Why the Western Roman Empire fell: several causes

Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

NameDate

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  2. What did Alexander Demandt do in 1984, Tala asks?

    • Wrote that Rome grew too great
    • Found the one true cause of the fall
    • Measured the climate of the 200s CE in Rome
    • Listed over 200 factors writers named
  3. What do continuists argue, Zee asks?

    • A sharp break, with fewer cities and less trade
    • A disease alone ended Rome in 180
    • A slower change, with Roman ways going on
    • Rome grew too great to last long
  4. In the passage, what does Gibbon say caused Rome's decline, Bo asks?

    • Its small size and few lands
    • Its own growth into a great size
    • A sudden disease that came in a single year
    • A cooler climate in the 200s
  5. Gibbon wrote in 1781. Why should Jun read Gibbon's view as one view, not the last word?

    • Later historians named more causes
    • Gibbon listed the 200 factors
    • Gibbon wrote it in 476 CE
    • Gibbon saw Rome fall himself
  6. Ranking causes by when they began

    CauseWhen
    Weak rulers235 to 284 CE
    Money troubles (less silver in coins)the 200s CE
    Rule split into East and West285 to 293 CE
    Groups from outside take western lands410 to 476 CE
    Odovacer removes the last Western emperor476 CE

    Below the chart: a long-term cause builds up over many years; a short-term cause comes just before the event. Historians weigh and rank these causes differently.

  7. Which is a long-term cause, by the chart, Kira asks?

    • The end of the Western emperors in 476
    • Money troubles in the 200s CE
    • Lands lost from 410 CE
    • Odovacer's act in 476 CE
  8. Luz must rank the causes of the fall. Which statement is most careful?

    • Historians agree weak rulers came first
    • The causes did not affect each other
    • Historians rank the causes differently
    • Historians agree the climate came first
  9. Milo ranks money troubles above Odovacer's act in 476 CE. Which reason fits best?

    • Odovacer caused the money troubles
    • They began after 476 CE
    • Inflation made Rome richer
    • They weakened Rome for many years
  10. How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  11. Noah's note says, "The whole Roman Empire ended in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: 476 is the date
    • Change Roman to Greek
    • Change 476 CE to 1781
    • Change whole to Western
  12. Pia's note says, "Demandt found one cause of the fall in 1984." Which fix is right?

    • Change Demandt to Odovacer
    • Change one cause to over 200 factors
    • Leave it: he found the one cause
    • Change 1984 to 1781
  13. Ren's note says, "Gibbon saw Rome fall in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Change it: he wrote about it in 1781
    • Change 476 CE to 1984
    • Leave it: he wrote about 476
    • Change Gibbon to Constantine
PencilGopencilgo.com

Why the Western Roman Empire fell: several causes

Answer Key - Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  2. What did Alexander Demandt do in 1984, Tala asks?

    • Wrote that Rome grew too great
    • Found the one true cause of the fall
    • Measured the climate of the 200s CE in Rome
    • Listed over 200 factors writers named
  3. What do continuists argue, Zee asks?

    • A sharp break, with fewer cities and less trade
    • A disease alone ended Rome in 180
    • A slower change, with Roman ways going on
    • Rome grew too great to last long
  4. In the passage, what does Gibbon say caused Rome's decline, Bo asks?

    • Its small size and few lands
    • Its own growth into a great size
    • A sudden disease that came in a single year
    • A cooler climate in the 200s
  5. Gibbon wrote in 1781. Why should Jun read Gibbon's view as one view, not the last word?

    • Later historians named more causes
    • Gibbon listed the 200 factors
    • Gibbon wrote it in 476 CE
    • Gibbon saw Rome fall himself
  6. Ranking causes by when they began

    CauseWhen
    Weak rulers235 to 284 CE
    Money troubles (less silver in coins)the 200s CE
    Rule split into East and West285 to 293 CE
    Groups from outside take western lands410 to 476 CE
    Odovacer removes the last Western emperor476 CE

    Below the chart: a long-term cause builds up over many years; a short-term cause comes just before the event. Historians weigh and rank these causes differently.

  7. Which is a long-term cause, by the chart, Kira asks?

    • The end of the Western emperors in 476
    • Money troubles in the 200s CE
    • Lands lost from 410 CE
    • Odovacer's act in 476 CE
  8. Luz must rank the causes of the fall. Which statement is most careful?

    • Historians agree weak rulers came first
    • The causes did not affect each other
    • Historians rank the causes differently
    • Historians agree the climate came first
  9. Milo ranks money troubles above Odovacer's act in 476 CE. Which reason fits best?

    • Odovacer caused the money troubles
    • They began after 476 CE
    • Inflation made Rome richer
    • They weakened Rome for many years
  10. How historians explain the fall

    WhoWhenWhat they argue
    Edward Gibbon, an English historian1781Rome grew too great, and its size led to its decline
    Alexander Demandt, a German historian1984listed more than 200 factors that writers had named
    Catastrophists, one group of historiansrecenta sharp break: fewer cities, less trade, less reading and writing
    Continuists, another grouprecenta slower change: trade went on, bishops took on governors' jobs, and new kings kept some Roman ways
    Researchers on climate and diseaserecenta disease (165 to 180 CE) and a cooler, drier climate from the mid-200s hurt farming

    Beside the chart: Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, General Observations (1781): "But the decline of Rome was the natural and inevitable [bound to happen] effect of immoderate greatness [growing too great]. Prosperity ripened the principle of decay; the causes of destruction multiplied with the extent of conquest…" Historians still disagree about which causes mattered most. The Eastern Empire lasted until 1453.

  11. Noah's note says, "The whole Roman Empire ended in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: 476 is the date
    • Change Roman to Greek
    • Change 476 CE to 1781
    • Change whole to Western
  12. Pia's note says, "Demandt found one cause of the fall in 1984." Which fix is right?

    • Change Demandt to Odovacer
    • Change one cause to over 200 factors
    • Leave it: he found the one cause
    • Change 1984 to 1781
  13. Ren's note says, "Gibbon saw Rome fall in 476 CE." Which fix is right?

    • Change it: he wrote about it in 1781
    • Change 476 CE to 1984
    • Leave it: he wrote about 476
    • Change Gibbon to Constantine