Sole proprietorships, partnerships, corporations, and why entrepreneurs take risks
Grade 12 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Card A. Compare chart "One year's profit of $100,000" (made up for practice, except the 21% corporate rate), columns Form | Tax on the business's profit | Tax when the owner receives the profit: Sole proprietorship | none; profit counts as the owner's income | 22% of the $100,000; Corporation | 21% of the $100,000 | 15% of the dividends paid out. Note: the 21% federal corporate rate is real. The 22% and 15% rates are assumed for this sheet and are not tax advice. A partnership works like a sole proprietorship: each partner pays 22% on a share of the profit.
Pia reads card A. If the corporation pays out all its profit as dividends, which comparison of owners' take-home pay is correct?
- Both owners keep $78,000, because 22% and 21% plus 15% are close to the same
- The sole proprietor keeps $78,000; the corporation's owner keeps $67,150 after both taxes
- The corporation's owner keeps $85,000, because a 15% rate is lower than 22%
- The corporation's owner keeps $79,000, because the corporate rate of 21% is below the 22% rate
A writer says card A shows owners should always choose a sole proprietorship because it keeps more profit. Tala tests the claim. What is the verdict?
- Shown: it keeps $78,000 against $67,150, so it is the better form for any owner of any kind of business
- Unsupported: the sole proprietorship earns more because it pays a lower rate
- Refuted: the corporation pays just 21% on its profit, less than the 22%
- Weakly supported: it keeps more of paid-out profit, but card A says nothing on risk such as debts
Two partners split the $100,000 profit 60% and 40%. Zee uses card A. How much tax does each partner pay?
- Each partner pays $11,000, which splits the $22,000 tax evenly
- Partner 1 pays $13,200 and Partner 2 pays $8,800, each at 22% of a share
- Partner 1 pays $60,000 and Partner 2 pays $40,000, the size of each share
- The partnership pays $21,000, then each partner pays 15% of a share
Use this
Card A. Compare chart "A bakery's costs" (made up for practice), columns Cakes baked | Extra cost of the next cake | Total cost, with $26 fixed: 1 | $12 | $38; 2 | $14 | $52; 3 | $16 | $68; 4 | $18 | $86; 5 | $22 | $108; 6 | $28 | $136; 7 | $36 | $172. Note: invented bakery, made up for practice. The $26 fixed cost is owed this month even if the bakery bakes nothing. Each cake sells at the market price.
Ari reads card A. The market price is $26 a cake. How many cakes should the bakery bake?
- Six: profit is still positive at six cakes, $156 of sales against $136 of cost
- Five: the 5th adds $26 for $22 more cost, but the 6th adds $26 for $28
- Seven: keep baking until total cost, $172, passes sales, $182
- Four: the 4th is the cake with the lowest average cost, $21.50
The price drops further, to $11 a cake. Esme uses card A. What should the bakery do this month?
- Bake 1 cake, because it brings $11 and that helps pay the $26 fixed cost
- Bake 2 cakes, because the 2nd costs $14, close to the $11 price
- Close for now: even the 1st cake costs $12 more to bake, above the $11 price, so baking adds to the loss
- Bake 4 cakes, because the average cost of the first four is lowest, at $21.50 a cake, so those four pay their way
A manager says a bakery should close whenever it is losing money. Jun tests this against the $20 price on card A. What is the verdict?
- Not supported: at $20 baking 4 cakes loses $6, but closing loses the $26 fixed cost
- Supported: with a loss of $6 the bakery could lose more at a lower price
- Not supported: the bakery earns $80 at a $20 price, so it makes a profit
- Supported: at $20 the bakery loses $6 on 4 cakes, and a loss is a reason to stop
Use this
Card A. Compare chart "Food trucks at a fair, per day" (made up for practice), columns Price | Buyers want now | Buyers want after new customers come | Trucks offer now | Trucks offer after new trucks arrive: $4 | 80 | 110 | 20 | 50; $5 | 70 | 100 | 40 | 70; $6 | 60 | 90 | 60 | 90; $7 | 50 | 80 | 80 | 110; $8 | 40 | 70 | 100 | 130. Note: made up for practice. The market starts where the "now" columns match. In the first move, new customers want more meals at each price. In the second move, new trucks offer more meals at each price.
Both moves on card A happen at once. Kira asks what can be said without reading the sizes. Which statement is best supported?
- Meals sold must rise; the price could rise, fall or stay the same, depending on the larger move
- Meals sold must fall, because the two moves cancel out
- The price must fall, because new trucks offer more meals at each price and buyers pay less for them
- The price must rise, because more customers want meals at each price
Luz reads the "after" columns on card A, where buyers' and trucks' quantities match. What happens to the price and meals sold?
- The price falls to $5 and meals sold rise to 70, as with new trucks alone
- The price rises to $7 and meals sold rise to 80
- The price stays at $6 while meals sold rise from 60 to 90
- The price stays at $6 and meals sold stay at 60
Suppose only the new trucks arrive and no new customers do. Milo uses card A. What happens to the price and meals sold?
- The price rises from $6 to $7 and meals sold rise from 60 to 80
- The price falls to $4 and meals sold fall to 50
- The price falls from $6 to $5 and meals sold stay at 60
- The price falls from $6 to $5 and meals sold rise from 60 to 70
A reporter says new food trucks always push prices down. Noah tests the claim with both moves on card A. What is the verdict?
- Not supported: the price rose to $7, so trucks push prices up
- Not supported: with new customers too, the price stays at $6 and 30 more meals sell
- Not supported: the number of trucks is not on the card
- Supported: new trucks lowered the price in the first move, so they do in each case