Counterexamples, "not", "and", "or", and Venn diagrams
Grade 10 Math Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
A counterexample has perpendicular diagonals but is not a rhombus. Ari claims: if a quadrilateral's diagonals are perpendicular, it is a rhombus. Which figure is a counterexample?
- A rhombus with diagonals 6 and 8
- A 3 by 4 rectangle, whose diagonals are not perpendicular
- A square with side 4 and perpendicular diagonals
- A kite with perpendicular diagonals and sides 3, 3, 5, 5
Three points form a triangle unless they lie on one line. Bo claims: any three points with different x-coordinates are corners of a triangle. Which set is a counterexample?
- (1, 2), (3, 6), (5, 9)
- (0, 0), (4, 0), (2, 3)
- (0, 0), (0, 5), (3, 5)
- (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3)
If a quadrilateral has four equal sides, then it is a square. 'If a quadrilateral is a square, then it has four equal sides' is true. Jun tests its converse. What is correct?
- The converse is false: a rhombus with 60° and 120° angles has four equal sides
- The converse is true, because squares have four equal sides, which is what the original says
- The converse is true: a square with side 5 has four equal sides and is a square
- The converse is true, because the converse of a true statement is also true
Both the statement and its converse are true. Every rhombus has perpendicular diagonals. A kite can have perpendicular diagonals. Esme proposes a definition: a quadrilateral is a rhombus if and only if its diagonals are perpendicular. Is it a good definition?
- No: a rhombus does not have perpendicular diagonals, so the statement itself is false and fails
- Yes: a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals, so the converse follows as well, and the definition works
- Yes: a definition needs just the direction that is true for rhombi, and that direction holds
- No: the converse fails, as a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is no rhombus
Pia studies the theorem: if a quadrilateral is a parallelogram, then its opposite sides are congruent. Which statement about its converse is correct?
The converse: if both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are congruent, then it is a parallelogram. A kite has two pairs of congruent sides, but they are next to each other. The converse: if both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are congruent, then it is a parallelogram. A kite has two pairs of congruent sides, but they are next to each other. The converse: if both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are congruent, then it is a parallelogram. A kite has two pairs of congruent sides, but they are next to each other. - The converse is false, because the converse of a true theorem is a false statement
- The inverse is the one that is true, and the converse is not true here
- The converse is also true, so together they describe parallelograms
- The converse is false, because a kite has two pairs of congruent sides and is not a parallelogram
Ren draws a Venn diagram of quadrilaterals: rectangles and rhombi are circles inside parallelograms. Which claim does the diagram support?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares kites trapezoids - Every square is both a rectangle and a rhombus, so squares sit in the overlap
- Rectangles and rhombi share no shapes, because they are different circles
- Every rectangle is a rhombus, because both circles sit in the same parallelogram circle
- Some rhombus is not a parallelogram, since rhombi reach outside the large circle
Tala claims: every parallelogram with perpendicular diagonals is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: parallelograms contain rectangles and rhombi (overlap: squares). In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. Venn diagram: parallelograms contain rectangles and rhombi (overlap: squares). In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. rectangles rhombi parallelograms squares - False: a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is not a rhombus, so the claim fails
- True: the four right triangles are congruent, so every side is congruent
- True: every quadrilateral with perpendicular diagonals is a rhombus
- False: a square has perpendicular diagonals and is not a rhombus, so the claim fails
Kira claims: everyone in Art is also in Band or Chess. Using the 50-student counts, what does the diagram show?
Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Art Band Chess 50 Art only 8 Band only 6 Chess only 5 Art and Band only 4 Art and Chess only 3 Band and Chess only 2 All three 1 Outside all circles: 21 - False: the 8 students who are in Art only break the claim
- True: 8 of Art's 16 students are in another club, which is most of them
- True: Band and Chess together have more members than Art has
- False: the 21 students in no club break the claim
The negation of 'if P then Q' is 'P and not Q'. Statement: if a polygon is a hexagon, then it has 6 sides. Luz writes the negation of this statement. Which one is it?
- If a polygon is a hexagon, then it does not have 6 sides
- If a polygon has 6 sides, then it is a hexagon
- If a polygon is not a hexagon, then it does not have 6 sides
- A polygon is a hexagon and does not have 6 sides
Is "if not P then not Q". P: a triangle is equilateral. Q: it is equiangular. Theorem: if a triangle is equilateral, then it is equiangular. Pia writes the inverse. Which statement is it?
- If a triangle is not equiangular, then it is not equilateral
- If a triangle is equiangular, then it is equilateral
- A triangle is equilateral and it is not equiangular
- If a triangle is not equilateral, then it is not equiangular