a good model for the number cube?
Dot plot of 100 sets of 30 with a fair number cube; dots at each number of sixes: 2: 5, 3: 16, 4: 18, 5: 18, 6: 18, 7: 14, 8: 6, 9: 5. Dot plot of 100 sets of 30 with a fair number cube; dots at each number of sixes: 2: 5, 3: 16, 4: 18, 5: 18, 6: 18, 7: 14, 8: 6, 9: 5. 100 sets of 30 with a fair number cube 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 number of sixes - A good fit: 25 of 100 sets reached 7 or more, so a fair number cube often does this.
- It proves the number cube is fair.
- Not a good fit: 7 sixes is too far from 5 for a fair number cube to reach by chance alone.
Ren's spinner with 4 equal parts landed on red 16 times in 40 spins. The plot shows 100 sets of 40 with a fair spinner. Is a fair spinner a good model for the spinner?
Dot plot of 100 sets of 40 with a fair spinner; dots at each number of reds: 4: 2, 5: 3, 6: 2, 7: 7, 8: 16, 9: 17, 10: 21, 11: 10, 12: 6, 13: 11, 14: 1, 15: 2, 16: 2. Dot plot of 100 sets of 40 with a fair spinner; dots at each number of reds: 4: 2, 5: 3, 6: 2, 7: 7, 8: 16, 9: 17, 10: 21, 11: 10, 12: 6, 13: 11, 14: 1, 15: 2, 16: 2. 100 sets of 40 with a fair spinner 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 number of reds - Not a good fit: only 2 of 100 sets reached 16, so a fair spinner rarely does this.
- A good fit: any result can happen by chance, even one that fair spinners rarely make.
- It proves the spinner is unfair.
Tala's coin landed heads 7 times in 10 flips. The plot shows 100 sets of 10 with a fair coin. Is a fair coin a good model for the coin?
Dot plot of 100 sets of 10 with a fair coin; dots at each number of heads: 1: 2, 2: 7, 3: 8, 4: 22, 5: 15, 6: 28, 7: 13, 8: 4, 9: 1. Dot plot of 100 sets of 10 with a fair coin; dots at each number of heads: 1: 2, 2: 7, 3: 8, 4: 22, 5: 15, 6: 28, 7: 13, 8: 4, 9: 1. 100 sets of 10 with a fair coin 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of heads - Not a good fit: 7 heads is too far from 5 for a fair coin to reach by chance alone.
- It proves the coin is fair.
- A good fit: 18 of 100 sets reached 7 or more, so a fair coin often does this.
Zee's class tested plant food on 20 bean plants, assigned at random. The plant-food group grew 4 cm more on average. Is the difference bigger than chance alone would make?
Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 (difference in mean growth, plant food − plain water, cm, rounded to the nearest 1): -3: 7, -2: 11, -1: 26, 0: 19, 1: 18, 2: 10, 3: 6, 4: 3. Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 (difference in mean growth, plant food − plain water, cm, rounded to the nearest 1): -3: 7, -2: 11, -1: 26, 0: 19, 1: 18, 2: 10, 3: 6, 4: 3. 100 chance deals of 20 results into two groups of 10 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 difference in mean growth, plant food - plain water, cm, rounded to the nearest 1 - Yes: it proves plant food always works.
- No: chance can make any difference.
- Yes: only 3 of 100 chance deals reached 4, so plant food likely made a difference.
Read this first
Use this
Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 24 results into two groups of 12 (difference in mean words remembered, quiet − music, words, rounded to the nearest 1): -3: 1, -2: 3, -1: 32, 0: 31, 1: 28, 2: 5.
Ari's class tested quiet versus music while studying, on 24 students assigned at random. The quiet-room group remembered 1 more word on average. Is the difference bigger than chance alone would make?
- No: it proves a quiet room makes no difference.
- No: 33 of 100 chance deals reached 1, so chance alone could explain it.
- Yes: the quiet-room group did better, so a quiet room works for students.
Bo's class tested ruler-drop practice on 20 students, assigned at random. The practice group's mean catch distance was 4 cm shorter. Is the difference bigger than chance alone would make?
Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 (difference in mean catch distance, no practice − practice, cm, rounded to the nearest 1): -3: 4, -2: 13, -1: 21, 0: 21, 1: 24, 2: 10, 3: 6, 4: 1. Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 20 results into two groups of 10 (difference in mean catch distance, no practice − practice, cm, rounded to the nearest 1): -3: 4, -2: 13, -1: 21, 0: 21, 1: 24, 2: 10, 3: 6, 4: 1. 100 chance deals of 20 results into two groups of 10 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 difference in mean catch distance, no practice - practice, cm, rounded to nearest 1 - Yes: it proves practice always works.
- Yes: only 1 of 100 chance deals reached 4, so practice likely made a difference.
- No: chance can make any difference.
Use this
Dot plot of 100 chance deals of the 24 results into two groups of 12 (difference in mean flight distance, long wings − short wings, feet, rounded to the nearest 1): -2: 6, -1: 18, 0: 37, 1: 29, 2: 9, 3: 1.
Esme's class tested two wing designs on 24 paper airplanes, assigned at random. The long-wing planes flew 1 foot farther on average. Is the difference bigger than chance alone would make?
- No: it proves the long-wing design makes no difference.
- No: 39 of 100 chance deals reached 1, so chance alone could explain it.
- Yes: the long-wing planes did better, so the long-wing design works better.