How people affect biodiversity

Grade 9 Science Worksheet

NameDate

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Fish stocks with a known status, end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    liststocks with a known statusstocks flagged
    overfishing36421
    overfished26347
  2. Ari reads the NOAA table. Which list flagged the larger share of the stocks with a known status?

    • Both flag about the same share: 47 of 506 and 21 of 506
    • Overfishing: 21 of 364 is 5.8%, which is larger than 47 of 263
    • Overfished: 17.9% (47 of 263) against 5.8% (21 of 364), about 3 times as large
    • Overfished: 47 stocks against 21, about 2 times as large, since the counts decide the answer
  3. Threatened species worldwide (real data, IPBES 2019)

    measurevalue
    animal and plant species threatened with extinctionaround 1 million
    estimated animal and plant species on Earth8 million
  4. Bo applies the global share to a model park with 2,400 species. About how many would be threatened at the same share?

    • About 2,100, the share that is not threatened
    • About 3, from 0.125% of 2,400
    • About 240, from a share of 10%
    • About 300: 1 million of 8 million is 12.5%, and 12.5% of 2,400 is 300
  5. Species lost from one wetland, by driver (model data)

    driverspecies lost where it acted
    habitat loss14
    invasive species9
    pollution7
    total species lost20
  6. Esme reads the wetland table. Why do the driver counts add to more than 20, and what is the best reading?

    • The table has an error, because each species lost has a single cause
    • The total should be 30, so 10 lost species were left out
    • Some species had more than one driver, so the counts overlap and cannot be added
    • Habitat loss was the main cause: 14 of the 20 species lost is 70%, the largest share
  7. Plant species in two woodland patches (model data)

    patchspecies beforespecies after
    control (kept whole)5047
    cleared in part5035
  8. Jun reads the table. How many percent points more of its species did the cleared patch lose than the control?

    • 12 points: 15 lost minus 3 lost
    • 37 points: 15 of 35 is 43%, minus 6%
    • 30 points: the cleared patch's loss on its own, without taking away what the control lost
    • 24 points: 30% of the cleared patch's species were lost, against 6% in the control
  9. Pesticide level in one model stream after a ban (model data)

    year after the banlevel (parts per billion)
    024
    312
    66
  10. Kira reads the table. What is the level at year 9, and by what percent did it fall from year 0?

    • 0 parts per billion, since a ban removes the pesticide
    • 1.5 parts per billion, a fall of 93.75%
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 12.5%
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 87.5%, since it halves every 3 years
  11. Two sites on one model stream (model data)

    sitewater looksnitrate (milligrams per liter)limit (milligrams per liter)
    site 1 (upstream)clear410
    site 2 (downstream)clear1010
  12. Luz reads the table. By what percent did nitrate rise downstream, and is it over the limit?

    • 150%, and the reading is at the limit, not over it
    • 60%, and the reading is over the limit
    • 150%, and the reading is over the limit since it is 6 higher
    • 0%, since the water looks clear at both sites
  13. Noah reads the graph. Which statement describes stream A and predicts its level at year 8?

    • Stream A reaches 0 by year 8, because the ban stopped the pollutant from entering the stream
    • Stream B also falls, to about 12 parts per billion by year 8
    • Stream A falls 3 every 2 years, so it reaches 0 at year 8
    • Stream A halves every 2 years, so it should be about 1.5 parts per billion at year 8
  14. Pia reads the graph. Which statement does it support about the stock after year 10?

    • It rebuilt by about 4 thousand tonnes a year, rising back above the line by year 15
    • It rebuilt by about 40 thousand tonnes a year, the size of the line
    • It stayed above the overfished line the whole twenty years
    • It was extinct at year 10, then a new stock took over
  15. Fish stock status at the end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    rowcount
    stocks or stock complexes managed506
    stocks on the overfishing list21
    stocks on the overfished list47
    stocks rebuilt since 200050
  16. Ren reads the NOAA rows. Which statement about overfished stocks do they support?

    • Recovery is possible: 50 stocks were rebuilt since 2000, though 47 were still overfished
    • Overfishing has ended, since just 21 of 506 stocks are on that list
    • Most managed stocks are overfished, since 47 is more than 21
    • The 47 overfished stocks are gone for good, since stocks that small do not come back after that
  17. Warming and elevation (IPCC finding and a model rule)

    itemvalue
    warming, 2011–2020 compared with 1850–1900 (IPCC)1.1 °C
    model rule: air cools for each 1,000 m uphill6.5 °C
  18. Zee uses the model rule. About how far uphill must a plant move to keep the same temperature after 1.1 °C of warming?

    • About 5.9 km uphill: 6.5 ÷ 1.1
    • About 7 m uphill: 1.1 × 6.5
    • About 170 m uphill: 1.1 ÷ 6.5 × 1,000
    • About 1,100 m uphill, from 1.1 × 1,000
PencilGopencilgo.com

How people affect biodiversity

Answer Key - Grade 9 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Fish stocks with a known status, end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    liststocks with a known statusstocks flagged
    overfishing36421
    overfished26347
  2. Ari reads the NOAA table. Which list flagged the larger share of the stocks with a known status?

    • Both flag about the same share: 47 of 506 and 21 of 506
    • Overfishing: 21 of 364 is 5.8%, which is larger than 47 of 263
    • Overfished: 17.9% (47 of 263) against 5.8% (21 of 364), about 3 times as large
    • Overfished: 47 stocks against 21, about 2 times as large, since the counts decide the answer
  3. Threatened species worldwide (real data, IPBES 2019)

    measurevalue
    animal and plant species threatened with extinctionaround 1 million
    estimated animal and plant species on Earth8 million
  4. Bo applies the global share to a model park with 2,400 species. About how many would be threatened at the same share?

    • About 2,100, the share that is not threatened
    • About 3, from 0.125% of 2,400
    • About 240, from a share of 10%
    • About 300: 1 million of 8 million is 12.5%, and 12.5% of 2,400 is 300
  5. Species lost from one wetland, by driver (model data)

    driverspecies lost where it acted
    habitat loss14
    invasive species9
    pollution7
    total species lost20
  6. Esme reads the wetland table. Why do the driver counts add to more than 20, and what is the best reading?

    • The table has an error, because each species lost has a single cause
    • The total should be 30, so 10 lost species were left out
    • Some species had more than one driver, so the counts overlap and cannot be added
    • Habitat loss was the main cause: 14 of the 20 species lost is 70%, the largest share
  7. Plant species in two woodland patches (model data)

    patchspecies beforespecies after
    control (kept whole)5047
    cleared in part5035
  8. Jun reads the table. How many percent points more of its species did the cleared patch lose than the control?

    • 12 points: 15 lost minus 3 lost
    • 37 points: 15 of 35 is 43%, minus 6%
    • 30 points: the cleared patch's loss on its own, without taking away what the control lost
    • 24 points: 30% of the cleared patch's species were lost, against 6% in the control
  9. Pesticide level in one model stream after a ban (model data)

    year after the banlevel (parts per billion)
    024
    312
    66
  10. Kira reads the table. What is the level at year 9, and by what percent did it fall from year 0?

    • 0 parts per billion, since a ban removes the pesticide
    • 1.5 parts per billion, a fall of 93.75%
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 12.5%
    • 3 parts per billion, a fall of 87.5%, since it halves every 3 years
  11. Two sites on one model stream (model data)

    sitewater looksnitrate (milligrams per liter)limit (milligrams per liter)
    site 1 (upstream)clear410
    site 2 (downstream)clear1010
  12. Luz reads the table. By what percent did nitrate rise downstream, and is it over the limit?

    • 150%, and the reading is at the limit, not over it
    • 60%, and the reading is over the limit
    • 150%, and the reading is over the limit since it is 6 higher
    • 0%, since the water looks clear at both sites
  13. Noah reads the graph. Which statement describes stream A and predicts its level at year 8?

    • Stream A reaches 0 by year 8, because the ban stopped the pollutant from entering the stream
    • Stream B also falls, to about 12 parts per billion by year 8
    • Stream A falls 3 every 2 years, so it reaches 0 at year 8
    • Stream A halves every 2 years, so it should be about 1.5 parts per billion at year 8
  14. Pia reads the graph. Which statement does it support about the stock after year 10?

    • It rebuilt by about 4 thousand tonnes a year, rising back above the line by year 15
    • It rebuilt by about 40 thousand tonnes a year, the size of the line
    • It stayed above the overfished line the whole twenty years
    • It was extinct at year 10, then a new stock took over
  15. Fish stock status at the end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    rowcount
    stocks or stock complexes managed506
    stocks on the overfishing list21
    stocks on the overfished list47
    stocks rebuilt since 200050
  16. Ren reads the NOAA rows. Which statement about overfished stocks do they support?

    • Recovery is possible: 50 stocks were rebuilt since 2000, though 47 were still overfished
    • Overfishing has ended, since just 21 of 506 stocks are on that list
    • Most managed stocks are overfished, since 47 is more than 21
    • The 47 overfished stocks are gone for good, since stocks that small do not come back after that
  17. Warming and elevation (IPCC finding and a model rule)

    itemvalue
    warming, 2011–2020 compared with 1850–1900 (IPCC)1.1 °C
    model rule: air cools for each 1,000 m uphill6.5 °C
  18. Zee uses the model rule. About how far uphill must a plant move to keep the same temperature after 1.1 °C of warming?

    • About 5.9 km uphill: 6.5 ÷ 1.1
    • About 7 m uphill: 1.1 × 6.5
    • About 170 m uphill: 1.1 ÷ 6.5 × 1,000
    • About 1,100 m uphill, from 1.1 × 1,000