Counterexamples, "not", "and", "or", and Venn diagrams
Grade 10 Math Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Three points form a triangle unless they lie on one line. Bo claims: any three points with different x-coordinates are corners of a triangle. Which set is a counterexample?
- (1, 2), (3, 6), (5, 9)
- (0, 0), (0, 5), (3, 5)
- (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3)
- (0, 0), (4, 0), (2, 3)
The contrapositive of 'if P then Q' is 'if not Q then not P'. Statement: if a figure is a square, then it has four right angles. Esme writes the contrapositive. Which one is it?
- If a figure is not a square, then it has four right angles
- If a figure has four right angles, then it is a square
- If a figure is not a square, then it does not have four right angles
- If a figure does not have four right angles, then it is not a square
Both the statement and its converse are true. Every rhombus has perpendicular diagonals. A kite can have perpendicular diagonals. Esme proposes a definition: a quadrilateral is a rhombus if and only if its diagonals are perpendicular. Is it a good definition?
- No: a rhombus does not have perpendicular diagonals, so the statement itself is false and fails
- Yes: a definition needs just the direction that is true for rhombi, and that direction holds
- Yes: a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals, so the converse follows as well, and the definition works
- No: the converse fails, as a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is no rhombus
Read this first
Use this
The claim says every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. The negation is true exactly when the claim is false.
A student claims: every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Noah writes the negation. Which statement is it?
- Some rectangle has diagonals that are not congruent to each other
- No quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle outright
- Each rectangle has congruent diagonals, which is a known theorem
- Some quadrilateral has congruent diagonals but is not a rectangle
Ren draws a Venn diagram of quadrilaterals: rectangles and rhombi are circles inside parallelograms. Which claim does the diagram support?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares kites trapezoids - Every square is both a rectangle and a rhombus, so squares sit in the overlap
- Rectangles and rhombi share no shapes, because they are different circles
- Some rhombus is not a parallelogram, since rhombi reach outside the large circle
- Every rectangle is a rhombus, because both circles sit in the same parallelogram circle
Tala claims: every parallelogram with perpendicular diagonals is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: parallelograms contain rectangles and rhombi (overlap: squares). In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. Venn diagram: parallelograms contain rectangles and rhombi (overlap: squares). In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. rectangles rhombi parallelograms squares - False: a square has perpendicular diagonals and is not a rhombus, so the claim fails
- False: a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is not a rhombus, so the claim fails
- True: the four right triangles are congruent, so every side is congruent
- True: every quadrilateral with perpendicular diagonals is a rhombus
Zee claims: a quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Which figure is a counterexample, and why?
Venn diagram: rectangles sit inside the set of quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals, with room outside the rectangle circle. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. Venn diagram: rectangles sit inside the set of quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals, with room outside the rectangle circle. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals rectangles - A rectangle, because it has congruent diagonals
- A rhombus that is not a square, because its diagonals differ in length
- An isosceles trapezoid: congruent diagonals and no right angles
- A square, because its diagonals are perpendicular and congruent
Jun claims: no rectangle is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares - False: a square is both, so it sits in the overlap
- False: a parallelogram with unequal sides is both a rectangle and a rhombus
- True: the two circles have different names
- True: a rectangle has unequal sides, so it cannot also be a rhombus
Kira claims: everyone in Art is also in Band or Chess. Using the 50-student counts, what does the diagram show?
Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Art Band Chess 50 Art only 8 Band only 6 Chess only 5 Art and Band only 4 Art and Chess only 3 Band and Chess only 2 All three 1 Outside all circles: 21 - False: the 8 students who are in Art only break the claim
- True: 8 of Art's 16 students are in another club, which is most of them
- True: Band and Chess together have more members than Art has
- False: the 21 students in no club break the claim
Is "if not P then not Q". P: a triangle is equilateral. Q: it is equiangular. Theorem: if a triangle is equilateral, then it is equiangular. Pia writes the inverse. Which statement is it?
- If a triangle is not equiangular, then it is not equilateral
- A triangle is equilateral and it is not equiangular
- If a triangle is not equilateral, then it is not equiangular
- If a triangle is equiangular, then it is equilateral