The evidence for the Big Bang
Grade 9 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Table, Evidence for the Big Bang (NASA, ESA), with columns Observation, What it shows
Galaxy redshifts grow with distance, space is expanding; microwave background at about 2.7 K, a hot, dense early universe; mostly hydrogen and helium, a little lithium, early element-making.
Match each observation to what it supports. Which pairing is right, by Bo's reading?
- Redshifts: hot start; background: expansion
- Background: starlight; redshifts: galaxy color
- Redshifts: expansion; background: hot start; elements: early element-making
- Elements: expansion; redshifts: element-making
Timeline with galaxies drawn closer together further back in time. If galaxies are moving apart today, what was the universe like long ago, by Esme's reading?
- Farther apart and colder
- Exactly the same as today
- Packed into one spot in empty space
- Closer together, hotter and denser
Background temperature (NASA, ESA)
Time Temperature at release about 3,000 K today about 2.7 K The background light was about 3,000 K when released and is about 2.7 K now. By about what factor has space stretched, by Jun's math?
- About 1,100
- About 0.0009
- About 11
- About 3,003
Peak = 2,898,000 nm·K ÷ temperature; 2.7 K. Using peak = 2,898,000 nm·K ÷ temperature, where does 2.7 K background light peak, by Kira's math?
- About 500 nm, in visible light
- About 1 nm, in X-rays
- About 1 mm, in the microwaves
- About 1 km, in radio
The background was found in 1965 by Penzias and Wilson (NASA). Why was it strong evidence, by Luz's reading?
- It was starlight from our galaxy
- The model predicted a leftover glow, and it was found
- It showed the universe has stopped expanding and is now shrinking
- It showed galaxies are moving apart
As the universe expands, what happens to the background's temperature over time, by Noah's reading?
Graph sketch: background temperature against time. Graph sketch: background temperature against time. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 time background temperature - It keeps falling
- It jumps up and down each year
- It keeps rising
- It stays at 3,000 K
Four cards, labeled A to D. Which of these would most weaken the Big Bang model if it were found, by Pia's reading?
- A scientist calling the model just a theory
- A microwave glow in each direction
- A star clearly older than 13.8 billion years
- A galaxy with a large redshift
Hydrogen and helium make up nearly all the atoms in the oldest stars, which have very little iron. What does this support, by Tala's reading?
Two bars for the oldest stars: hydrogen and helium tall; iron tiny. Two bars for the oldest stars: hydrogen and helium tall; iron tiny. Two bars for the oldest stars 0 1 2 3 4 4 hydrogen and helium 0.4 iron - Old stars have used up their iron
- The first stars formed from Big Bang gas, before much iron existed
- The oldest stars formed first, from galaxy collisions
- The Big Bang made mostly iron
If the universe's 13.8 billion years were one 24-hour day, about how many hours ago did the Sun form (4.6 billion years ago), by Zee's math?
Timeline ruler: universe 13.8 billion years; Sun formed 4.6 billion years ago. Timeline ruler: universe 13.8 billion years; Sun formed 4.6 billion years ago. universe 13.8 billion years −4.6 −4.6: Sun formed 4.6 billion years ago - About 16 hours ago
- About 4.6 hours ago
- A few seconds ago
- About 8 hours ago
Three evidence lines pointing to one explanation. Three independent lines of evidence all point to the same model. Why does that matter, by Ari's reading?
- Independent agreement makes the explanation much stronger
- It means the model is just a guess that has not been tested yet
- One line would be enough
- It shows the evidence pieces are the same