How people affect biodiversity

Grade 9 Science Worksheet

NameDate

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Fish stocks with a known status, end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    liststocks with a known statusstocks flagged
    overfishing36421
    overfished26347
  2. Ari reads the NOAA table. Which list flagged the larger share of the stocks with a known status?

    • Overfished: 17.9% (47 of 263) against 5.8% (21 of 364), about 3 times as large
    • Overfished: 47 stocks against 21, about 2 times as large, since the counts decide the answer
    • Overfishing: 21 of 364 is 5.8%, which is larger than 47 of 263
    • Both flag about the same share: 47 of 506 and 21 of 506
  3. Threatened species worldwide (real data, IPBES 2019)

    measurevalue
    animal and plant species threatened with extinctionaround 1 million
    estimated animal and plant species on Earth8 million
  4. Bo applies the global share to a model park with 2,400 species. About how many would be threatened at the same share?

    • About 240, from a share of 10%
    • About 3, from 0.125% of 2,400
    • About 2,100, the share that is not threatened
    • About 300: 1 million of 8 million is 12.5%, and 12.5% of 2,400 is 300
  5. Species lost from one wetland, by driver (model data)

    driverspecies lost where it acted
    habitat loss14
    invasive species9
    pollution7
    total species lost20
  6. Esme reads the wetland table. Why do the driver counts add to more than 20, and what is the best reading?

    • Some species had more than one driver, so the counts overlap and cannot be added
    • The total should be 30, so 10 lost species were left out
    • The table has an error, because each species lost has a single cause
    • Habitat loss was the main cause: 14 of the 20 species lost is 70%, the largest share
  7. Plant species in two woodland patches (model data)

    patchspecies beforespecies after
    control (kept whole)5047
    cleared in part5035
  8. Jun reads the table. How many percent points more of its species did the cleared patch lose than the control?

    • 12 points: 15 lost minus 3 lost
    • 37 points: 15 of 35 is 43%, minus 6%
    • 30 points: the cleared patch's loss on its own, without taking away what the control lost
    • 24 points: 30% of the cleared patch's species were lost, against 6% in the control
  9. Pesticide level in one model stream after a ban (model data)

    year after the banlevel (parts per billion)
    024
    312
    66
  10. Kira reads the table. What is the level at year 9, and by what percent did it fall from year 0?

    • 0 parts per billion, since a ban removes the pesticide
    • 1.5 parts per billion, a fall of 93.75%
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 87.5%, since it halves every 3 years
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 12.5%
  11. Two sites on one model stream (model data)

    sitewater looksnitrate (milligrams per liter)limit (milligrams per liter)
    site 1 (upstream)clear410
    site 2 (downstream)clear1010
  12. Luz reads the table. By what percent did nitrate rise downstream, and is it over the limit?

    • 150%, and the reading is over the limit since it is 6 higher
    • 150%, and the reading is at the limit, not over it
    • 60%, and the reading is over the limit
    • 0%, since the water looks clear at both sites
  13. Noah reads the graph. Which statement describes stream A and predicts its level at year 8?

    • Stream B also falls, to about 12 parts per billion by year 8
    • Stream A reaches 0 by year 8, because the ban stopped the pollutant from entering the stream
    • Stream A falls 3 every 2 years, so it reaches 0 at year 8
    • Stream A halves every 2 years, so it should be about 1.5 parts per billion at year 8
  14. Pia reads the graph. Which statement does it support about the stock after year 10?

    • It rebuilt by about 4 thousand tonnes a year, rising back above the line by year 15
    • It rebuilt by about 40 thousand tonnes a year, the size of the line
    • It stayed above the overfished line the whole twenty years
    • It was extinct at year 10, then a new stock took over
  15. Four plans for testing the farm's pesticide (model data)

    planwhat is done
    plan Acount insects and test the pesticide at sites above and below the farm, before and after spraying
    plan Bask neighbors whether the water looks clean
    plan Ccount insects once, at one site below the farm
    plan Dtest the pesticide at one site after the insects have fallen
  16. Tala wants to test whether a farm's pesticide lowered a stream's insect count. Which plan gives the best evidence?

    • Plan A: it measures both, with sites above the farm as a comparison
    • Plan B: how clear the water looks shows whether a pesticide is present
    • Plan D: a pesticide reading after the loss shows what caused the loss
    • Plan C: a single count below the farm shows the pesticide's effect
  17. Warming and elevation (IPCC finding and a model rule)

    itemvalue
    warming, 2011–2020 compared with 1850–1900 (IPCC)1.1 °C
    model rule: air cools for each 1,000 m uphill6.5 °C
  18. Zee uses the model rule. About how far uphill must a plant move to keep the same temperature after 1.1 °C of warming?

    • About 1,100 m uphill, from 1.1 × 1,000
    • About 5.9 km uphill: 6.5 ÷ 1.1
    • About 7 m uphill: 1.1 × 6.5
    • About 170 m uphill: 1.1 ÷ 6.5 × 1,000
PencilGopencilgo.com

How people affect biodiversity

Answer Key - Grade 9 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Fish stocks with a known status, end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    liststocks with a known statusstocks flagged
    overfishing36421
    overfished26347
  2. Ari reads the NOAA table. Which list flagged the larger share of the stocks with a known status?

    • Overfished: 17.9% (47 of 263) against 5.8% (21 of 364), about 3 times as large
    • Overfished: 47 stocks against 21, about 2 times as large, since the counts decide the answer
    • Overfishing: 21 of 364 is 5.8%, which is larger than 47 of 263
    • Both flag about the same share: 47 of 506 and 21 of 506
  3. Threatened species worldwide (real data, IPBES 2019)

    measurevalue
    animal and plant species threatened with extinctionaround 1 million
    estimated animal and plant species on Earth8 million
  4. Bo applies the global share to a model park with 2,400 species. About how many would be threatened at the same share?

    • About 240, from a share of 10%
    • About 3, from 0.125% of 2,400
    • About 2,100, the share that is not threatened
    • About 300: 1 million of 8 million is 12.5%, and 12.5% of 2,400 is 300
  5. Species lost from one wetland, by driver (model data)

    driverspecies lost where it acted
    habitat loss14
    invasive species9
    pollution7
    total species lost20
  6. Esme reads the wetland table. Why do the driver counts add to more than 20, and what is the best reading?

    • Some species had more than one driver, so the counts overlap and cannot be added
    • The total should be 30, so 10 lost species were left out
    • The table has an error, because each species lost has a single cause
    • Habitat loss was the main cause: 14 of the 20 species lost is 70%, the largest share
  7. Plant species in two woodland patches (model data)

    patchspecies beforespecies after
    control (kept whole)5047
    cleared in part5035
  8. Jun reads the table. How many percent points more of its species did the cleared patch lose than the control?

    • 12 points: 15 lost minus 3 lost
    • 37 points: 15 of 35 is 43%, minus 6%
    • 30 points: the cleared patch's loss on its own, without taking away what the control lost
    • 24 points: 30% of the cleared patch's species were lost, against 6% in the control
  9. Pesticide level in one model stream after a ban (model data)

    year after the banlevel (parts per billion)
    024
    312
    66
  10. Kira reads the table. What is the level at year 9, and by what percent did it fall from year 0?

    • 0 parts per billion, since a ban removes the pesticide
    • 1.5 parts per billion, a fall of 93.75%
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 87.5%, since it halves every 3 years
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 12.5%
  11. Two sites on one model stream (model data)

    sitewater looksnitrate (milligrams per liter)limit (milligrams per liter)
    site 1 (upstream)clear410
    site 2 (downstream)clear1010
  12. Luz reads the table. By what percent did nitrate rise downstream, and is it over the limit?

    • 150%, and the reading is over the limit since it is 6 higher
    • 150%, and the reading is at the limit, not over it
    • 60%, and the reading is over the limit
    • 0%, since the water looks clear at both sites
  13. Noah reads the graph. Which statement describes stream A and predicts its level at year 8?

    • Stream B also falls, to about 12 parts per billion by year 8
    • Stream A reaches 0 by year 8, because the ban stopped the pollutant from entering the stream
    • Stream A falls 3 every 2 years, so it reaches 0 at year 8
    • Stream A halves every 2 years, so it should be about 1.5 parts per billion at year 8
  14. Pia reads the graph. Which statement does it support about the stock after year 10?

    • It rebuilt by about 4 thousand tonnes a year, rising back above the line by year 15
    • It rebuilt by about 40 thousand tonnes a year, the size of the line
    • It stayed above the overfished line the whole twenty years
    • It was extinct at year 10, then a new stock took over
  15. Four plans for testing the farm's pesticide (model data)

    planwhat is done
    plan Acount insects and test the pesticide at sites above and below the farm, before and after spraying
    plan Bask neighbors whether the water looks clean
    plan Ccount insects once, at one site below the farm
    plan Dtest the pesticide at one site after the insects have fallen
  16. Tala wants to test whether a farm's pesticide lowered a stream's insect count. Which plan gives the best evidence?

    • Plan A: it measures both, with sites above the farm as a comparison
    • Plan B: how clear the water looks shows whether a pesticide is present
    • Plan D: a pesticide reading after the loss shows what caused the loss
    • Plan C: a single count below the farm shows the pesticide's effect
  17. Warming and elevation (IPCC finding and a model rule)

    itemvalue
    warming, 2011–2020 compared with 1850–1900 (IPCC)1.1 °C
    model rule: air cools for each 1,000 m uphill6.5 °C
  18. Zee uses the model rule. About how far uphill must a plant move to keep the same temperature after 1.1 °C of warming?

    • About 1,100 m uphill, from 1.1 × 1,000
    • About 5.9 km uphill: 6.5 ÷ 1.1
    • About 7 m uphill: 1.1 × 6.5
    • About 170 m uphill: 1.1 ÷ 6.5 × 1,000