Apply the Bill of Rights to real Supreme Court cases

Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

NameDate

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Miranda v. Arizona (decided June 13, 1966)

    Box Facts: four cases in which people held by police were questioned without a full warning of their rights; their statements were used against them at trial. Box Question: Must police warn people in custody of their Fifth Amendment rights before questioning?. Box Holding (5 to 4): yes: without warnings, statements from custodial questioning cannot be used. Box Right and power: Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, limiting police, who carry out the laws. Arrows: from Facts to Question: raise; from Question to Holding: answered by. Line 1 (Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436 (1966)): "He must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires." Below the diagram: custodial questioning means questioning by officers after a person is taken into custody.

  2. What had happened in each of the four cases, Luz asks?

    • Questioned without a full warning
    • Given a lawyer at once
    • Freed without questions
    • Suspended from school
  3. What was the vote in Miranda, Milo asks?

    • 7 to 2
    • 5 to 4
    • 4 to 5
    • 9 to 0
  4. What did the Court hold, Noah asks?

    • Police may question with no warning
    • Statements without warnings can't be used
    • Judges, not police, must do the questioning
    • Each statement must be used at trial
  5. By line 1, what is a person told first about speaking, Pia asks?

    • The right to remain silent
    • The duty to answer each question
    • The right to free speech at school
    • The right to a quick trial
  6. By line 1, what if a person cannot afford an attorney, Ren asks?

    • The person must go without
    • The trial is canceled
    • Police will act as the lawyer
    • One will be appointed first
  7. Which case protects the right to a lawyer for those who cannot afford one at trial, Zee asks?

    • Miranda v. Arizona alone
    • Gideon v. Wainwright
    • Tinker v. Des Moines
    • Betts v. Brady
  8. Which amendment and power does Miranda pair, Ari asks?

    • The Fifth, limiting police
    • The First, limiting schools
    • The Sixth, limiting Congress
    • The Tenth, limiting states
  9. Put the three cases in order of decision, Bo asks?

    • Tinker, Gideon, Miranda
    • Gideon, Tinker, Miranda
    • Gideon, Miranda, Tinker
    • Miranda, Tinker, Gideon
  10. Jun's note says, "Miranda was decided unanimously." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: like Gideon
    • Change Miranda to Betts
    • Change unanimously to 5 to 4
    • Change it to 7 to 2
  11. Kira's note says, "Police may use any statement, warned or not." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: statements are evidence
    • Change warned to paid
    • Change police to teachers
    • Change it: not without warnings
PencilGopencilgo.com

Apply the Bill of Rights to real Supreme Court cases

Answer Key - Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.

  1. Read this first

    Miranda v. Arizona (decided June 13, 1966)

    Box Facts: four cases in which people held by police were questioned without a full warning of their rights; their statements were used against them at trial. Box Question: Must police warn people in custody of their Fifth Amendment rights before questioning?. Box Holding (5 to 4): yes: without warnings, statements from custodial questioning cannot be used. Box Right and power: Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, limiting police, who carry out the laws. Arrows: from Facts to Question: raise; from Question to Holding: answered by. Line 1 (Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436 (1966)): "He must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires." Below the diagram: custodial questioning means questioning by officers after a person is taken into custody.

  2. What had happened in each of the four cases, Luz asks?

    • Questioned without a full warning
    • Given a lawyer at once
    • Freed without questions
    • Suspended from school
  3. What was the vote in Miranda, Milo asks?

    • 7 to 2
    • 5 to 4
    • 4 to 5
    • 9 to 0
  4. What did the Court hold, Noah asks?

    • Police may question with no warning
    • Statements without warnings can't be used
    • Judges, not police, must do the questioning
    • Each statement must be used at trial
  5. By line 1, what is a person told first about speaking, Pia asks?

    • The right to remain silent
    • The duty to answer each question
    • The right to free speech at school
    • The right to a quick trial
  6. By line 1, what if a person cannot afford an attorney, Ren asks?

    • The person must go without
    • The trial is canceled
    • Police will act as the lawyer
    • One will be appointed first
  7. Which case protects the right to a lawyer for those who cannot afford one at trial, Zee asks?

    • Miranda v. Arizona alone
    • Gideon v. Wainwright
    • Tinker v. Des Moines
    • Betts v. Brady
  8. Which amendment and power does Miranda pair, Ari asks?

    • The Fifth, limiting police
    • The First, limiting schools
    • The Sixth, limiting Congress
    • The Tenth, limiting states
  9. Put the three cases in order of decision, Bo asks?

    • Tinker, Gideon, Miranda
    • Gideon, Tinker, Miranda
    • Gideon, Miranda, Tinker
    • Miranda, Tinker, Gideon
  10. Jun's note says, "Miranda was decided unanimously." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: like Gideon
    • Change Miranda to Betts
    • Change unanimously to 5 to 4
    • Change it to 7 to 2
  11. Kira's note says, "Police may use any statement, warned or not." Which fix is right?

    • Leave it: statements are evidence
    • Change warned to paid
    • Change police to teachers
    • Change it: not without warnings