Mercantilism: colonies supplying raw materials to the home country
Grade 7 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Mun on trade (cards A to D; summaries in our words, one quotation exact). Card A, England's trade as Thomas Mun describes it: England sells cloth, lead, tin, iron and fish abroad, worth £2,200,000 a year, and buys foreign goods worth £2,000,000 a year. The difference is brought home as treasure, meaning gold and silver. Card B, from Mun's book (most likely written between 1620 and 1630, printed in 1664; p. 7 of the 1895 reprint, original spelling): "The ordinary means therefore to encrease our wealth and treasure is by Forraign Trade, wherein wee must ever observe this rule; to sell more to strangers [foreigners] yearly than wee consume of theirs in value." Card C, about Mun: Thomas Mun was a merchant and a director of the East India Company. He wrote to defend the company's trade, and its ships carried silver out of England to pay for goods from Asia. Card D, a note on the name: Mun did not use the word mercantilism. That name was given later to the ideas and policies of states that tried to sell more than they bought.
Who wrote card B, and what was the writer's position, Ari asks?
- A modern historian, who summarized how seventeenth-century merchants thought about trade
- An English farmer, who wrote about the price of cloth and the wool trade
- A royal tax collector, who wrote about customs duties at the port of London
- Thomas Mun, a merchant and company director who wrote about trade he knew well
Card A gives exports of £2,200,000 and imports of £2,000,000 a year. How much more does England sell than it buys, Bo asks?
- £200,000 a year, which card A says comes home as treasure
- £4,200,000 a year, found by adding exports and imports together
- £20,000 a year, since £2,200,000 minus £2,000,000 is £20,000
- £2,000,000 a year, the value of the foreign goods that England buys
Card C says Mun directed the East India Company, whose ships carried silver out of England. Why might he argue that trade brings treasure, Esme asks?
- His company sent silver abroad, so he wanted to show trade brings treasure home
- He was paid by the king to write about silver, and he had no stake in the trade
- His company wanted to stop trade, so he argued that trade sends treasure out of England
- He wanted to help later critics test the idea that wealth lies in gold and silver
A student writes, "Mun says England should not buy foreign goods." Which words in card B challenge that, Jun asks?
- "wee must ever observe this rule", which says England must end buying from abroad
- "increase our wealth and treasure", which says England should keep its treasure at home
- "Forraign Trade", which shows that Mun wrote in the 1620s, when trade was growing
- "to sell more to strangers [foreigners] yearly than wee consume of theirs", which allows some buying
Card C says the company's ships carried silver out of England. How might a critic and Mun each have seen that, Kira asks?
- A critic may see silver leaving England, while Mun says trade brings back more
- Both would have agreed that silver leaving England was a loss, since silver is wealth
- A critic would see the cloth trade as a loss, and Mun would see fish as a gain
- A critic would praise the silver going out, while Mun would want it kept at home
Suppose England's exports fell to £1,900,000 while imports stayed £2,000,000. What would follow under Mun's rule, Luz asks?
- England would earn £200,000 in treasure, the same gap as before
- England would stop trading, since Mun says trade must end when exports fall
- England would buy £100,000 more than it sold, so treasure would flow out
- England would earn £100,000 in treasure, since exports are still large
By what percent do England's exports (£2,200,000) exceed its imports (£2,000,000) in card A, Noah asks?
- 9.1 percent, since £200,000 out of £2,200,000 of exports is 9.1 percent
- 1 percent, since £200,000 is one hundredth of the £2,000,000 of imports
- 100 percent, since the gap is £200,000 and the imports are £2,000,000
- 10 percent, since £200,000 is one tenth of the £2,000,000 of imports
Card B says Mun's book was most likely written between 1620 and 1630 and printed in 1664. How long after writing was it printed, Pia asks?
- Between 3.4 and 4.4 years, since 1664 minus 1630 is 3.4 and so on
- Exactly 44 years, since the book was written in 1620 and printed in 1664
- Between 24 and 34 years, since 1664 minus 1640 is 24 and 1664 minus 1630 is 34
- Between 34 and 44 years, since 1664 minus 1630 is 34 and 1664 minus 1620 is 44
Which new source would best test whether East India Company trade brought treasure home, Ren asks?
- A modern essay that repeats Mun's argument in new words for students of the topic
- A list of the men who served as directors of the company in 1620, with their dates
- A map of the routes that company ships used to reach Asia from London, drawn in the 1600s
- The company's account books, showing silver sent out and money from goods sold
Card A says exports are larger than imports by £200,000 a year. Who gains most under Mun's view, Zee asks?
- Each English worker, who receives an equal share of the £200,000 in treasure
- England as a whole, which gains treasure, though not each person equally
- The East India Company's ships, which lose the £200,000 when goods are sold
- The foreign countries, which keep the £200,000 in treasure that England pays