Tell a hypothesis, a theory and a law apart
Grade 9 Science Worksheet
Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Meat jars in a Redi-style test (example data)
jar treatment maggots on the meat? jar 1 open, so flies land on the meat yes jar 2 covered with gauze, so flies land on the gauze no jar 3 sealed, so no fly reaches the meat no Ari reads a test of the idea that flies' eggs, not rotting meat, give rise to maggots. Which result would have falsified that idea?
- Maggots appearing on the meat in the open jar, where flies land on it freely
- No maggots on the meat in the sealed jar, even after several days of warm weather
- Maggots appearing on the meat in a sealed jar that no fly could reach
- Flies laying eggs on the gauze while the meat under it stays free of maggots
Mendel's seed color counts (real data, Mendel 1866)
seed color seeds counted yellow 6,022 green 2,001 total 8,023 Esme reads Mendel's counts. The law of segregation predicts a 3:1 ratio. Do 2,001 green seeds support it?
- Yes: a 3:1 ratio predicts about 2,006 green seeds, and 2,001 is very close
- No: the law needs exactly 2,006 green seeds, so 2,001 disproves it
- Yes: 6,022 ÷ 2,001 is exactly 3, so the match is perfect
- No: a 3:1 ratio predicts about 2,674 green seeds, which is 8,023 ÷ 3, so 2,001 is too few
Predictions of cell theory and what was found (real data, from OpenStax Microbiology)
prediction test result every living tissue is made of cells cork in 1665, plants in 1838, animals in 1839 cells found in each new cells come from existing cells dividing cells watched and described by 1855 cells seen arising from cells Kira reads how cell theory was tested. Why is it more than a guess?
- It is called a theory because not every cell has been seen, so it stays a guess until then
- It has been confirmed so many times that it moved up from a theory to a law
- It fits cork, so it fits every tissue, and one example is enough to settle it
- Predictions about cork, plants, animals and dividing cells could have failed, and none did
Four experiments (example data)
experiment what is done what is measured 1 cap the tip with foil, light from one side bending of the stem 2 grow seedlings in two soils, light from one side height after a week 3 grow seedlings in the dark height after a week 4 shine light on seedlings and count leaves leaves after a week Luz tests: "A seedling's tip senses light and signals the stem to bend toward it." Which experiment tests it better?
- Experiment 4: light matters most, and counting leaves gives the largest sample
- Experiment 3: seedlings in the dark show what a seedling does without any light at all
- Experiment 2: soil type is the best variable to change, and it measures growth
- Experiment 1: it changes only whether the tip sees light, and bending could fail to appear
Mendel's second-generation counts (real data, Mendel 1866)
trait dominant recessive ratio flower color 705 224 3.15 : 1 seed shape 5,474 1,850 2.96 : 1 seed color 6,022 2,001 3.01 : 1 Statement L: each egg or pollen cell gets one of the two copies of a gene. Statement C: paired chromosomes separate when eggs and pollen form, carrying the copies apart.
Milo reads Mendel's three crosses. Which labels fit statement L, about the copies, and statement C, about chromosomes?
- L is the law: it describes the rule behind all three ratios; C is the theory that explains it
- Both are theories, since each covers more than a single cross
- L is the theory and C is the law, because the copies rule explains the counts
- Both are laws, since both fit the three ratios in the table above equally
Heart rates of three mammals (example data, rounded from typical values)
animal body mass (kg) resting heart rate (beats a minute) mouse 0.02 600 human 70 70 elephant 4,000 30 Statement A: resting heart rate falls as body mass rises. Statement B: a small body loses heat faster for its mass, so its cells need fuel delivered faster.
Noah reads the table and two statements. Which statement describes a pattern, and which explains it?
- Both describe patterns, since both mention heart rate or body mass
- A is a theory, since it covers three different mammals at once
- B describes the pattern in the table; A is an explanation for the heart rates
- A describes the pattern in the table; B is an explanation that more animals could test
Bacteria before one antibiotic dose (example data)
measure value cells 10,000 resistant cells 1% resistant cells that live 90% other cells that live 10% Pia uses natural selection to predict. One dose lets 90% of resistant cells and 10% of other cells live. About what share of survivors is resistant?
- 90%, the share of resistant cells that live
- 1%, because a dose does not change which cells are resistant
- 9%, from 90 survivors out of 1,000 survivors
- About 8%: 90 of the 1,080 survivors are resistant
Two-gene fly cross, 1,000 offspring (example data modeled on Morgan's findings)
offspring type expected if genes assort independently observed parent type 1 250 415 parent type 2 250 415 new mix 1 250 85 new mix 2 250 85 A cross of two genes should give four types equally if the law of independent assortment holds. Ren sees the counts. What should happen to the law?
- It is demoted to a hypothesis, since one cross broke it
- It is revised: it still fits genes on different chromosomes; linked genes need a limit
- Nothing changes, since a law that fits most crosses is fixed and cannot be revised by one cross
- It is thrown out, since a single exception ends any law
Cell theory over time (real data, from OpenStax Microbiology)
year event 1838 Schleiden suggests new cells form like crystals 1839 Schwann finds animals are made of cells too 1855 Virchow states that cells come from existing cells Tala reads a timeline of cell theory. Which conclusion about how ideas change fits it?
- The theory was not wrong at any stage, since an explanation backed by evidence is fixed
- The first idea was a hunch, and the 1855 idea is a proven fact
- The crystal idea was a law that Virchow's evidence had to defeat
- The theory was corrected: cell division evidence replaced the crystal idea
Zee reads a website that says 10,000 more crosses matching 3 : 1 will turn the law of segregation into a theory. What is wrong?
- Nothing is wrong: a law backed by that much evidence is simply renamed a theory once it has enough
- More crosses are pointless, since a law is proven the first time it fits
- A theory is just a law that explains the same pattern in simpler words
- More crosses strengthen the law as a description; a theory explaining it is a different idea