Fast and slow change, and extinction, in the fossil record
Grade 9 Science Worksheet - Challenge Me
Circle the best answer.
Read this first
A model group of species after a mass extinction (model data)
time since the mass extinction (million years) species in the group before 100 0 12 10 40 20 70 30 100 Ari reads a model table of species after a mass extinction. How long did recovery take, and what share of the species became extinct?
- 30 million years; 88 percent
- 30 million years; 12 percent
- 100 million years; 88 percent
- 20 million years; 88 percent
A model fossil series and the water level in each layer (model data)
age (million years ago) mean shell width (mm) water level (m) 10 15 50 8 15 50 6 15 50 5 27 32 3 27 32 Bo reads a model fossil series beside a record of water level. Which claim and reason fit the table?
- Change is slow and steady everywhere; the width rose a little in each layer
- Change is instant; the width changed with no time passing between layers 6 and 5
- The species stopped evolving; its flat stretch shows that it cannot change later
- A quick change came with new conditions; the width jumped as the water level fell
Table
Species counts on a model island around a mass extinction (model data), 4 rows. Columns: time | group X species | group Y species. Row 1: before | 6 | 1. Row 2: just after | 0 | 1. Row 3: 5 million years later | 0 | 4. Row 4: 10 million years later | 0 | 9.
Esme reads a model table for an island around a mass extinction. Which statement fits group X and group Y?
- Group X recovered to 6 species, while group Y stayed at one species
- Group Y became extinct, and group X branched from one species into 9
- Group X became extinct, and group Y branched from one species into 9
- Both groups became extinct, so the 9 species of group Y must be a mistake
Notes on the end-Ordovician extinction (real data from Biology 2e)
topic note number of events two events about 1 million years apart recovery of biodiversity 5 to 20 million years, depending on location Kira reads notes on the end-Ordovician extinction. Why might recovery have taken from 5 to 20 million years?
- It depended on location, so some places recovered more quickly than others
- The two events were 5 to 20 million years apart, so the times differ
- One extinction has one recovery time, so the range must be a mistake
- Life ended in some places, so those places took 20 million years to start again
How three mass extinctions are described (real data from Biology 2e)
mass extinction how it is described Late Devonian may have unfolded across a fairly long period; causes are poorly understood end-Triassic may have unfolded gradually during the Triassic end-Cretaceous an asteroid impact is the cause understood best; one theropod line continued as birds Luz reads how three mass extinctions are described. Which statement fits the table?
- After the end-Cretaceous impact, no dinosaur line continued, so birds are unrelated to dinosaurs
- Each mass extinction ended life on Earth, so nothing continued after it
- The three extinctions were quick events with the same asteroid cause, one after another
- Some may have taken a long time, and the end-Cretaceous has a well-understood cause
Notebook
Notes on a model fossil series (classmate's notebook), 4 lines. Columns: line, entry. Line 1: The width stayed at 18 mm in the layers from 9 to 5 million years ago. Line 2: It then reached 30 mm in the layer at 4.5 million years ago. Line 3: So the change took 0.5 million years or less, a short time next to the stasis. Line 4: A quick change in a punctuated pattern means the species changed in an instant.
Milo reads a classmate's notebook about a model fossil series. Which line has the mistake?
- Line 4: a quick change still takes time, here up to 0.5 million years
- Line 1: a species cannot stay at one width for as long as 4 million years
- Line 2: a width cannot rise by 12 mm within as short a time as 0.5 million years
- Line 3: a change cannot be called short next to a stasis of 4 million years
Notebook
Notes on the end-Permian extinction (classmate's notebook), 4 lines. Columns: line, entry. Line 1: The end-Permian extinction was about 251 million years ago. Line 2: About 96 percent of marine species and 70 percent of land species became extinct. Line 3: So life ended completely, and the later species did not come from survivors. Line 4: Tetrapod diversity took about 30 million years to recover.
Noah reads a classmate's notebook about the end-Permian extinction. Which line has the mistake?
- Line 3: some species remained, since the shares are below 100 percent
- Line 4: a recovery cannot take as long as 30 million years to finish
- Line 1: 251 million years ago is too long ago to be a mass extinction
- Line 2: 96 percent cannot be a share of the marine species that existed
Notebook
Notes on extinction rates (classmate's notebook), 4 lines. Columns: line, entry. Line 1: The background extinction rate is about 1 extinction per million species per year. Line 2: A model group has 3 million species. Line 3: So about 3 species in the group become extinct each year at that rate. Line 4: A mass extinction has the same rate, so it is just the usual rate.
Pia reads a classmate's notebook about extinction rates. Which line has the mistake?
- Line 1: the background rate is about 1 per thousand species per year
- Line 3: 3 million species at 1 per million per year gives 6, not 3
- Line 4: in a mass extinction the rate is far above the background rate
- Line 2: a model group cannot have as many as 3 million species in it
Tala reads a model graph of the extinction rate over time. Which claim and reason fit the graph?
- A mass extinction occurred at 0 million years; the rate there was the lowest
- A mass extinction occurred near 20 million years; its rate was far above the usual rate of 1
- Background extinction is shown near 20 million years, since a rate of 8 is the usual rate
- Life ended near 20 million years; the rate fell back to 1 because no species were left
Notes on the end-Cretaceous mass extinction (real data from Biology 2e)
topic note when about 65 million years ago species lost about 75 percent dinosaurs most became extinct, but one theropod line continued as birds recovery of biodiversity on the order of 10 million years Zee reads notes on the end-Cretaceous extinction. Which claim and reason fit the notes?
- Dinosaurs became extinct about 10 million years ago; recovery took 65 million years
- Birds descend from a theropod line; that line continued through the end-Cretaceous extinction
- Dinosaurs left no descendants; most dinosaurs became extinct at the end-Cretaceous
- Life on Earth ended; about 75 percent of species became extinct at the end-Cretaceous