Factories, cities and new immigrants in the North
Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Regions in 1860 (cards A to C). Card A, the Preliminary Report on the Eighth Census (published in 1862, during the Civil War, by the Census Office for Congress; spacing modernized, one hyphenated word joined): "It is due to candor to state that the marked disproportion between the rate of gain in the north and south respectively, is manifestly to some extent caused by the larger number of immigrants who settle in the former section, on account of congeniality of climate, the variety of occupation, the dignity wherewith respectable employment is invested, and the freedom of labor." Just before this, the report gives the population gain from 1850 to 1860: 41.24 percent in the nineteen free states, seven territories and the District of Columbia together, and 27.33 percent in the fifteen slaveholding states. In those fifteen states about 3.95 million of 12.24 million people were enslaved. Card B, the same report, Table 33, titled "Approximate statistics of the Products of Industry for the year ending June 1, 1860" (rounded by us). New England: about 19,500 shops and factories; about 403,000 workers (267,000 men and 135,000 women); goods worth about $494 million. Middle States (with Delaware, Maryland and the District of Columbia): about 52,400; 622,000 workers (503,000 men and 120,000 women); $804 million. Western States (with Kentucky and Missouri): about 34,300; 222,000 workers (205,000 men and 18,000 women); $390 million. Southern States: about 18,000; 110,000 workers (99,000 men and 11,000 women); $145 million. Pacific States: about 4,100; 27,000 workers (27,000 men and 500 women); $63 million. Whole nation: about 128,300; 1,385,000 workers; $1.9 billion. The report's leading products: flour and meal, $224 million; cotton goods, $115 million; lumber, $96 million; boots and shoes, $90 million. Card C, sources on the Erie Canal, which opened in 1825 (each source's own figures): the New York State Museum says that from 1815 to 1825 the cost of shipping wheat from Buffalo to New York City dropped from roughly $100 to $10 per ton, and that wheat, flour and lumber were the biggest cargo by tonnage all century. American Heritage says costs fell from $100 per ton to under $9 and that within 15 years New York was the busiest port in the nation, handling more commerce than New Orleans, Baltimore and Boston combined. A City University of New York page says the cost per ton fell from $90 to $4 and the trip from New York to Buffalo shortened from three weeks to eight days.
Card A is the Census Office's explanation, published in 1862 during the Civil War. What should a student keep in mind about it, Ari asks?
- It was written by southern officials, so it reflects the views of the slaveholding states
- It is one office's view during a war, so check the numbers and the explanation separately
- It is worthless because the government wrote it, so even its numbers should be thrown out
- It is neutral because it uses numbers, so the explanation in it needs no checking
Card A gives population gains of 41.24 percent in the free states and 27.33 percent in the slaveholding states. How much higher was the first rate, Bo asks?
- About 69 percentage points
- About 27 percentage points
- About 14 percentage points
- About 1.4 percentage points
A student writes: "Card A proves immigration was the only cause of the faster growth in the free states." How strong is that claim, Esme asks?
- Weak: card A says immigrants did not matter to the free states' growth
- Overstated: card A says immigration caused the gap only "to some extent"
- Weak: card A is a table of goods, not of people, so it cannot show a cause
- Strong: card A says immigrants caused all of the gap in the growth rates
Card A lists "the freedom of labor" as a reason immigrants settled in the north. What does that show about the report, Jun asks?
- It shows the writer had no view, since the report just lists plain facts about each section
- It names free labor as one reason immigrants went north, a claim to test against their own words
- It settles that immigrants cared about free labor alone when they chose where to settle in America
- It shows slavery did not matter to anyone who chose where to live in the United States at the time
Dividing each section's goods by its workers, which section made the most per worker in card B, Kira asks?
- Western States, at about $1,760 per worker
- Middle States, at about $1,290 per worker
- Pacific States, at about $2,300 per worker
- New England, at about $1,230 per worker
A student writes: "Western workers were more productive than New England workers." How strong is that claim, given card B, Luz asks?
- Partly supported: goods per worker were higher in the West, but value of goods is not productivity
- Fully proved: the Western section's goods per worker are higher, so its workers were more productive
- Unsupported: card B lists no workers in the Western section, so goods per worker cannot be found
- Disproved: New England made more goods overall, so each New England worker must have made more
The three sources on the Erie Canal give different costs. What do they support together, Noah asks?
- Shipping costs rose after 1825, so New York's merchants sent less wheat by canal
- The three sources give identical figures, showing a drop from $100 to $10 per ton in each case
- They conflict, so the canal did not lower costs and the sources cannot be trusted
- Shipping costs fell sharply, by about 90 percent or more, though the exact figures differ
The New York State Museum says wheat shipping fell from roughly $100 to $10 per ton. About what percent drop is that, Pia asks?
- About 9 percent
- About 90 percent
- About 10 percent
- About $90 per ton, a rate and not a percent
Which chain from card C is best supported, Tala asks?
- The canal's opening in 1825 ended overland shipping, and wagons and roads were no longer needed
- The canal's tolls caused the price of wheat to rise, so trade moved away from the canal to other ports
- Cheaper shipping drew trade, and within 15 years New York handled more commerce than three ports combined
- New York became the busiest port in the nation, which then caused the canal to be built and opened
Which new evidence would best test whether the canal caused New York's rise, Zee asks?
- The 1860 table of goods by section, which compares the regions of the country
- New York's population growth after 1825, taken alone as proof of the canal's effect
- Port records of cargo before and after 1825, compared with other ports
- A painting of the canal's opening in 1825, showing the crowds on the first day