How helpful traits become more common over many generations
Grade 7 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
A wet year left many small seeds and few large, hard seeds. Ari predicts the next generation's average beak depth. Which prediction fits?
- 9.1 mm, since small-beaked finches had more young
- 9.4 mm, since the finches share one beak depth
- 6.0 mm, since the whole group changed in one generation
- 9.0 mm, since each finch shrank its own beak
Light moths rose from 6 to 30 per 100 as clean-air laws lightened the bark. Bo predicts the next years if the bark stays light. What fits?
Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart. Year Light moths per 100 Row 1: 1959 6 Row 2: 1984 30 Bar graph 0 10 20 30 40 6 1959 30 1984 Year Light moths per 100 - 30 per 100, since the moths share one color
- Back to 6 per 100, since moths change color each year
- 100 per 100 by next year, in a single step
- More than 30 per 100, since matching moths have more young
Esme spreads bacteria from the 3 colonies on Plate 2 onto a new plate with the same antibiotic. What will Plate 3 most likely show?
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew; Zone 3: Plate 3: bacteria from those 3 colonies, same antibiotic | ?. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew; Zone 3: Plate 3: bacteria from those 3 colonies, same antibiotic | ?. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data) Zone Plate Result Zone 1 Plate 1: no antibiotic bacteria cover the plate Zone 2 Plate 2: antibiotic added 3 small colonies grew Zone 3 Plate 3: bacteria from those 3 colonies, same antibiotic ? - Many colonies, since the 3 colonies came from resistant bacteria
- Many colonies, since the medicine became weaker over time
- No growth, since the antibiotic stops bacteria of this kind
- Many colonies, since the bacteria became resistant when they met it
Jun reads the moth chart. From 1959 to 1984, light moths went from 6 to 30 per 100 as trees regained their pale look. What explains it?
Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart, columns: Year | Light moths per 100. Row 1: 1959 | 6. Row 2: 1984 | 30. Bar graph: x axis Year; y axis Light moths per 100, ticks every 10 from 0 to 40. Bars: 1959 6; 1984 30. Peppered moths and the Clean Air Act (real data: Christ's College Cambridge Darwin200 page). Comparison chart. Year Light moths per 100 Row 1: 1959 6 Row 2: 1984 30 Bar graph 0 10 20 30 40 6 1959 30 1984 Year Light moths per 100 - The cleaner air made the moths grow lighter
- The whole group switched to light in one year
- Light moths matched the bark, so more survived and had young
- Dark moths turned light to match the bark
Kira reads the finch chart. After the wet year, the average beak depth fell from 9.4 mm to 9.1 mm. What explains it?
Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Seeds on the island | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1, before the wet year | many seeds, small and large | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2, after the wet year | many small seeds, few large hard seeds | 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Seeds on the island | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1, before the wet year | many seeds, small and large | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2, after the wet year | many small seeds, few large hard seeds | 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data) Generation Seeds on the island Average beak depth (mm) Generation 1, before the wet year many seeds, small and large 9.4 Generation 2, after the wet year many small seeds, few large hard seeds 9.1 - Small-beaked finches had more young, so the average fell
- Each finch's beak shrank to fit the small seeds
- The whole group had smaller beaks after one season
- The wet weather made the beaks grow smaller
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). On Plate 2 the antibiotic stopped most growth, but 3 colonies grew. Luz explains the 3 colonies. Which explanation fits?
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew, the rest of the plate is clear. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 1: no antibiotic | bacteria cover the plate; Zone 2: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 small colonies grew, the rest of the plate is clear. Agar plate diagram Zone 1: Plate 1 Zone 2: Plate 2 no antibiotic bacteria cover the plate antibiotic added 3 small colonies grew; rest clear - The bacteria changed to resist it when it touched them
- A few bacteria in the group could already grow with it
- The bacteria were alike, so the medicine missed three spots
- The medicine wore off in those three spots
Milo reads that farmers saved seeds from wild cabbage plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them, year after year. Which kind of selection is this?
Wild cabbage and broccoli (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Step | Plants. Row 1: Start | wild cabbage plants with small flower buds. Row 2: What the farmers did | saved seeds from plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them. Row 3: Many years later | plants with much larger flower buds. Wild cabbage and broccoli (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Step | Plants. Row 1: Start | wild cabbage plants with small flower buds. Row 2: What the farmers did | saved seeds from plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them. Row 3: Many years later | plants with much larger flower buds. Wild cabbage and broccoli (model data) Step Plants 1 Start wild cabbage plants with small flower buds 2 What the farmers did saved seeds from plants with the biggest flower buds and replanted them 3 Many years later plants with much larger flower buds - Artificial selection: people chose which plants made seeds
- Natural selection: the plants changed to suit the farm
- Artificial selection: the plants grew bigger buds on purpose
- Natural selection: the weather chose which plants made seeds
Pia sorts cases into natural selection and artificial selection. Which case is natural selection?
- A class kept seeds from the reddest radishes for a fair
- A farmer planted seeds from the curliest kale
- A gardener saved seeds from the tallest sunflowers
- Light moths matched pale bark and left more young
Tala compares the finch generations after the wet year. How did the average beak depth change from Generation 1 to Generation 2?
Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1 | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2 | 9.1. Bar graph: x axis Generation; y axis Average beak depth (mm), ticks every 2 from 0 to 10. Bars: Generation 1 9.4; Generation 2 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data). Comparison chart, columns: Generation | Average beak depth (mm). Row 1: Generation 1 | 9.4. Row 2: Generation 2 | 9.1. Bar graph: x axis Generation; y axis Average beak depth (mm), ticks every 2 from 0 to 10. Bars: Generation 1 9.4; Generation 2 9.1. Model finches after a wet year (model data) Generation Average beak depth (mm) Generation 1 9.4 Generation 2 9.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 9.4 Generation 1 9.1 Generation 2 Generation Average beak depth (mm) - 3.0 mm shallower
- 0.3 mm shallower
- 0.7 mm shallower
- 0.3 mm deeper
Zee counts colonies on two plates with the same antibiotic. How many times as many colonies grew on Plate 3 as on Plate 2?
Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 colonies grew; Zone 2: Plate 3: bacteria from those colonies, same antibiotic | 150 colonies grew. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data). Agar plate diagram, zones: Zone 1: Plate 2: antibiotic added | 3 colonies grew; Zone 2: Plate 3: bacteria from those colonies, same antibiotic | 150 colonies grew. Lab plates with an antibiotic (model data) Zone 1 Plate 2: antibiotic added 3 colonies grew Zone 2 Plate 3: bacteria from those colonies, same antibiotic 150 colonies grew - 50 times as many
- 450 times as many
- 147 times as many
- 5 times as many