Life under slavery, resistance and the Underground Railroad

Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.

1. Read this first

   Use this

   Learning to read, and who tells the story (cards A to D). Card A, from Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Written by Himself (Boston: published at the Anti-Slavery Office, 1845), as printed on Documenting the American South: Douglass describes the day he overheard Hugh Auld tell his wife not to teach him to read. Auld said: "It would forever unfit him to be a slave." and "It would make him discontented and unhappy." Douglass wrote: "From that moment, I understood the pathway from slavery to freedom." and "Though conscious of the difficulty of learning without a teacher, I set out with high hope, and a fixed purpose, at whatever cost of trouble, to learn how to read." He says he was "probably between seven and eight years old" when he went to live with the Aulds in Baltimore, and that he lived in Hugh Auld's household for about seven years. He estimated that he was now "between twenty-seven and twenty-eight years of age" when he wrote. Card B, from later in the same Narrative: "I would at times feel that learning to read had been a curse rather than a blessing." and "The more I read, the more I was led to abhor and detest my enslavers." Card C, from the Narrative's preface, dated May 1, 1845, by the abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison: "I am confident that it is essentially true in all its statements; that nothing has been set down in malice, nothing exaggerated, nothing drawn from the imagination; that it comes short of the reality, rather than overstates a single fact in regard to SLAVERY AS IT IS." Card D, a summary in our words from Norman R. Yetman of the University of Kansas, in the Library of Congress Information Bulletin (April 2001), about the Federal Writers' Project interviews of former slaves: they were recorded in 17 states during 1936 to 1938 and number "more than 2,300". Those interviewed "ranged in age from 1 to 50 at the time of emancipation in 1865, which meant that more than two-thirds were over 80 when they were interviewed." The collection is "not a representative sample of the slave population," but "a remarkably diverse and inclusive cross section of former slaves". The interviewers, after the national office took charge, were "almost exclusively white", and Yetman writes that "it is probable that in many instances caste etiquette led ex-slaves to tell white interviewers" "what they wanted to hear." The project director John Lomax told interviewers: "It should be remembered that the Federal Writers' Project is not interested in taking sides on any question. The worker should not censor any materials collected regardless of its [sic] nature." An earlier evaluation of Georgia narratives said that Black interviewers appeared "able to gain better insight" and that their interviews were "less tinged with glamour." Yetman calls the narratives "an illuminating and invaluable source".

2. 1.

   Card C is a preface by the abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison. What is it best evidence for, Ari asks?

   • Independent proof that each detail in the Narrative is true as written
   • That supporters vouched for the book, though an endorsement is not proof
   • Nothing, because a friend of the author wrote it for him in 1845
   • A later historian's careful check of the facts that the Narrative reports
3. 2.

   Card A says the Narrative was "published at the Anti-Slavery Office" in Boston in 1845. Who was it aimed at, and why, Bo asks?

   • Slaveholders, as a manual for managing enslaved people
   • No reader, because it was a private diary kept for the author alone
   • Readers in the North, to persuade them against slavery
   • Courts, as a legal filing
4. 3.

   In card A, Auld and Douglass react to the same idea, teaching an enslaved child to read. How do their views connect, Esme asks?

   • Auld and Douglass wanted the same result
   • Auld thought reading would help Douglass; Douglass thought it would harm him
   • They disagreed about whether reading mattered to slavery
   • Both saw reading as a threat to slavery; Auld feared it, Douglass welcomed it
5. 4.

   A student says: "Learning to read made life easier for Douglass." How strong is that claim, given cards A and B, Jun asks?

   • Weak: card B says he sometimes felt reading was "a curse rather than a blessing"
   • Strong: card A calls reading the pathway from slavery to freedom, so it made life easier
   • Strong: card A shows gladness alone, so reading brought him no pain whatever
   • Strong: he published a book about his life in 1845, so reading helped him
6. 5.

   Cards A and B both describe what reading did for Douglass. What do they support together, Kira asks?

   • Card A says reading brought pain alone, and card B says hope alone
   • They contradict each other, so one of the two passages must be false
   • Reading changed how he saw slavery, as hope in card A and as pain in card B
   • Both passages say that reading ended his enslavement once he had learned to read
7. 6.

   Card D: most people interviewed in 1936 to 1938 were over 80. What does that make their accounts best evidence for, Luz asks?

   • How many people were enslaved in the United States in the year 1860
   • Exact records of daily life that were written down during the years of slavery itself
   • What the informants themselves thought and felt in the year 1865
   • Memories of slavery from people who were young then and elderly when interviewed
8. 7.

   Card D: emancipation was 1865 and interviews were in 1936 to 1938. About how old in 1937 was someone who was 5 in 1865, Milo asks?

   • About 77, so their memories of that time are exact and complete
   • About 5, which is the age of the child at emancipation in 1865
   • About 72, found by subtracting 1865 from 1937 and stopping there
   • About 77, so their memories of slavery were a child's memories
9. 8.

   A student says: "The interviews show what a typical enslaved person thought." How strong is that claim, given card D, Noah asks?

   • Weak: card D says the group is "not a representative sample"
   • Strong: there are more than 2,300 interviews, which is a very large group
   • Strong: card D calls the narratives invaluable, so they show what is typical
   • Weak: card D says each informant was over 80 when interviewed
10. 9.

    Card A reports Auld's words. Who is reporting them, and what is the limit, Ren asks?

    • A court clerk who wrote down the words at the time of the event
    • A historian summarizing what Auld had said to his wife long ago
    • Douglass, writing in 1845 about his boyhood, reporting words he remembered
    • Auld himself, speaking in a written record that he kept at the time of the scene
11. 10.

    Lomax told interviewers not to "censor any materials." Why does that not settle how good the evidence is, Tala asks?

    • It shows that each informant told the whole truth to each interviewer
    • It shows that the interviews were held in 17 states across the South
    • It shows that Lomax censored the narratives before they were printed
    • It shows the project's aim, but informants may have said what interviewers wanted