Why the Western Roman Empire fell: several causes

Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

NameDate

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  2. What did Alexander Demandt do in 1984, Tala asks?

    • Found the one true cause of the fall
    • Wrote that Rome grew too great
    • Listed over 200 factors writers named
    • Measured the climate of the 200s CE in Rome
  3. What do continuists argue, Zee asks?

    • Rome grew too great to last long
    • A sharp break, with fewer cities and less trade
    • A slower change, with Roman ways going on
    • A disease alone ended Rome in 180
  4. Which two causes do climate and disease researchers point to, Ari asks?

    • A disease and a cooler, drier climate
    • Weak rulers and rising prices in the cities
    • A long list of 200 factors
    • Rome's great size and its wealth
  5. Gibbon wrote in 1781. Why should Jun read Gibbon's view as one view, not the last word?

    • Later historians named more causes
    • Gibbon saw Rome fall himself
    • Gibbon listed the 200 factors
    • Gibbon wrote it in 476 CE
  6. Ranking causes by when they began

    CauseWhen
    Weak rulers235 to 284 CE
    Money troubles (less silver in coins)the 200s CE
    Rule split into East and West285 to 293 CE
    Groups from outside take western lands410 to 476 CE
    Odovacer removes the last Western emperor476 CE

    Below the chart: a long-term cause builds up over many years; a short-term cause comes just before the event. Historians weigh and rank these causes differently.

  7. Which is a long-term cause, by the chart, Kira asks?

    • Odovacer's act in 476 CE
    • The end of the Western emperors in 476
    • Lands lost from 410 CE
    • Money troubles in the 200s CE
  8. Luz must rank the causes of the fall. Which statement is most careful?

    • Historians agree weak rulers came first
    • Historians agree the climate came first
    • The causes did not affect each other
    • Historians rank the causes differently
  9. Milo ranks money troubles above Odovacer's act in 476 CE. Which reason fits best?

    • Odovacer caused the money troubles
    • Inflation made Rome richer
    • They weakened Rome for many years
    • They began after 476 CE
  10. How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  11. Noah's note says, "The whole Roman Empire ended in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Change Roman to Greek
    • Change whole to Western
    • Leave it: 476 is the date
    • Change 476 CE to 1781
  12. Pia's note says, "Demandt found one cause of the fall in 1984." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: he found the one cause
    • Change Demandt to Odovacer
    • Change 1984 to 1781
    • Change one cause to over 200 factors
  13. Ren's note says, "Gibbon saw Rome fall in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Change it: he wrote about it in 1781
    • Change 476 CE to 1984
    • Leave it: he wrote about 476
    • Change Gibbon to Constantine
PencilGopencilgo.com

Why the Western Roman Empire fell: several causes

Answer Key - Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  2. What did Alexander Demandt do in 1984, Tala asks?

    • Found the one true cause of the fall
    • Wrote that Rome grew too great
    • Listed over 200 factors writers named
    • Measured the climate of the 200s CE in Rome
  3. What do continuists argue, Zee asks?

    • Rome grew too great to last long
    • A sharp break, with fewer cities and less trade
    • A slower change, with Roman ways going on
    • A disease alone ended Rome in 180
  4. Which two causes do climate and disease researchers point to, Ari asks?

    • A disease and a cooler, drier climate
    • Weak rulers and rising prices in the cities
    • A long list of 200 factors
    • Rome's great size and its wealth
  5. Gibbon wrote in 1781. Why should Jun read Gibbon's view as one view, not the last word?

    • Later historians named more causes
    • Gibbon saw Rome fall himself
    • Gibbon listed the 200 factors
    • Gibbon wrote it in 476 CE
  6. Ranking causes by when they began

    CauseWhen
    Weak rulers235 to 284 CE
    Money troubles (less silver in coins)the 200s CE
    Rule split into East and West285 to 293 CE
    Groups from outside take western lands410 to 476 CE
    Odovacer removes the last Western emperor476 CE

    Below the chart: a long-term cause builds up over many years; a short-term cause comes just before the event. Historians weigh and rank these causes differently.

  7. Which is a long-term cause, by the chart, Kira asks?

    • Odovacer's act in 476 CE
    • The end of the Western emperors in 476
    • Lands lost from 410 CE
    • Money troubles in the 200s CE
  8. Luz must rank the causes of the fall. Which statement is most careful?

    • Historians agree weak rulers came first
    • Historians agree the climate came first
    • The causes did not affect each other
    • Historians rank the causes differently
  9. Milo ranks money troubles above Odovacer's act in 476 CE. Which reason fits best?

    • Odovacer caused the money troubles
    • Inflation made Rome richer
    • They weakened Rome for many years
    • They began after 476 CE
  10. How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  11. Noah's note says, "The whole Roman Empire ended in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Change Roman to Greek
    • Change whole to Western
    • Leave it: 476 is the date
    • Change 476 CE to 1781
  12. Pia's note says, "Demandt found one cause of the fall in 1984." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: he found the one cause
    • Change Demandt to Odovacer
    • Change 1984 to 1781
    • Change one cause to over 200 factors
  13. Ren's note says, "Gibbon saw Rome fall in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Change it: he wrote about it in 1781
    • Change 476 CE to 1984
    • Leave it: he wrote about 476
    • Change Gibbon to Constantine