India's Maurya and Gupta empires, and the number zero
Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Numerals, zero and place value: the evidence
Evidence Date What it shows Brahmi numerals from about 250 BCE separate signs for 1 to 9, 10, 100 and more; no place value Aryabhata's book, the Aryabhatiya 499 CE a counting system with place value, using letters of the alphabet; no sign for zero A land-gift charter dated Chhedi year 346 594 CE the oldest dated record with a number written in place-value form as we write it; a few historians doubt its date Gwalior inscription (Vikrama year 933) 876 CE the earliest dated zero in India that everyone agrees is genuine Bakhshali manuscript, held at Oxford date debated: 200 to 1100 CE proposed hundreds of zeros written as dots; Oxford tests: 2017 said 3rd or 4th century, 2024 put its bark in about 800 to 1100 CE Below the chart: place value means a digit's worth depends on where it sits, like the 2 in 20 and in 200.
How many years came between Aryabhata's book and the Gwalior inscription, Pia asks?
- 1,375 years
- 37 years
- 377 years
- 477 years
Which statement about the Bakhshali manuscript's date is the most careful, Ren asks?
- Its date is debated; 200 to 1100 CE is proposed
- It is from the 3rd or 4th century, as Oxford showed
- It is from the 800s CE, which settles the matter
- It cannot be tested
Tala wants one piece of evidence for a genuine, dated zero in India that everyone accepts. Which is the best pick?
- The charter of 594 CE; a few doubt its date
- Aryabhata's book; it has no zero sign
- The Bakhshali manuscript; its date is debated
- The Gwalior inscription, 876 CE
What can Zee say about who invented zero, using the chart?
- It grew in steps over time
- Aryabhata did, in 499 CE
- Brahmi numerals did, about 250 BCE
- The Gwalior stone did, in 876 CE
Aryabhata and the sky (his book of 499 CE)
Topic What Aryabhata wrote Compared with today Length of a year 365 days, 6 hours, 12 minutes and 30 seconds a little too long, by today's measurements The circle add 4 to 100, multiply by 8, then add 62,000; the result is about the distance around a circle 20,000 wide gives pi as 3.1416, very close to today's 3.14159 The turning sky the daily turning of the sky comes from Earth turning on its axis matches today's science Eclipses gave their causes in terms of the Sun, Moon and Earth matches today's science Below the chart: Aryabhata was 23 years old when he finished the Aryabhatiya in 499 CE.
Which of Aryabhata's results does the chart say is a little off from today's, Ari asks?
- The turning sky: Earth's spin
- Eclipses: their causes
- The year: a little too long
- The circle: pi as 3.1416
Aryabhata's rule says add 4 to 100, multiply by 8, then add 62,000. What number does it give, Bo asks?
- 832
- 62,104
- 62,832
- 62,132
Aryabhata finished his book in 499 CE, aged 23. In what year was he born, Esme asks?
- 522 CE
- 476 CE
- 477 CE
- 476 BCE
Numerals, zero and place value: the evidence
Evidence Date What it shows Brahmi numerals from about 250 BCE separate signs for 1 to 9, 10, 100 and more; no place value Aryabhata's book, the Aryabhatiya 499 CE a counting system with place value, using letters of the alphabet; no sign for zero A land-gift charter dated Chhedi year 346 594 CE the oldest dated record with a number written in place-value form as we write it; a few historians doubt its date Gwalior inscription (Vikrama year 933) 876 CE the earliest dated zero in India that everyone agrees is genuine Bakhshali manuscript, held at Oxford date debated: 200 to 1100 CE proposed hundreds of zeros written as dots; Oxford tests: 2017 said 3rd or 4th century, 2024 put its bark in about 800 to 1100 CE Below the chart: place value means a digit's worth depends on where it sits, like the 2 in 20 and in 200.
Jun's note says, "Aryabhata invented the zero in 499 CE." Which fix is right?
- Leave it: his book is dated to 499 CE
- Change zero to pi
- Change 499 CE to 499 BCE
- Change it: his book has no zero sign
Kira's note says, "The Bakhshali manuscript is surely from the Gupta period." Which fix is right?
- Change manuscript to inscription
- Change it: its date is debated
- Leave it: Oxford tested it in 2017
- Change Gupta to Maurya
Luz's note says, "Place-value numbers first appeared at Gwalior in 876 CE." Which fix is right?
- Change 876 CE to 876 BCE
- Change it: Gwalior is the earliest zero in India all accept
- Change Gwalior to Brahmi
- Leave it: Gwalior is the oldest date on the whole chart