Why countries trade, and what tariffs, quotas and embargoes do
Grade 7 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Why countries trade (cards A to C; summaries in our words). Card A, a model built on an example in the English economist David Ricardo's book of 1817 (Ricardo's two goods were cloth and wine; this card uses cloth and olive oil). To make one year's supply of cloth, England needed 100 workers and Portugal needed 90. To make one year's supply of olive oil, England needed 120 workers and Portugal needed 80. Card B, about the writer: Ricardo argued that countries gain when each makes the goods it can make at the lowest cost compared with its other goods, and then trades. He favored freer trade, including trade in grain. Card C, Friedrich List, a German economist, in a book of 1841: he argued that a country just starting its factories may need to tax imports for a while, so that its young industries can grow.
Use card A. How many more workers than Portugal does England need to make a year's olive oil, Ari asks?
- 200 more workers
- 30 more workers
- 10 more workers
- 40 more workers
Use card A. Which country needs fewer workers for both goods, Bo asks?
- Neither, since each country is cheaper at one good than the other
- England, which needs fewer workers for cloth (100 against 90)
- Portugal, which needs fewer workers for both cloth and olive oil
- England, since it needs more workers and so gives more people jobs
In England, 120 workers could make a year's olive oil or 1.2 years' cloth instead. How much cloth does Portugal give up for olive oil, Esme asks?
- About 0.09 of a year's cloth
- About 1.1 of a year's cloth
- About 0.9 of a year's cloth
- About 1.2 of a year's cloth
Use card A. Which country gives up less cloth to make olive oil, so that olive oil is its cheaper trade good, Jun asks?
- England, since it needs more workers and so makes more olive oil
- Portugal, which gives up about 0.9 of a year's cloth, against England's 1.2
- England, which gives up about 0.9 of a year's cloth, against Portugal's 1.2
- Both give up the same amount, since each needs a year of work
A student says, "Card A shows Portugal should make everything and trade with no one." How strong is that claim, Kira asks?
- Strong: card B says each country should make its own goods for itself
- Strong: Portugal needs fewer workers for both goods, so it gains nothing from trade
- Weak: card B says gains come from comparing costs between goods, then trading
- Weak: one example in a book cannot be used to show how trade works
Why did Ricardo use the cloth-and-olive oil example, Milo asks?
- To show that countries can gain from trade and to favor freer trade
- To show that English cloth was the finest made in Europe
- To teach sailors how to sail between England and Portugal
- To record the exact wages paid to workers in England and Portugal in 1817
Ricardo's book came out in 1817 and List's in 1841. How many years later was List's, Pia asks?
- 14 years later
- 34 years later
- 3,658 years later
- 24 years later
Each country now makes one year's cloth and one year's olive oil. England uses 100 plus 120 workers. If England puts all of them into cloth, how many years' cloth is that, Ren asks?
- 22 years' cloth
- 2.2 years' cloth
- 2 years' cloth
- 1.2 years' cloth
A new record shows a young German factory grew while imports were taxed. What does it do for List's argument, Tala asks?
- It shows nothing, because a single factory is too small to matter much
- It shows that Ricardo's example had the wrong numbers in it
- It fits List's argument, but one case cannot show it holds elsewhere
- It shows that List was right for each country and each industry
A student says, "Card C shows Ricardo's numbers were wrong." How strong is that claim, Zee asks?
- Weak: card C gives a view on protecting young industries, not new numbers
- Strong: any economist who disagrees with Ricardo shows his figures were wrong
- Strong: List wrote after Ricardo, so he must have corrected the figures
- Weak: List was a German economist, so his views cannot be compared with Ricardo's