People, resources and biodiversity: reading a model
Grade 9 Science Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Table, World population (UN), with columns Milestone, UN figure
8 billion reached, November 15, 2022; Time from 7 to 8 billion, about 12 years; Time from 8 to 9 billion (projected), about 15 years, to about 2037; Peak (projected), about 10.3 billion, mid-2080s; 2100 (projected), about 10.2 billion.
Ari compares the UN's 12 years from 7 to 8 billion with the projected 15 years from 8 to 9 billion. What does it show?
- Total still rises, but people added yearly fall from 83 to 67 million
- Yearly growth stays the same, at about 1 billion per 12 years
- The total will start to fall, because 15 years is longer than 12 years
- Yearly growth speeds up, because 9 billion is more than 8 billion
Bo reads the UN table for a report. Which claim does it support best?
- Population reached 10.3 billion in 2022 and has fallen since
- The UN counted 10.3 billion people alive in the mid-2080s
- The UN projects a peak near 10.3 billion, then a slight fall
- Population keeps rising after the 2080s, with no peak in sight
Esme lists two UN numbers: 8 billion in 2022 and 9 billion around 2037. Which statement about them is true?
- Both are counts, because the UN reports a number each year
- 8 billion in 2022 is counted; 9 billion near 2037 is projected
- Both are projections made by the UN in 2024, using a model
- 8 billion is a projection from a model, and 9 billion is a count
Table, Forests (FAO, 2020 assessment), with columns Measure, FAO figure
Forest area, 2020, 4.06 billion hectares (31% of land); Deforestation, 1990–2000, 16 million ha a year; Deforestation, 2015–2020, 10 million ha a year; Net forest loss, 1990–2000, 7.8 million ha a year; Net forest loss, 2000–2010, 5.2 million ha a year; Net forest loss, 2010–2020, 4.7 million ha a year; Net forest loss since 1990, 178 million ha.
FAO says net forest loss fell from 7.8 to 4.7 million ha a year. What does Jun conclude about total forest area?
- Forest area still shrank each decade, only more slowly
- Forest area has held the same since the year 2000
- Forest area grew, because net loss went down
- Forest area shrank faster in each later decade
In 1990–2000, FAO has deforestation at 16 million ha a year and net loss at 7.8. How much forest was gained each year, by Kira's subtraction?
- About 7.8 million ha a year, the net loss itself
- About 23.8 million ha a year, found by adding them
- About 0.5 million ha a year, found by dividing
- About 8.2 million ha a year gained back
Use the table
U.S. fish stocks, end of 2024 (NOAA Fisheries)
Measure Number of stocks Stocks managed 522 With a known overfishing status 372 On the overfishing list 23 On the overfished list 42 Rebuilt since 2000 51 NOAA lists 23 stocks on the overfishing list and 42 on the overfished list. Milo says they are the same stocks. Reply?
- Yes: fishing too hard puts a stock on both lists at once
- No: overfished stocks are the ones already rebuilt by NOAA
- Not necessarily: one is a catch rate, the other a low population
- Yes: both lists are smaller than the 51 rebuilt stocks
NOAA: 372 stocks have a known overfishing status, and 23 of them are subject to overfishing. What share is that for Noah?
- About 16%, found as 372 ÷ 23
- About 6%, found as 23 ÷ 372
- About 62%, found as 23 ÷ 37.2
- About 4%, found as 23 ÷ 522
Pia studies a stock caught faster than the rate that gives maximum sustainable yield, though its population is still high. Which fits?
- Overfished, but not subject to overfishing
- On the overfishing list, but not overfished
- Both overfished and subject to overfishing
- Neither one, because its population is still high
Fishery computer model output (model data)
Steady catch (thousand tons a year) Stock the model settles at (thousand tons) 40 about 890 80 about 720 100 about 500 120 falls toward 0 Note: The model starts at 1,000 thousand tons, the most the habitat holds. Each year the stock adds 0.4 × stock × (1 − stock ÷ 1,000) thousand tons.
In the model, Tala sets the catch at 120 thousand tons a year, above the table's largest steady catch. What happens to the stock?
- It settles at about 500, just like a catch of 100 would
- It rises, because a bigger catch needs a bigger stock
- It settles near 1,000, the most the habitat holds
- It falls toward zero, since the stock cannot replace 120 a year
The fishery table is computer-model output. How should Zee use it?
- To name the real stock that will collapse in the next year
- As NOAA's measured catch records for the year 2024 and later
- To compare catch levels inside the model, not as measured catches
- Not used; a model cannot be checked against anything