How people affect biodiversity

Grade 9 Science Worksheet

NameDate

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Fish stocks with a known status, end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    liststocks with a known statusstocks flagged
    overfishing36421
    overfished26347
  2. Ari reads the NOAA table. Which list flagged the larger share of the stocks with a known status?

    • Both flag about the same share: 47 of 506 and 21 of 506
    • Overfishing: 21 of 364 is 5.8%, which is larger than 47 of 263
    • Overfished: 17.9% (47 of 263) against 5.8% (21 of 364), about 3 times as large
    • Overfished: 47 stocks against 21, about 2 times as large, since the counts decide the answer
  3. Threatened species worldwide (real data, IPBES 2019)

    measurevalue
    animal and plant species threatened with extinctionaround 1 million
    estimated animal and plant species on Earth8 million
  4. Bo applies the global share to a model park with 2,400 species. About how many would be threatened at the same share?

    • About 240, from a share of 10%
    • About 2,100, the share that is not threatened
    • About 3, from 0.125% of 2,400
    • About 300: 1 million of 8 million is 12.5%, and 12.5% of 2,400 is 300
  5. Species lost from one wetland, by driver (model data)

    driverspecies lost where it acted
    habitat loss14
    invasive species9
    pollution7
    total species lost20
  6. Esme reads the wetland table. Why do the driver counts add to more than 20, and what is the best reading?

    • The table has an error, because each species lost has a single cause
    • The total should be 30, so 10 lost species were left out
    • Habitat loss was the main cause: 14 of the 20 species lost is 70%, the largest share
    • Some species had more than one driver, so the counts overlap and cannot be added
  7. Plant species in two woodland patches (model data)

    patchspecies beforespecies after
    control (kept whole)5047
    cleared in part5035
  8. Jun reads the table. How many percent points more of its species did the cleared patch lose than the control?

    • 37 points: 15 of 35 is 43%, minus 6%
    • 24 points: 30% of the cleared patch's species were lost, against 6% in the control
    • 30 points: the cleared patch's loss on its own, without taking away what the control lost
    • 12 points: 15 lost minus 3 lost
  9. Three model rivers (model data)

    riverdriver actingplant species beforeplant species after
    river 1a dam4034
    river 2a pesticide4036
    river 3a dam and a pesticide4027
  10. Milo reads the table. Which statement does the evidence support?

    • The pesticide has no effect, since river 2 lost just 4 of 40
    • The effects simply add, since 6 + 4 is close to 13
    • Both drivers matter: rivers 1 and 2 lost 6 and 4, but the river with both lost 13
    • The dam is the one cause, since both rivers with a dam lost more species than river 2
  11. Noah reads the graph. Which statement describes stream A and predicts its level at year 8?

    • Stream A halves every 2 years, so it should be about 1.5 parts per billion at year 8
    • Stream A falls 3 every 2 years, so it reaches 0 at year 8
    • Stream A reaches 0 by year 8, because the ban stopped the pollutant from entering the stream
    • Stream B also falls, to about 12 parts per billion by year 8
  12. Pia reads the graph. Which statement does it support about the stock after year 10?

    • It rebuilt by about 4 thousand tonnes a year, rising back above the line by year 15
    • It was extinct at year 10, then a new stock took over
    • It rebuilt by about 40 thousand tonnes a year, the size of the line
    • It stayed above the overfished line the whole twenty years
  13. Fish stock status at the end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    rowcount
    stocks or stock complexes managed506
    stocks on the overfishing list21
    stocks on the overfished list47
    stocks rebuilt since 200050
  14. Ren reads the NOAA rows. Which statement about overfished stocks do they support?

    • Overfishing has ended, since just 21 of 506 stocks are on that list
    • Most managed stocks are overfished, since 47 is more than 21
    • The 47 overfished stocks are gone for good, since stocks that small do not come back after that
    • Recovery is possible: 50 stocks were rebuilt since 2000, though 47 were still overfished
  15. Four plans for testing the farm's pesticide (model data)

    planwhat is done
    plan Acount insects and test the pesticide at sites above and below the farm, before and after spraying
    plan Bask neighbors whether the water looks clean
    plan Ccount insects once, at one site below the farm
    plan Dtest the pesticide at one site after the insects have fallen
  16. Tala wants to test whether a farm's pesticide lowered a stream's insect count. Which plan gives the best evidence?

    • Plan A: it measures both, with sites above the farm as a comparison
    • Plan C: a single count below the farm shows the pesticide's effect
    • Plan D: a pesticide reading after the loss shows what caused the loss
    • Plan B: how clear the water looks shows whether a pesticide is present
  17. Warming and elevation (IPCC finding and a model rule)

    itemvalue
    warming, 2011–2020 compared with 1850–1900 (IPCC)1.1 °C
    model rule: air cools for each 1,000 m uphill6.5 °C
  18. Zee uses the model rule. About how far uphill must a plant move to keep the same temperature after 1.1 °C of warming?

    • About 7 m uphill: 1.1 × 6.5
    • About 5.9 km uphill: 6.5 ÷ 1.1
    • About 170 m uphill: 1.1 ÷ 6.5 × 1,000
    • About 1,100 m uphill, from 1.1 × 1,000
PencilGopencilgo.com

How people affect biodiversity

Answer Key - Grade 9 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Fish stocks with a known status, end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    liststocks with a known statusstocks flagged
    overfishing36421
    overfished26347
  2. Ari reads the NOAA table. Which list flagged the larger share of the stocks with a known status?

    • Both flag about the same share: 47 of 506 and 21 of 506
    • Overfishing: 21 of 364 is 5.8%, which is larger than 47 of 263
    • Overfished: 17.9% (47 of 263) against 5.8% (21 of 364), about 3 times as large
    • Overfished: 47 stocks against 21, about 2 times as large, since the counts decide the answer
  3. Threatened species worldwide (real data, IPBES 2019)

    measurevalue
    animal and plant species threatened with extinctionaround 1 million
    estimated animal and plant species on Earth8 million
  4. Bo applies the global share to a model park with 2,400 species. About how many would be threatened at the same share?

    • About 240, from a share of 10%
    • About 2,100, the share that is not threatened
    • About 3, from 0.125% of 2,400
    • About 300: 1 million of 8 million is 12.5%, and 12.5% of 2,400 is 300
  5. Species lost from one wetland, by driver (model data)

    driverspecies lost where it acted
    habitat loss14
    invasive species9
    pollution7
    total species lost20
  6. Esme reads the wetland table. Why do the driver counts add to more than 20, and what is the best reading?

    • The table has an error, because each species lost has a single cause
    • The total should be 30, so 10 lost species were left out
    • Habitat loss was the main cause: 14 of the 20 species lost is 70%, the largest share
    • Some species had more than one driver, so the counts overlap and cannot be added
  7. Plant species in two woodland patches (model data)

    patchspecies beforespecies after
    control (kept whole)5047
    cleared in part5035
  8. Jun reads the table. How many percent points more of its species did the cleared patch lose than the control?

    • 37 points: 15 of 35 is 43%, minus 6%
    • 24 points: 30% of the cleared patch's species were lost, against 6% in the control
    • 30 points: the cleared patch's loss on its own, without taking away what the control lost
    • 12 points: 15 lost minus 3 lost
  9. Three model rivers (model data)

    riverdriver actingplant species beforeplant species after
    river 1a dam4034
    river 2a pesticide4036
    river 3a dam and a pesticide4027
  10. Milo reads the table. Which statement does the evidence support?

    • The pesticide has no effect, since river 2 lost just 4 of 40
    • The effects simply add, since 6 + 4 is close to 13
    • Both drivers matter: rivers 1 and 2 lost 6 and 4, but the river with both lost 13
    • The dam is the one cause, since both rivers with a dam lost more species than river 2
  11. Noah reads the graph. Which statement describes stream A and predicts its level at year 8?

    • Stream A halves every 2 years, so it should be about 1.5 parts per billion at year 8
    • Stream A falls 3 every 2 years, so it reaches 0 at year 8
    • Stream A reaches 0 by year 8, because the ban stopped the pollutant from entering the stream
    • Stream B also falls, to about 12 parts per billion by year 8
  12. Pia reads the graph. Which statement does it support about the stock after year 10?

    • It rebuilt by about 4 thousand tonnes a year, rising back above the line by year 15
    • It was extinct at year 10, then a new stock took over
    • It rebuilt by about 40 thousand tonnes a year, the size of the line
    • It stayed above the overfished line the whole twenty years
  13. Fish stock status at the end of 2023 (real data, NOAA Fisheries, 2023)

    rowcount
    stocks or stock complexes managed506
    stocks on the overfishing list21
    stocks on the overfished list47
    stocks rebuilt since 200050
  14. Ren reads the NOAA rows. Which statement about overfished stocks do they support?

    • Overfishing has ended, since just 21 of 506 stocks are on that list
    • Most managed stocks are overfished, since 47 is more than 21
    • The 47 overfished stocks are gone for good, since stocks that small do not come back after that
    • Recovery is possible: 50 stocks were rebuilt since 2000, though 47 were still overfished
  15. Four plans for testing the farm's pesticide (model data)

    planwhat is done
    plan Acount insects and test the pesticide at sites above and below the farm, before and after spraying
    plan Bask neighbors whether the water looks clean
    plan Ccount insects once, at one site below the farm
    plan Dtest the pesticide at one site after the insects have fallen
  16. Tala wants to test whether a farm's pesticide lowered a stream's insect count. Which plan gives the best evidence?

    • Plan A: it measures both, with sites above the farm as a comparison
    • Plan C: a single count below the farm shows the pesticide's effect
    • Plan D: a pesticide reading after the loss shows what caused the loss
    • Plan B: how clear the water looks shows whether a pesticide is present
  17. Warming and elevation (IPCC finding and a model rule)

    itemvalue
    warming, 2011–2020 compared with 1850–1900 (IPCC)1.1 °C
    model rule: air cools for each 1,000 m uphill6.5 °C
  18. Zee uses the model rule. About how far uphill must a plant move to keep the same temperature after 1.1 °C of warming?

    • About 7 m uphill: 1.1 × 6.5
    • About 5.9 km uphill: 6.5 ÷ 1.1
    • About 170 m uphill: 1.1 ÷ 6.5 × 1,000
    • About 1,100 m uphill, from 1.1 × 1,000