Counterexamples, "not", "and", "or", and Venn diagrams
Grade 10 Math Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
The contrapositive of 'if P then Q' is 'if not Q then not P'. Statement: if a figure is a square, then it has four right angles. Esme writes the contrapositive. Which one is it?
- If a figure is not a square, then it does not have four right angles
- If a figure is not a square, then it has four right angles
- If a figure has four right angles, then it is a square
- If a figure does not have four right angles, then it is not a square
If a quadrilateral has four equal sides, then it is a square. 'If a quadrilateral is a square, then it has four equal sides' is true. Jun tests its converse. What is correct?
- The converse is true, because the converse of a true statement is also true
- The converse is true: a square with side 5 has four equal sides and is a square
- The converse is true, because squares have four equal sides, which is what the original says
- The converse is false: a rhombus with 60° and 120° angles has four equal sides
Both the statement and its converse are true. Every rhombus has perpendicular diagonals. A kite can have perpendicular diagonals. Esme proposes a definition: a quadrilateral is a rhombus if and only if its diagonals are perpendicular. Is it a good definition?
- Yes: a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals, so the converse follows as well, and the definition works
- No: the converse fails, as a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is no rhombus
- Yes: a definition needs just the direction that is true for rhombi, and that direction holds
- No: a rhombus does not have perpendicular diagonals, so the statement itself is false and fails
Read this first
The proof's step
"diagonals not congruent, so not a rectangle". The contrapositive of "if P then Q" is "if not Q then not P".
A proof says: the diagonals of ABCD are not congruent, so ABCD is not a rectangle. Milo asks which theorem it uses as its contrapositive. Which one?
- If a quadrilateral is a rectangle, then it is a parallelogram
- If a quadrilateral is not a rectangle, then its diagonals are not congruent
- If a quadrilateral is a rectangle, then its diagonals are congruent
- If a quadrilateral's diagonals are congruent, then it is a rectangle
Use this
The claim says every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. The negation is true exactly when the claim is false.
A student claims: every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Noah writes the negation. Which statement is it?
- Some quadrilateral has congruent diagonals but is not a rectangle
- Some rectangle has diagonals that are not congruent to each other
- No quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle outright
- Each rectangle has congruent diagonals, which is a known theorem
Pia studies the theorem: if a quadrilateral is a parallelogram, then its opposite sides are congruent. Which statement about its converse is correct?
- The converse is false, because the converse of a true theorem is a false statement
- The converse is false, because a kite has two pairs of congruent sides and is not a parallelogram
- The inverse is the one that is true, and the converse is not true here
- The converse is also true, so together they describe parallelograms
Ren draws a Venn diagram of quadrilaterals: rectangles and rhombi are circles inside parallelograms. Which claim does the diagram support?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares kites trapezoids - Every rectangle is a rhombus, because both circles sit in the same parallelogram circle
- Rectangles and rhombi share no shapes, because they are different circles
- Every square is both a rectangle and a rhombus, so squares sit in the overlap
- Some rhombus is not a parallelogram, since rhombi reach outside the large circle
Tala claims: every parallelogram with perpendicular diagonals is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: parallelograms contain rectangles and rhombi (overlap: squares). In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. Venn diagram: parallelograms contain rectangles and rhombi (overlap: squares). In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. In a parallelogram the diagonals bisect each other. If they are also perpendicular, the four small triangles are congruent right triangles. rectangles rhombi parallelograms squares - False: a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is not a rhombus, so the claim fails
- False: a square has perpendicular diagonals and is not a rhombus, so the claim fails
- True: the four right triangles are congruent, so every side is congruent
- True: every quadrilateral with perpendicular diagonals is a rhombus
Jun claims: no rectangle is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares - False: a parallelogram with unequal sides is both a rectangle and a rhombus
- True: the two circles have different names
- True: a rectangle has unequal sides, so it cannot also be a rhombus
- False: a square is both, so it sits in the overlap
The negation of 'if P then Q' is 'P and not Q'. Statement: if a polygon is a hexagon, then it has 6 sides. Luz writes the negation of this statement. Which one is it?
- A polygon is a hexagon and does not have 6 sides
- If a polygon has 6 sides, then it is a hexagon
- If a polygon is a hexagon, then it does not have 6 sides
- If a polygon is not a hexagon, then it does not have 6 sides