The evidence for the Big Bang
Grade 9 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Table, Evidence for the Big Bang (NASA, ESA), with columns Observation, What it shows
Galaxy redshifts grow with distance, space is expanding; microwave background at about 2.7 K, a hot, dense early universe; mostly hydrogen and helium, a little lithium, early element-making.
Match each observation to what it supports. Which pairing is right, by Bo's reading?
- Elements: expansion; redshifts: element-making
- Background: starlight; redshifts: galaxy color
- Redshifts: hot start; background: expansion
- Redshifts: expansion; background: hot start; elements: early element-making
Timeline with galaxies drawn closer together further back in time. If galaxies are moving apart today, what was the universe like long ago, by Esme's reading?
- Packed into one spot in empty space
- Exactly the same as today
- Closer together, hotter and denser
- Farther apart and colder
Peak = 2,898,000 nm·K ÷ temperature; 2.7 K. Using peak = 2,898,000 nm·K ÷ temperature, where does 2.7 K background light peak, by Kira's math?
- About 1 mm, in the microwaves
- About 1 km, in radio
- About 1 nm, in X-rays
- About 500 nm, in visible light
The background was found in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson (NASA). Why was it strong evidence, by Luz's reading?
- It showed the universe has stopped expanding and is now shrinking
- It showed galaxies are moving apart
- The model predicted a leftover glow, and it was found
- It was starlight from our galaxy
All-sky map of the background with tiny temperature differences. The background is nearly the same temperature in every direction, with only tiny differences (NASA). What does this suggest, by Milo's reading?
- The early universe was hot and smooth everywhere
- It shows galaxies' colors
- The universe began as a blast at one spot in space
- It comes from one nearby star
Four cards, labeled A to D. Which of these would most weaken the Big Bang model if it were found, by Pia's reading?
- A microwave glow in each direction
- A star clearly older than 13.8 billion years
- A galaxy with a large redshift
- A scientist calling the model just a theory
All-sky map of the background with tiny temperature differences. Why do the tiny temperature differences in the background matter, by Ren's reading (NASA)?
- They show where the explosion happened
- They are nearby stars
- They were seeds that grew into galaxies
- They are errors made while drawing the map
Hydrogen and helium make up nearly all the atoms in the oldest stars, which have very little iron. What does this support, by Tala's reading?
Two bars for the oldest stars: hydrogen and helium tall; iron tiny. Two bars for the oldest stars: hydrogen and helium tall; iron tiny. Two bars for the oldest stars 0 1 2 3 4 4 hydrogen and helium 0.4 iron - The first stars formed from Big Bang gas, before much iron existed
- Old stars have used up their iron
- The Big Bang made mostly iron
- The oldest stars formed first, from galaxy collisions
If the universe's 13.8 billion years were one 24-hour day, about how many hours ago did the Sun form (4.6 billion years ago), by Zee's math?
Timeline ruler: universe 13.8 billion years; Sun formed 4.6 billion years ago. Timeline ruler: universe 13.8 billion years; Sun formed 4.6 billion years ago. universe 13.8 billion years −4.6 −4.6: Sun formed 4.6 billion years ago - About 8 hours ago
- About 16 hours ago
- A few seconds ago
- About 4.6 hours ago
Three evidence lines pointing to one explanation. Three independent lines of evidence all point to the same model. Why does that matter, by Ari's reading?
- It shows the evidence pieces are the same
- Independent agreement makes the explanation much stronger
- It means the model is just a guess that has not been tested yet
- One line would be enough