Persia: a huge empire held together by roads and governors
Grade 6 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Many peoples, one empire (cards A to D; summaries in our words). Card A, a stone statue of Darius I, found at Susa in 1972. It is carved with writing in Egyptian hieroglyphs and in cuneiform in three languages, and its inscription says it was made in Egypt. Card B, Aramaic documents: letters and records in Aramaic from Persian times have been found in Egypt in the west and in Bactria in the east. The Bactria documents are dated between 353 and 324 BCE. Card C, a papyrus copied in Egypt long after Darius's time: it says Darius ordered Egypt's wise men to collect the country's old laws and write them down. Card D, the empire's dates: Cyrus the Great founded it about 550 BCE, and Alexander of Macedon conquered it by 330 BCE.
Card A has writing in Egyptian hieroglyphs and in cuneiform. What does that suggest about its audience, Ari asks?
- It spoke to Egyptians and to Persian officials alike, in each one's own script
- It shows that people across the empire could read Egyptian hieroglyphs
- It was a statue of an Egyptian king, made before Persia ruled Egypt
- It was made to help scholars of today read hieroglyphs beside cuneiform, long after Persia's rule
Cards A and B come from Egypt and Bactria, far apart. What do they together suggest about Persian rule, Bo asks?
- Rulers forced each people to give up its own language and customs
- Rulers wrote in Old Persian alone, which made Aramaic an unofficial language
- Rulers sent Egyptian clerks to Bactria, so the two lands shared officials
- Rulers used local forms and a shared written language to reach many peoples
Card C was copied in Egypt long after Darius's time. How should a historian use it, Jun asks?
- As a record made during Darius's reign, so it needs no further checking
- As a modern summary that lists the laws of Egypt for a textbook on ancient Egypt
- As worthless, because Egyptians who disliked Persian rule would not write it
- As a later account of a tradition, drawn from sources from his time
Why was a shared written language such as Aramaic useful, as the documents in card B suggest, Kira asks?
- It stopped provinces from keeping their own languages for daily life
- Officials in far provinces could write to each other without translating
- It was the language of the statue in card A, so orders used it
- It let Alexander's officers read Persian records after they conquered the empire
Card D says the empire began about 550 BCE and ended by 330 BCE. About how many years did it last, Luz asks?
- About 880 years, found by adding 550 and 330 together
- About 220 years, since 550 minus 330 is 220
- About 22 years, from reading 220 as 22
- About 36 years, the length of Darius's reign from 522 to 486 BCE
Card B says the Bactria documents run to 324 BCE, after the empire ended by 330 BCE. What does that show, Milo asks?
- The Persian Empire had not ended, because its documents were still dated
- Aramaic record-keeping carried on there even after the Persian Empire ended
- Everything about Persian rule stayed the same after Alexander's conquest
- Alexander's conquest began after 324 BCE, so the dates fit his rule
Card A was made for Darius. Card C was copied in Egypt long after. How do their viewpoints differ, Noah asks?
- Both show Egypt's own view, because both were carved by Egyptian craftsmen
- Both were made in Susa, so both show the Persian court's view
- Card A shows how Darius chose to appear; card C shows how he was remembered
- Card A shows how Egyptians later remembered him; card C shows how he chose to appear
Which new find would best test card C's claim that Darius had Egypt's laws collected, Pia asks?
- A legal text from Darius's reign in Egypt that cites the collected laws
- A new book that retells the papyrus story in plain words for students
- A new copy of the Behistun carving, found in the same Persian cliff
- Another copy of the same papyrus, since a papyrus cannot be checked
Card B dates the Bactria documents from 353 to 324 BCE. About how many years do they cover, Zee asks?
- About 29 years, since 353 minus 324 is 29
- About 677 years, found by adding 353 and 324 together
- About 39 years, since 353 minus 324 is 39
- About 2,350 years, counted from 324 BCE to today
A student says, "Card B proves Persians never used Old Persian for records." Which card challenges that, Ren asks?
- Card A has cuneiform in three languages, so royal writing was not just Aramaic
- Card C, since it says Darius wrote the laws of Egypt himself in Old Persian script
- Card D, since it shows that Old Persian was spoken in each province
- Neither, since an Aramaic document means the Persian language was not written