Unemployment: how it is measured and its kinds

Grade 12 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.

1. Read this first

   Use the table

   Four BLS measures of the U.S. labor market (BLS, Current Population Survey, seasonally adjusted, read Nov 14, 2026)

   Month	Unemployment rate (U-3)	Participation rate	Employment-population ratio	U-6 rate
   December 2007	5.0%	66.0%	62.7%	8.8%
   October 2009	10.0%	65.0%	58.5%	17.1%
   December 2010	9.3%	64.3%	58.3%	16.6%
   February 2020	3.5%	63.3%	61.1%	7.0%
   April 2020	14.8%	60.1%	51.2%	22.9%
   December 2021	3.9%	62.0%	59.5%	7.3%

   In our words: U-3 is the unemployed divided by the labor force. The participation rate is the labor force divided by the population aged 16 and over, and the employment-population ratio is the employed divided by that population. U-6 also counts discouraged and other marginally attached workers and people working part time who want full-time work.

2. 1.

   Ari compares October 2009 with December 2010. Which statement does the table support?

   • The labor force grew, since fewer people were unemployed and so more people were left in the labor force
   • The rate fell 0.7 point while the employment ratio slipped 0.2, so some of the fall was people leaving
   • Nothing improved in that year, since the unemployment rate was above 9 percent in both of the months
   • Jobs grew in that year, since the unemployment rate fell by 0.7 point from one month to the next
3. 2.

   Bo compares February 2020 with April 2020. Which statement does the table support?

   • The rise in unemployment must equal the fall in employment, since each job lost adds one unemployed person
   • Participation fell 3.2 points, which shows people found jobs that the survey did not count
   • Unemployment rose 11.3 points, but employment fell 9.9 and participation 3.2: some job losers left
   • The rise in unemployment overstates the job losses, since the employment ratio fell by less than the rate rose
4. 3.

   Esme compares U-6 with U-3 in December 2007 and October 2009. Which statement does the table support?

   • The gap shrank, since U-3 rose by more than U-6 rose between the two months
   • U-6 is the more accurate measure, since it is higher than U-3 in each month shown
   • The gap grew from 3.8 to 7.1 points, so more people were underemployed or marginally attached
   • U-6 was higher because it counts the same unemployed people twice, once in each of the two groups
5. 4.

   A writer says the labor market was stronger in December 2021 than in December 2007, since unemployment was lower. Jun tests it. What is the verdict?

   • Stronger: U-6 was lower in 2021, 7.3 against 8.8 percent, which settles the question
   • Not clear: unemployment was lower, 3.9 against 5.0, but so was the employment ratio, 59.5 against 62.7
   • Stronger: a lower unemployment rate means a larger share of the population held jobs in that month
   • Weaker: the employment ratio shows that 2021 was worse in most ways than 2007 on other measures

6. Long-term unemployment (BLS, Current Population Survey, seasonally adjusted, read Nov 14, 2026)

   Month	Unemployment rate	Unemployed (thousands)	Out of work 27 weeks or more (thousands)	Share out 27 weeks or more
   December 2007	5.0%	7,645	1,324	17.3%
   October 2009	10.0%	15,352	5,643	36.8%
   December 2010	9.3%	14,348	6,429	44.8%
   December 2019	3.6%	5,853	1,188	20.3%
   April 2020	14.8%	23,084	910	3.9%
   December 2021	3.9%	6,413	1,993	31.1%

   In our words: people on temporary layoff who expect to be recalled are counted as unemployed. Economists worry that long spells wear down skills and signal weakness to employers, so cyclical unemployment can linger after a recovery.

7. 5.

   In April 2020 the share out 27 weeks or more was only 3.9 percent. Kira asks what that suggests. Which is best?

   • The unemployment was structural, since a low long-term share means skills did not match jobs
   • Most of the 23.1 million had just lost jobs, many on temporary layoff, so few had been out 27 weeks
   • Few of them had looked for work, since people who search for long are counted as long-term unemployed
   • The labor market was healthy, since a low long-term share means jobs are easy to find
8. 6.

   Luz compares October 2009 with December 2010. Which statement does the table support?

   • Total unemployment and long-term unemployment both rose, since the share rose from 36.8 to 44.8 percent
   • The long-term share fell, since total unemployment fell by about a million people
   • Long-term unemployment fell along with total unemployment, from 5.6 to 5.0 million people
   • Total unemployment fell by about 1.0 million, but the number out 27 weeks or more rose by about 0.8 million
9. 7.

   Noah compares December 2019 with December 2021. Which statement does the table support?

   • The labor market was stronger in 2021, since the count of long-term unemployed rose
   • The labor markets were the same, since the two rates were within 0.3 of a point of each other
   • Rates were close, 3.6 and 3.9 percent, but the long-term share was 20.3 and 31.1 percent
   • Long-term unemployment nearly tripled, from 1,188 thousand to 1,993 thousand people

10. Marlow County's unemployment rate (example figures, made up for practice)

    Year	Unemployment rate	Natural rate
    1	4.5%	5.0%
    2	8.0%	5.0%
    3	6.5%	5.5%
    4	5.5%	5.5%

    In our words: the natural rate is frictional plus structural unemployment. Cyclical unemployment is the actual rate minus the natural rate. Full employment means no cyclical unemployment, not zero unemployment.

11. 8.

    Ren reads year 1, when the rate was 4.5 and the natural rate was 5.0. Which statement fits?

    • There was no unemployment cycle in year 1, since the economy was at full employment
    • Cyclical unemployment was -0.5 point: the rate was below the natural rate, a hot economy
    • Cyclical unemployment was 4.5 points, the whole actual rate in that year
    • Cyclical unemployment was zero, since the rate cannot fall below the natural rate in any year
12. 9.

    Tala compares year 2 with year 3. Which statement about the change is best supported?

    • Cyclical unemployment rose, since the natural rate rose and so did the share of structural unemployment
    • The natural rate rose 0.5 point, to 5.5, while cyclical unemployment fell from 3.0 to 1.0 points
    • Cyclical unemployment fell by 1.5 points, the same as the drop in the actual rate
    • The natural rate fell, since the actual rate fell from 8.0 to 6.5 percent
13. 10.

    Zee reads year 4, when both rates were 5.5. Which statement fits?

    • Cyclical unemployment was 5.5 points, since the actual rate was 5.5 percent in that year
    • Full employment: no cyclical unemployment, yet 5.5 percent of the labor force is still unemployed
    • Full employment means no one is unemployed, so year 4 still had some cyclical unemployment
    • Structural unemployment had vanished, since the actual rate matched the natural rate, which removes it