How people affect biodiversity
Grade 9 Science Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
One woodland over ten years (model data)
cause evidence land cleared for houses 30 hectares before, 12 hectares after a vine from another continent covers 5 hectares of the ground a water test for a pesticide none found Ari reads the woodland table. Which drivers of biodiversity loss have evidence here?
- An invasive species alone, since the vine is the one living cause
- Habitat loss alone, since 18 hectares is the largest change
- Habitat loss and an invasive species have evidence; pollution does not
- Habitat loss and pollution, since the three rows each name a driver
Direct drivers of change in nature, ranked by global impact so far (real data, IPBES 2019)
rank driver 1 changes in land and sea use 2 direct exploitation of organisms 3 climate change 4 pollution 5 invasive alien species Bo reads the ranking. Which statement does the table support?
- Land and sea use changes have had the largest global impact so far; climate change ranks third
- Invasive alien species rank first, since they spread the fastest
- Climate change has had the largest global impact so far, since its warming reaches the whole planet
- The top driver explains the loss, so drivers 2 to 5 can be set aside
DDT after the 1972 cancellation (real facts, US EPA)
when what the EPA states 1972 the EPA issued a cancellation order for DDT because of its effects on wildlife after US use stopped levels in the environment and in animals have gone down still today residues from past use remain, because DDT lasts a long time in the environment Kira reads the card about DDT. What does it say happened after DDT use stopped in the United States?
- Levels fell to 0 as soon as the order was issued
- Levels went up, because DDT lasts a long time
- Residues were gone, because the soil and water looked clean
- Levels went down, but residues from past use remain
Tests at four sites on a model stream (model data)
site water looks pesticide level (parts per billion) limit (parts per billion) site 1 clear 2 5 site 2 cloudy 0 5 site 3 clear 9 5 site 4 cloudy 4 5 Luz reads the table. Which sites go over the pesticide limit?
- Sites 1 and 3: clear water hides pollution, so both are over
- Site 4: 4 is the highest reading among the cloudy sites
- Only site 3: 9 is above the limit of 5, though the water looks clear
- Sites 2 and 4: cloudy water shows the pollution
Milo reads the graph. By year 4, what share of patch B's original species was lost?
- 16%: the 16 species lost
- 32%: 16 of 50 species
- 34%: the 34 species left
- 68%: the 34 species that were left
Noah reads the graph. About how far uphill did the highest plant move each decade, and what fits the pattern?
Highest elevation where one plant species was found on a mountain over 40 years (the air warmed over the same years) (model data). Time (years) across, 0 to 40, a mark every 10. Highest elevation (meters) up, 700 to 1000, a mark every 100. The line "Plant species" joins (0, 800), (10, 830), (20, 870), (30, 920), (40, 960) with straight pieces. Highest elevation where one plant species was found on a mountain over 40 years (the air warmed over the same years) (model data). Time (years) across, 0 to 40, a mark every 10. Highest elevation (meters) up, 700 to 1000, a mark every 100. The line "Plant species" joins (0, 800), (10, 830), (20, 870), (30, 920), (40, 960) with straight pieces. 0 10 20 30 40 700 800 900 1000 Time (years) Highest elevation (meters) Plant species - About 4 m a decade, the rise each year
- No shift, since the plant stayed near 800 m
- About 160 m a decade, the whole rise counted as if it happened in one decade
- About 40 m a decade, fitting a range that shifts upslope as the air warms
Pia reads the graph. What does it show about the pesticide level after the ban?
Pesticide level in stream water after a ban (model data). Time since the ban (years) across, 0 to 8, a mark every 2. Pesticide level (parts per billion) up, 0 to 16, a mark every 4. The line "Stream water" joins (0, 16), (2, 8), (4, 4), (6, 2), (8, 1) with straight pieces. Pesticide level in stream water after a ban (model data). Time since the ban (years) across, 0 to 8, a mark every 2. Pesticide level (parts per billion) up, 0 to 16, a mark every 4. The line "Stream water" joins (0, 16), (2, 8), (4, 4), (6, 2), (8, 1) with straight pieces. 0 2 4 6 8 0 4 8 12 16 Time since the ban (years) Pesticide level (parts per billion) Stream water - It fell by 4 every 2 years and reached 0 by year 8
- It reached 0 as soon as the ban began
- It halved every 2 years and was still above 0 at year 8
- It fell by the same amount each year
The zebra mussel (real data, USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species)
fact entry native range Black, Caspian and Azov Seas likely route to the Great Lakes a cargo ship's ballast water found today in all of the Great Lakes Ren reads the zebra mussel card. Which statement is supported?
- It is invasive in the Black Sea, since it arrived there from the Great Lakes by ship
- It is native to the Great Lakes, since it is found in each of them today
- It is native to ships' ballast water, which carried it to the lakes
- It is native to the Black, Caspian and Azov Seas and is invasive in the Great Lakes
Kudzu in the United States (real data, from OpenStax Biology 2e)
fact entry native to Japan brought to the United States 1876 later use planted to protect soil area covered in the southeast over 7 million acres Tala reads the kudzu card. Kudzu was planted on purpose to protect soil. Why is it called invasive?
- It is native to the southeast, where it covers over 7 million acres
- A species counts as invasive if it arrives by accident, and kudzu was planted on purpose
- It is native to Japan and now spreads over more than 7 million acres of the southeast
- It was brought in 1876, which is too long ago to be called invasive
Cane toads in Australia (real data, Australian Museum)
fact entry toads brought from Hawaii about 100 toads released in north Queensland in July 1935 more than 3,000 reason for the release to control cane beetles range since then much of northern Australia Zee reads the cane toad card. Which statement does the card support?
- More than 3,000 toads were brought from Hawaii in 1935
- About 100 toads became 3,000 released in 1935, and the range now covers much of the north
- Cane toads are native to northern Australia, which is why they live across so much of it today
- The release controlled the beetles, so the toads stayed in the cane fields