How helpful traits become more common over many generations
Grade 7 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Light moths rose from 6 to 30 per 100 as clean-air laws lightened the bark. Bo predicts the next years if the bark stays light. What fits?
- Back to 6 per 100, since moths change color each year
- 30 per 100, since the moths share one color
- More than 30 per 100, since matching moths have more young
- 100 per 100 by next year, in a single step
Esme spreads bacteria from the 3 colonies on Plate 2 onto a new plate with the same antibiotic. What will Plate 3 most likely show?
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew; Zone 3: Plate 3: bacteria from those 3 colonies, same antibiotic | ?. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew; Zone 3: Plate 3: bacteria from those 3 colonies, same antibiotic | ?. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data) Zone Plate Result Zone 1 Plate 1: no antibiotic bacteria cover the plate Zone 2 Plate 2: antibiotic added 3 small colonies grew Zone 3 Plate 3: bacteria from those 3 colonies, same antibiotic ? - Many colonies, since the bacteria became resistant when they met it
- Many colonies, since the 3 colonies came from resistant bacteria
- No growth, since the antibiotic stops bacteria of this kind
- Many colonies, since the medicine became weaker over time
Jun reads the moth chart. From 1959 to 1984, light moths went from 6 to 30 per 100 as trees regained their pale look. What explains it?
Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart. Year Light moths per 100 Row 1: 1959 6 Row 2: 1984 30 Bar graph 0 10 20 30 40 6 1959 30 1984 Year Light moths per 100 - The cleaner air made the moths grow lighter
- Dark moths turned light to match the bark
- The whole group switched to light in one year
- Light moths matched the bark, so more survived and had young
Kira reads the finch chart. After the wet year, the average beak depth fell from 9.4 mm to 9.1 mm. What explains it?
Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Seeds on the island | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1, before the wet year | many seeds, small and large | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2, after the wet year | many small seeds, few large hard seeds | 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Seeds on the island | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1, before the wet year | many seeds, small and large | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2, after the wet year | many small seeds, few large hard seeds | 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data) Generation Seeds on the island Average beak depth (mm) Generation 1, before the wet year many seeds, small and large 9.4 Generation 2, after the wet year many small seeds, few large hard seeds 9.1 - The wet weather made the beaks grow smaller
- Each finch's beak shrank to fit the small seeds
- The whole group had smaller beaks after one season
- Small-beaked finches had more young, so the average fell
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). On Plate 2 the antibiotic stopped most growth, but 3 colonies grew. Luz explains the 3 colonies. Which explanation fits?
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew, the rest of the plate is clear. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew, the rest of the plate is clear. Agar plate diagram Zone 1: Plate 1 Zone 2: Plate 2 no antibiotic bacteria cover the plate antibiotic added 3 small colonies grew; rest clear - The bacteria changed to resist it when it touched them
- The medicine wore off in those three spots
- The bacteria were alike, so the medicine missed three spots
- A few bacteria in the group could already grow with it
Milo reads that farmers saved seeds from wild cabbage plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them, year after year. Which kind of selection is this?
Wild cabbage and broccoli (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Step | Plants. Row 1: Start | wild cabbage plants with small flower buds. Row 2: What the farmers did | saved seeds from plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them. Row 3: Many years later | plants with much larger flower buds. Wild cabbage and broccoli (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Step | Plants. Row 1: Start | wild cabbage plants with small flower buds. Row 2: What the farmers did | saved seeds from plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them. Row 3: Many years later | plants with much larger flower buds. Wild cabbage and broccoli (model data) Step Plants 1 Start wild cabbage plants with small flower buds 2 What the farmers did saved seeds from plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them 3 Many years later plants with much larger flower buds - Natural selection: the weather chose which plants made seeds
- Artificial selection: the plants grew bigger buds on purpose
- Artificial selection: people chose which plants made seeds
- Natural selection: the plants changed to suit the farm
Noah reads that broccoli and kale both came from one wild cabbage plant. How did two different vegetables come from it?
From wild cabbage to vegetables (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Vegetable | Part people chose. Row 1: Wild cabbage | the one wild plant everything started from. Row 2: Broccoli | larger flowers and flower buds. Row 3: Kale | larger leaves. From wild cabbage to vegetables (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Vegetable | Part people chose. Row 1: Wild cabbage | the one wild plant everything started from. Row 2: Broccoli | larger flowers and flower buds. Row 3: Kale | larger leaves. From wild cabbage to vegetables (model data). Comparison chart Vegetable Part people chose 1. Wild cabbage the one wild plant everything started from 2. Broccoli larger flowers and flower buds 3. Kale larger leaves - The plants needed bigger leaves, so leaves grew bigger
- Each wild plant changed its leaves to suit farm soil
- People chose plants with the flowers or leaves they wanted, over generations
- One planting made the new vegetables at once
Ren compares the two rows of the moth chart. How many more light moths per 100 were there in 1984 than in 1959?
Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart. Year Light moths per 100 Row 1: 1959 6 Row 2: 1984 30 Bar graph 0 10 20 30 40 6 1959 30 1984 Year Light moths per 100 - 36 more per 100
- 24 more per 100
- 30 more per 100
- 6 more per 100
Tala compares the finch generations after the wet year. How did the average beak depth change from Generation 1 to Generation 2?
Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1 | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2 | 9.1. Bar graph: x axis Generation; y axis Average beak depth (mm), ticks every 2 from 0 to 10. Bars: Generation 1 9.4; Generation 2 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1 | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2 | 9.1. Bar graph: x axis Generation; y axis Average beak depth (mm), ticks every 2 from 0 to 10. Bars: Generation 1 9.4; Generation 2 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data) Generation Average beak depth (mm) Generation 1 9.4 Generation 2 9.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 9.4 Generation 1 9.1 Generation 2 Generation Average beak depth (mm) - 3.0 mm shallower
- 0.3 mm deeper
- 0.7 mm shallower
- 0.3 mm shallower
Zee counts colonies on two plates with the same antibiotic. How many times as many colonies grew on Plate 3 as on Plate 2?
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 colonies grew; Zone 2: Plate 3: bacteria from those colonies, same antibiotic | 150 colonies grew. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 colonies grew; Zone 2: Plate 3: bacteria from those colonies, same antibiotic | 150 colonies grew. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data) Zone 1 Plate 2: antibiotic added 3 colonies grew Zone 2 Plate 3: bacteria from those colonies, same antibiotic 150 colonies grew - 50 times as many
- 5 times as many
- 450 times as many
- 147 times as many