Inventions that changed how goods and people moved
Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
The cotton gin and slavery, 1793 to 1860 (cards A to D). Card A, Eli Whitney in letters to his father (quoted by the National Archives; as printed): "One man and a horse will do more than fifty men with the old machines," and "Tis generally said by those who know anything about it, that I shall make a Fortune by it." Card B, a summary in our words of a National Archives lesson adapted from an article by a teacher: Whitney received a patent in 1794; his idea drew on earlier gins and on ideas from others, including Catherine Greene and enslaved laborers, whom some say were the rightful inventors. After the gin, the yield of raw cotton doubled each decade after 1800. The gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, but not the labor of growing and picking cotton; cotton became so profitable that planters wanted more land and more enslaved workers. In 1790 there were six slave states and in 1860 there were fifteen. From 1790 until Congress banned the slave trade from Africa in 1808, Southerners imported 80,000 Africans. By 1860 about one in three Southerners was enslaved. Card C, a summary in our words from the Census Bureau: the census counted the enslaved population as 697,897 in 1790 in one sentence of the Bureau's page, and 697,624 in 1790 in another; 1,538,022 in 1820; 3,204,313 in 1850; and 3,953,760 in 1860, when the census last counted them. Card D, a summary in our words from the SlaveVoyages database essay by historian David Eltis: by 1850 the United States produced most of the world's cotton, yet its cotton planters drew on Africa for almost none of their labor, relying on natural population growth.
Card A is Whitney writing to his father. What is it best evidence for, Ari asks?
- What Whitney hoped his machine would do and earn
- How the gin changed Southern farming by 1860
- What enslaved workers thought of the gin and its inventor
- How many people were enslaved in 1793
Card B is a National Archives lesson adapted from a teacher's article. How should Luz use it?
- As a summary of effects, with its numbers checked against card C
- As a primary source written by someone alive in 1793
- As an eyewitness report from someone working in Whitney's workshop
- Ignore it, since a teacher wrote part of it and not a historian
Cards B and C both cover 1790 to 1860. What do they support together, Tala asks?
- The enslaved population doubled every decade from 1790 to 1860
- Together they prove that the gin alone caused all of the growth in slavery
- Both rose together, which fits a link but does not prove one cause
- Cotton output fell after 1800 while the enslaved population kept rising
Card C counts 1,538,022 enslaved people in 1820 and 3,204,313 in 1850. About how many times as many, over how long, Jun asks?
- About 5 times as many, over 30 years
- About twice as many, over 10 years
- About twice as many, over 30 years
- About 20 percent more, over 30 years
A student says: "The gin ended the need for enslaved labor." How strong is that claim, given cards A and B, Pia asks?
- Strong: card B says slavery ended in 1808, when Congress banned the slave trade
- Strong: card A says one man and a horse do the work of fifty, so fewer workers were needed
- Weak: card B says seed removal got easier, but growing and picking still needed workers
- Weak: card A says the gin needed more workers to clean seeds than the old machines
Card B says some argue others were the rightful inventors. What does that show about the usual story, Bo asks?
- The usual story credits one man, but some say others also contributed
- Whitney invented nothing himself and just copied others' work
- Whitney's own letters settle that the idea was entirely his alone, not shared
- Catherine Greene was an enslaved worker who helped build the gin
Which chain from card B best explains how the gin increased slavery, Milo asks?
- The gin picked the cotton as well as cleaning it, so far fewer workers were needed
- Slavery grew first, and that demand for labor led to the invention of the gin
- The gin made cotton profitable, so planters wanted more land and enslaved workers
- The 1808 ban on importing Africans led planters to build the gin
Card B says there were six slave states in 1790 and fifteen in 1860. How many more, and how many times as many, Zee asks?
- 21 more, about 3.5 times as many
- 9 more, about 250 percent more
- 9 states in total, since 15 minus 6 is 9
- 9 more, about two and a half times as many
Which new evidence would best test whether the gin, rather than other causes, raised slavery's growth, Ren asks?
- Accounts of the Civil War written in the 1860s by soldiers
- A modern article that says the gin was the cause of slavery's growth
- A drawing of Whitney's patent showing how the gin worked
- County records of cotton acreage and enslaved counts, year by year
Card B says 80,000 Africans were imported from 1790 to 1808. Card D says planters relied on natural growth. What do they suggest, Noah asks?
- Imports were a small part of the rise to nearly 4 million; most growth was internal
- That no Africans were imported to the United States at any point after 1790
- That imports of Africans caused most of the rise in the enslaved population by 1860
- That natural growth means enslaved families were set free as their numbers rose