Counterexamples, "not", "and", "or", and Venn diagrams
Grade 10 Math Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
The contrapositive of 'if P then Q' is 'if not Q then not P'. Statement: if a figure is a square, then it has four right angles. Esme writes the contrapositive. Which one is it?
- If a figure does not have four right angles, then it is not a square
- If a figure has four right angles, then it is a square
- If a figure is not a square, then it does not have four right angles
- If a figure is not a square, then it has four right angles
Both the statement and its converse are true. Every rhombus has perpendicular diagonals. A kite can have perpendicular diagonals. Esme proposes a definition: a quadrilateral is a rhombus if and only if its diagonals are perpendicular. Is it a good definition?
- No: the converse fails, as a kite has perpendicular diagonals and is no rhombus
- No: a rhombus does not have perpendicular diagonals, so the statement itself is false and fails
- Yes: a rhombus has perpendicular diagonals, so the converse follows as well, and the definition works
- Yes: a definition needs just the direction that is true for rhombi, and that direction holds
Read this first
The proof's step
"diagonals not congruent, so not a rectangle". The contrapositive of "if P then Q" is "if not Q then not P".
A proof says: the diagonals of ABCD are not congruent, so ABCD is not a rectangle. Milo asks which theorem it uses as its contrapositive. Which one?
- If a quadrilateral is not a rectangle, then its diagonals are not congruent
- If a quadrilateral is a rectangle, then its diagonals are congruent
- If a quadrilateral's diagonals are congruent, then it is a rectangle
- If a quadrilateral is a rectangle, then it is a parallelogram
Use this
The claim says every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. The negation is true exactly when the claim is false.
A student claims: every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Noah writes the negation. Which statement is it?
- Some rectangle has diagonals that are not congruent to each other
- Some quadrilateral has congruent diagonals but is not a rectangle
- Each rectangle has congruent diagonals, which is a known theorem
- No quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle outright
Pia studies the theorem: if a quadrilateral is a parallelogram, then its opposite sides are congruent. Which statement about its converse is correct?
- The converse is also true, so together they describe parallelograms
- The converse is false, because the converse of a true theorem is a false statement
- The converse is false, because a kite has two pairs of congruent sides and is not a parallelogram
- The inverse is the one that is true, and the converse is not true here
Ren draws a Venn diagram of quadrilaterals: rectangles and rhombi are circles inside parallelograms. Which claim does the diagram support?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares kites trapezoids - Rectangles and rhombi share no shapes, because they are different circles
- Every rectangle is a rhombus, because both circles sit in the same parallelogram circle
- Every square is both a rectangle and a rhombus, so squares sit in the overlap
- Some rhombus is not a parallelogram, since rhombi reach outside the large circle
Zee claims: a quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Which figure is a counterexample, and why?
Venn diagram: rectangles sit inside the set of quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals, with room outside the rectangle circle. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. Venn diagram: rectangles sit inside the set of quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals, with room outside the rectangle circle. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals rectangles - A rhombus that is not a square, because its diagonals differ in length
- A rectangle, because it has congruent diagonals
- An isosceles trapezoid: congruent diagonals and no right angles
- A square, because its diagonals are perpendicular and congruent
Jun claims: no rectangle is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares - True: a rectangle has unequal sides, so it cannot also be a rhombus
- False: a parallelogram with unequal sides is both a rectangle and a rhombus
- True: the two circles have different names
- False: a square is both, so it sits in the overlap
Kira claims: everyone in Art is also in Band or Chess. Using the 50-student counts, what does the diagram show?
Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Art Band Chess 50 Art only 8 Band only 6 Chess only 5 Art and Band only 4 Art and Chess only 3 Band and Chess only 2 All three 1 Outside all circles: 21 - False: the 8 students who are in Art only break the claim
- False: the 21 students in no club break the claim
- True: Band and Chess together have more members than Art has
- True: 8 of Art's 16 students are in another club, which is most of them
The negation of 'if P then Q' is 'P and not Q'. Statement: if a polygon is a hexagon, then it has 6 sides. Luz writes the negation of this statement. Which one is it?
- If a polygon has 6 sides, then it is a hexagon
- If a polygon is a hexagon, then it does not have 6 sides
- A polygon is a hexagon and does not have 6 sides
- If a polygon is not a hexagon, then it does not have 6 sides