Zheng He's voyages and why Ming China turned inward
Grade 7 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Ships and winds (cards A to D; summaries in our words). Card A, ship sizes. The largest Ming treasure ship: sources differ, from about 70 m to more than 100 m, because a Ming record gives its size in old units that scholars convert differently. The usual Chinese trading junk before 1500: about 20 to 30 m. The Santa María, Columbus's largest ship (1492): about 19 m, an estimate, and the largest of his three small ships. Card B, the voyages: seven voyages between 1405 and 1433, each lasting up to about two years. Card C, historians: historians still debate the size of the ships, the size of the fleet and the purpose of the voyages. Card D, ocean winds: ships crossing the Indian Ocean depended on seasonal monsoon winds, which blow toward the west in winter and back toward the east in summer.
Card A gives the largest treasure ship as 70 m or more, and the Santa María as 19 m. At least how many times as long was the treasure ship, Luz asks?
- About 37 times as long, since 70 divided by 19 is about 37 in this case
- About 51 times as long, since 70 minus 19 is 51 and that gives the ratio
- Exactly 5 times as long, since the largest size, 100 m, divided by 19 is about 5
- At least 3 times as long, since even 70 divided by 19 is about 3.7
A student writes, "Zheng He's largest ship was exactly 130 m long." What in card A challenges that, Milo asks?
- Card A says the ship was 20 to 30 m, so 130 m is ten times too long
- Card A says the ship was 100 m, so 130 m is the sole wrong guess among the sizes in the card
- Card A says sources differ, from about 70 m to more than 100 m, so no length is settled
- Card A says the Santa María was about 19 m, so a 130 m ship is impossible
Card A says a Ming record gives the ship's size in old units. What should Noah do with that record?
- Trust the newest conversion, since newer scholars know more than older ones
- Ignore the record, since old units cannot be turned into meters
- Use one conversion and call it exact, since a Ming record is a reliable source
- Treat the converted size as a range, since scholars convert the units differently
The usual junk was 20 to 30 m and the largest treasure ship at least 70 m (card A). At least how many times as long as the longest junk was it, Pia asks?
- About 23 times as long, since 70 divided by 30 is about 23 in this case
- Exactly 3 times as long, since the largest size, 100 m, divided by 30 is about 3
- About 40 times as long, since 70 minus 30 is 40 and that gives the ratio
- At least 2 times as long, since even 70 divided by 30 is about 2.3
Card D says ships depended on monsoon winds. How does that help explain why a voyage lasted up to about two years, Ren asks?
- Monsoon winds blow toward the east in winter, so the ships went home first
- Winds blew steadily in one direction through the year, so ships sailed home at once
- Ships stopped to fight the winds in each port until storms ended each year
- Ships waited for the winds to turn before sailing home, so a round trip took long
Card B says seven voyages came between 1405 and 1433. On average, about how many years is that for each voyage, Tala asks?
- About 0.4 years, since 28 years divided by 7 voyages is 0.4
- About 21 years, since 28 years minus 7 voyages is 21
- About 4 years, since 28 years divided by 7 voyages is 4
- About 2 years, the length of a single voyage given in card B
Compare the Santa María (about 19 m) with the usual junk (20 to 30 m) in card A. Which statement is supported, Ari asks?
- The Santa María was far bigger than the usual Chinese junks of the time
- The Santa María was exactly the size of each Chinese junk before 1500
- The Santa María was a treasure ship, since it was the largest of Columbus's ships
- The Santa María was about the size of the smallest usual Chinese junks
Which new find would best settle the size of the largest treasure ships, Bo asks?
- A modern book that repeats card A's range in new words for readers today
- Remains of a treasure ship's hull or measured timbers from a dated 1400s shipyard
- A list of the foreign gifts that the fleets carried back to China
- A new poem from the 1400s that praises the beauty of the fleets and their ships at sea
Why might a Ming record give ship sizes in old units, Esme asks?
- It was written for foreign sailors, who needed sizes in a Chinese system
- It was written for scholars today, who prefer old units to meters
- It was written for readers of its own time, so we must convert the numbers
- It was written to hide the ships' size, so no one could ever convert the numbers
A student writes, "The fleet had exactly 300 ships." Why does card C challenge that, Jun asks?
- Card C says historians agree on a fleet of 300 ships, so the number is correct
- Historians still debate the fleet's size, so one exact number claims too much
- Card C says the ships were 70 m long, so the fleet could not have had 300 ships
- Card C says no one can know the size of the fleet, so any number is equally good