Counterexamples, "not", "and", "or", and Venn diagrams
Grade 10 Math Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
A counterexample has perpendicular diagonals but is not a rhombus. Ari claims: if a quadrilateral's diagonals are perpendicular, it is a rhombus. Which figure is a counterexample?
- A kite with perpendicular diagonals and sides 3, 3, 5, 5
- A rhombus with diagonals 6 and 8
- A 3 by 4 rectangle, whose diagonals are not perpendicular
- A square with side 4 and perpendicular diagonals
Three points form a triangle unless they lie on one line. Bo claims: any three points with different x-coordinates are corners of a triangle. Which set is a counterexample?
- (0, 0), (4, 0), (2, 3)
- (1, 2), (3, 6), (5, 9)
- (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3)
- (0, 0), (0, 5), (3, 5)
The contrapositive of 'if P then Q' is 'if not Q then not P'. Statement: if a figure is a square, then it has four right angles. Esme writes the contrapositive. Which one is it?
- If a figure does not have four right angles, then it is not a square
- If a figure has four right angles, then it is a square
- If a figure is not a square, then it does not have four right angles
- If a figure is not a square, then it has four right angles
Read this first
Use this
"P if and only if Q" means both "if P then Q" and "if Q then P". P: a quadrilateral is a rectangle. Q: it has four right angles.
A definition says: a quadrilateral is a rectangle if and only if it has four right angles. Kira unpacks it. Which statement says the same thing?
- If a quadrilateral is a rectangle, then it has four right angles; the other direction is not claimed
- A rectangle has four right angles, and a quadrilateral with four right angles is a rectangle
- If a quadrilateral has four right angles, then it is a square, and a square is a special rectangle
- If a quadrilateral is a rectangle, it has four right angles; if it is not a rectangle, it does not
Use this
The claim says every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. The negation is true exactly when the claim is false.
A student claims: every quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Noah writes the negation. Which statement is it?
- Each rectangle has congruent diagonals, which is a known theorem
- No quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle outright
- Some quadrilateral has congruent diagonals but is not a rectangle
- Some rectangle has diagonals that are not congruent to each other
Pia studies the theorem: if a quadrilateral is a parallelogram, then its opposite sides are congruent. Which statement about its converse is correct?
The converse: if both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are congruent, then it is a parallelogram. A kite has two pairs of congruent sides, but they are next to each other. The converse: if both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are congruent, then it is a parallelogram. A kite has two pairs of congruent sides, but they are next to each other. The converse: if both pairs of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are congruent, then it is a parallelogram. A kite has two pairs of congruent sides, but they are next to each other. - The converse is false, because the converse of a true theorem is a false statement
- The inverse is the one that is true, and the converse is not true here
- The converse is false, because a kite has two pairs of congruent sides and is not a parallelogram
- The converse is also true, so together they describe parallelograms
Ren draws a Venn diagram of quadrilaterals: rectangles and rhombi are circles inside parallelograms. Which claim does the diagram support?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, two overlapping circles: rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Kites and trapezoids are drawn outside the parallelogram circle. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares kites trapezoids - Some rhombus is not a parallelogram, since rhombi reach outside the large circle
- Every rectangle is a rhombus, because both circles sit in the same parallelogram circle
- Rectangles and rhombi share no shapes, because they are different circles
- Every square is both a rectangle and a rhombus, so squares sit in the overlap
Zee claims: a quadrilateral with congruent diagonals is a rectangle. Which figure is a counterexample, and why?
Venn diagram: rectangles sit inside the set of quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals, with room outside the rectangle circle. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. Venn diagram: rectangles sit inside the set of quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals, with room outside the rectangle circle. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. An isosceles trapezoid has congruent diagonals. quadrilaterals with congruent diagonals rectangles - A rectangle, because it has congruent diagonals
- A rhombus that is not a square, because its diagonals differ in length
- A square, because its diagonals are perpendicular and congruent
- An isosceles trapezoid: congruent diagonals and no right angles
Jun claims: no rectangle is a rhombus. Using the family Venn diagram, what is the verdict?
Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. Venn diagram: a large circle for parallelograms. Inside it, overlapping circles for rectangles and rhombi. The overlap holds squares. parallelograms rectangles rhombi squares - True: a rectangle has unequal sides, so it cannot also be a rhombus
- False: a parallelogram with unequal sides is both a rectangle and a rhombus
- True: the two circles have different names
- False: a square is both, so it sits in the overlap
Kira claims: everyone in Art is also in Band or Chess. Using the 50-student counts, what does the diagram show?
Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Three overlapping circles Art, Band, Chess in a rectangle of 50. Art only 8, Band only 6, Chess only 5. Art and Band only 4, Art and Chess only 3, Band and Chess only 2. All three 1. Outside all circles: 21. Art Band Chess 50 Art only 8 Band only 6 Chess only 5 Art and Band only 4 Art and Chess only 3 Band and Chess only 2 All three 1 Outside all circles: 21 - True: Band and Chess together have more members than Art has
- False: the 8 students who are in Art only break the claim
- False: the 21 students in no club break the claim
- True: 8 of Art's 16 students are in another club, which is most of them