Read between the lines and prove it
Grade 7 Reading Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
The Spelling Bee
[1] I told everyone that the regional spelling bee was no big deal. [2] "It's only a Saturday," I said to Zee on the bus, and I laughed a little too loudly. [3] That night I borrowed the school's word list from Ms. Park and copied all four hundred words into a notebook. [4] I told my parents I was doing ordinary homework, and I kept the notebook hidden under my history textbook. [5] On Friday, Zee asked whether I wanted to bike to the lake after class. [6] "Can't," I said. "Dentist." [7] The truth was that I spent that entire afternoon reading the list aloud to the bathroom mirror, spelling each difficult word slowly and carefully. [8] At the bee, I stood at the microphone and heard my own voice crack on the first word, which made the audience go quiet. [9] I spelled it correctly anyway, and so I did the next eight words in a row. [10] When I finally missed "chrysanthemum," I sat down, and Zee was already clapping. [11] "Nobody told me you were that good," Zee said afterward. [12] I shrugged and said it was nothing, but I carried that notebook in my backpack for the rest of the school year.
Pia asks how the narrator's words differ from the narrator's actions. Which choice gives the best-supported inference and proof?
- The narrator is too nervous to compete well in front of a crowd. Proof: [8] and [10].
- The narrator is ashamed of Zee and does not want to be seen together. Proof: [5] and [6].
- The narrator copied four hundred words from the school's list into a notebook. Proof: [3] and [4].
- The narrator says the bee is unimportant but secretly prepares hard. Proof: [3] and [7].
Bo asks why the narrator says “Dentist” in [6]. Which choice has the best-supported inference and proof?
- The narrator wanted to practice in private and avoid explaining why. Proof: [6] and [7].
- The narrator wants to avoid Zee entirely and has stopped being friends. Proof: [5] and [6].
- The narrator dislikes biking with Zee and wants an excuse to say no. Proof: [2] and [5].
- The narrator has a real dentist appointment that afternoon. Proof: [4] and [6].
Luz asks what [12] suggests about how the narrator felt about the bee afterward. Which choice is best supported?
- The narrator was relieved that the bee was over. Proof: [10] and [12].
- The narrator valued the effort more than the shrug admits. Proof: [1] and [2].
- The narrator valued the effort more than the shrug admits. Proof: [11] and [12].
- The narrator plans to quit spelling bees. Proof: [10] and [12].
Tala asks what the clues can support about why the narrator hid the studying. Which choice makes the strongest claim the sentences fully prove?
- The narrator hid the notebook so that Zee would not decide to enter the bee. Proof: [2] and [5].
- The narrator told the parents that the notebook was just homework. Proof: [3] and [4].
- The narrator hid the effort, probably to avoid seeming to care too much. Proof: [1] and [4].
- The narrator's parents would have punished any extra studying at night. Proof: [4] and [7].
Where Did the Frogs Go?
[1] For ten years, volunteers have listened for spring peeper frogs at six ponds near the town of Alder Creek. [2] Each April, they record the number of frogs calling during a ten-minute count. [3] At five of the ponds, the counts stayed steady. [4] At Pond 6, which lies beside a new highway, the count fell from about 120 calls to fewer than 20. [5] A biologist named Dr. Imani suggested three possible causes: traffic noise, road salt washing into the water, and a cold, late spring. [6] Cold weather would likely have affected all six ponds, not just one, since the ponds are within a few miles of each other. [7] When the team tested the water, Pond 6 had far more salt than the others, although the team has not yet shown that this amount of salt harms the tadpoles. [8] The team also placed recorders at Pond 6 and found that traffic noise was loud at the edge of the pond during the hours when the frogs usually call. [9] Female frogs choose mates by their calls, so noise might make it harder for them to find males. [10] Dr. Imani says that salt and noise may both be involved, and that the team will keep recording through next spring before drawing a conclusion.
Ren asks how traffic noise might lower the number of frogs. Which choice has the best-supported inference and proof?
- Noise may hide the males' calls, so females may have trouble finding mates. Proof: [1] and [2].
- Noise may hide the males' calls, so females may have trouble finding mates. Proof: [8] and [9].
- Noise has driven the female frogs away from Pond 6. Proof: [8] and [9].
- Female frogs choose mates by their calls. Proof: [9] and [10].
Zee asks why Dr. Imani will keep recording before drawing a conclusion. Which choice gives the best-supported inference and proof?
- Dr. Imani doubts the volunteers can count frogs correctly. Proof: [2] and [10].
- Dr. Imani and the team will keep recording through next spring. Proof: [9] and [10].
- Salt and noise both occur at Pond 6, so more recordings are needed. Proof: [8] and [10].
- Dr. Imani has already decided it is salt and is waiting for more tests. Proof: [7] and [10].
Reading Tree Rings
[1] Each year, a tree adds a new layer of wood under its bark, which forms a ring that can be counted in a cut trunk. [2] Scientists can also take a thin core from a living tree without cutting it down. [3] In a year with plenty of water and warmth, a tree usually grows a wide ring. [4] In a year of drought or extreme cold, the ring is often narrow. [5] A single tree can be misleading, because a ring may be narrow for reasons that affect only that tree, such as crowding by its neighbors or damage from insects. [6] So researchers compare the pattern of wide and narrow rings across many trees in the same region. [7] When the same sequence of narrow rings appears in dozens of trees, it likely reflects a regional event such as drought. [8] By matching patterns between living trees and old timber from buildings, researchers can build a record that stretches back many centuries. [9] Tree rings can show that a dry or cold period happened, and roughly when. [10] They cannot show by themselves whether the cause was drought, cold, or both.
Kira asks why researchers compare many trees instead of relying on one. Which choice has the best-supported inference?
- A pattern shared by many trees points to the climate, not to one tree's problems. Proof: [5] and [7].
- A single tree's rings are more accurate than any comparison among trees. Proof: [2] and [5].
- Researchers compare the ring patterns of many trees in one region. Proof: [6] and [8].
- A single tree does not record anything useful about the climate. Proof: [3] and [5].
Ari asks: “A core from one pine shows six narrow rings in a row. What can the reader conclude?” Which choice makes the strongest claim the sentences prove?
- Narrow rings often mean a year of drought or extreme cold. Proof: [3] and [4].
- A six-year drought struck the whole region where the pine grew, and other trees show it too. Proof: [4] and [7].
- Something slowed this tree's growth, but one tree cannot show a regional drought. Proof: [4] and [5].
- The tree had plenty of water and warmth for those six years. Proof: [3] and [4].
Noah asks how old timber from buildings lets researchers extend the record in [8]. Which choice has the best-supported inference?
- Old timber can overlap with living trees' patterns, linking recent years to older ones. Proof: [6] and [8].
- Old timber has more rings than living trees, so researchers can just count them. Proof: [1] and [8].
- Old timber is useful just for trees that were cut during a drought. Proof: [4] and [8].
- Old timber shows the exact age of each building in the region. Proof: [8] and [9].
Esme hears a claim that narrow rings prove there was low rainfall. Which response is best supported?
- The claim is supported, since narrow rings come from drought in dozens of trees. Proof: [4] and [7].
- Tree rings can show roughly when a dry or cold period happened. Proof: [9] and [10].
- Narrow rings show that a dry or cold period happened, not which one caused it. Proof: [9] and [10].
- Narrow rings show that low rainfall alone caused the narrow growth in the tree. Proof: [3] and [4].