Where and when Buddhism began, and what its followers believe and practice
Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
The Buddha and where Buddhism began (cards A to D). Card A, Buddhist tradition, in our words: according to tradition, Siddhartha Gautama was born at Lumbini. Followers believe that after years of searching he became the Buddha, a title meaning "the awakened one," and that he gave his first sermon at Sarnath, in India, near the city of Varanasi. Card B, a note by scholars, in our words: Buddhism began in northeastern India between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE. Scholars disagree about the Buddha's dates: some say about 563 to 483 BCE, others about 448 to 368 BCE. Card C, a map note: Lumbini lies in Nepal, near the border with India. Sarnath lies in India. Followers of Buddhism are called Buddhists. Card D, how the story was kept: the Buddha's teachings were first passed on by word of mouth. The accounts of his life that followers wrote down were written long after his lifetime.
Card A says "according to tradition" and "followers believe." What does that tell Ari about the kind of source card A is?
- It was written by the Buddha himself as an account of his own life
- It is of no use to a historian, since it comes from religious tradition
- It states the Buddha's awakening as a fact that history has settled
- It reports what followers hold to be true, as tradition and belief
Cards A and C name two places in the story of the Buddha. Which statement matches both cards, Esme asks?
- Lumbini, his birthplace by tradition, is in Nepal; Sarnath is in India
- Both Lumbini and Sarnath lie in the country of Nepal
- Both places lie in India, because the religion began in India
- Sarnath lies in Nepal and Lumbini lies in India, near the city of Varanasi
Card B gives two sets of dates for the Buddha. Which sentence matches what the card says, Jun asks?
- Scholars give no dates, since the story is a matter of belief and not history
- Scholars place him in the 6th to 4th centuries BCE but disagree on exact dates
- Scholars have settled on 563 to 483 BCE as the true dates of his life
- Scholars place him in the 1st century CE, long after the other dates
Card D says the teachings were passed on by word of mouth, and the life stories were written down much later. Why might accounts differ, Kira asks?
- Writing makes an account less careful than telling the story aloud does
- The Buddha wrote parts of the story himself and later followers left them out
- Followers made up the whole story so that more people would join them
- Stories told by mouth for generations can shift a little in the retelling
Card B gives two sets of dates for the Buddha's birth, 563 BCE and 448 BCE. How many years apart are the two birth years, Luz asks?
- 15 years
- 125 years
- 1,011 years
- 115 years
Card B is a note by scholars and card A is a summary of tradition. How do the two differ as sources, Milo asks?
- Card B weighs evidence and flags disagreement; card A reports tradition
- Card B gives the Buddha's own words, while card A is a plain summary
- Card B is less reliable than card A, because scholars were not there
- Card B settles that card A is true, since both mention the Buddha's time
Card A says the Buddha was born at Lumbini, in Nepal. Card B says Buddhism began in northeastern India. Do the cards conflict, Noah asks?
- No: card A is a plain fact that the Buddha was born at Lumbini
- Yes: Lumbini and northeastern India are far apart, so one card is wrong
- Yes: card B shows that Lumbini is really in India
- No: he was born near the border and his teaching grew in India
Card B puts the Buddha's death in 483 BCE by the earlier dates. About how many years ago was 483 BCE, if this year is 2026 CE, Pia asks?
- About 2,000 years ago
- About 1,540 years ago
- About 2,500 years ago
- About 480 years ago
A history book says "Followers believe the Buddha became awakened." Why does the book write "followers believe," Ren asks?
- It shows that historians found no evidence about the Buddha
- History reports what people hold true without judging it
- It tells readers that the belief is false and should be dropped
- It shows that the author is a follower who wants to teach the religion
Card D says the accounts of the Buddha's life were written long after his death. How does that affect what scholars can say, Zee asks?
- Scholars can say nothing about the Buddha, because the accounts are late
- Scholars can learn the truth of each detail by asking followers today
- Scholars treat late accounts as tradition and mark what is uncertain
- Scholars can give exact dates, because late writers were careful ones