Life under slavery, resistance and the Underground Railroad
Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Counting enslaved and free Black people, 1790 to 1860 (cards A to D). Card A, from the Census Office's Preliminary Report on the Eighth Census (1862), which says "slaves" and "free colored" (we say enslaved people and free Black people): in 1790 there were 697,897 enslaved and 59,466 free, a total of 757,363. In 1820: 1,538,038 enslaved, 233,524 free, total 1,771,562. In 1840: 2,487,455 enslaved, 386,303 free, total 2,873,758. In 1850: 3,204,313 enslaved, 434,449 free, total 3,638,762. In 1860: 3,953,587 enslaved, 482,122 free, total 4,435,709. Card B, from the same report: "the total increase of the free colored and slaves for 70 years was but 485 per cent, against 757 per cent, for the whites" and "the total number of slaves in 1860 should have been 4,130,000, had they gained at the same ratio as during the preceding ten years". Card C, a summary in our words from a Census Bureau working paper by Campbell Gibson and Kay Jung (2002, Table 1): it gives 697,681 enslaved and 59,527 free Black people in 1790, and 3,953,760 enslaved and 488,070 free Black people in 1860, out of a total United States population of 31,443,321 in 1860. It says "the racial categories used in the decennial census have reflected social usage rather than an attempt to define race biologically or genetically" and "From 1790 to 1850, the only categories recorded were White and Black (Negro), with Black designated as free and slave". Card D, a summary in our words from the National Archives on the 1850 and 1860 census records: "Enslaved people are listed statistically by the enslaver." For free Black households, the records list "free Black Americans by name of head of household" and "All other members are tallied statistically but unnamed".
Card B quotes the Census Office's own 1862 report. What is it best evidence for, Ari asks?
- How enslaved people described their own lives in their own words
- A later historian's opinion of the census
- What census officials counted and concluded in 1862
- A complete and exact count of each person
Card A, 1860: 3,953,587 enslaved and 482,122 free Black people. About what share of the Black population was enslaved, Esme asks?
- About 89 percent
- About 89 percent in each state
- About 8.9 percent
- About 11 percent, the free Black share
A student writes: "The free Black population stayed about the same size from 1790 to 1860." How strong is that claim, given card A, Jun asks?
- Strong: card B says the whites gained 38 percent
- Strong: card A lists free Black people in both years of the census report
- Weak: card A shows it grew about eightfold, from 59,466 to 482,122
- Strong: both counts are small beside the enslaved population
Cards A and C both give the 1860 count of enslaved people: 3,953,587 and 3,953,760. How should a reader treat the gap, Kira asks?
- They differ by thousands of enslaved people, which is a large gap in the counts
- The counts differ, so neither of them can be used as evidence at all
- Card C proves that the count in card A was simply wrong in 1860
- Both are official counts that differ by only 173, so the picture is the same
Card C says the census categories "reflected social usage rather than an attempt to define race biologically." What does that tell us, Luz asks?
- They were scientifically exact and were based on careful measurement of people
- They changed from one census year to the next as new groups arrived
- They were chosen by the people who were counted by the census takers
- They came from how people of the time sorted one another, not from science
Card D says enslaved people are "listed statistically by the enslaver." What does that mean for these records as evidence, Milo asks?
- They are a historian's list that was made years later from other records
- They give counts reported under the enslaver's name, not the enslaved people's words
- They name each enslaved person, with the full story of each person
- They are useless as evidence, because enslavers were the people who made the records of that time
Card A: free Black people were 59,466 of 757,363 in 1790 and 482,122 of 4,435,709 in 1860. How did the free share change, Noah asks?
- It fell from about 11 percent to about 8 percent
- It more than doubled
- It rose from about 8 percent to about 89 percent
- It rose from about 8 percent to about 11 percent
A student says: "The 1860 count was just what the Census Office expected." How strong is that claim, given cards A and B, Pia asks?
- Strong: card A shows that the number rose in each decade of the period
- Weak: card B expected 4,130,000, and the count was about 176,000 lower
- Weak: the count was about 1.76 million lower than the figure that was expected
- Strong: card B expected 3,953,587, which is the same as the count
Card A: enslaved people numbered 2,487,455 (1840), 3,204,313 (1850) and 3,953,587 (1860). Which decade added more people, and which grew faster, Ren asks?
- 1840 to 1850 added more people and also grew faster than the next decade did
- 1850-60 added more people (749,000 to 717,000), but 1840-50 grew faster (29 to 23 percent)
- In 1850 to 1860 more people were added and the growth rate was also faster, by a wider margin than before
- Both decades added about 7 million people, and both grew at the same rate
Card B says the total increase for 70 years was "485 per cent." Does card A agree, using 757,363 in 1790 and 4,435,709 in 1860, Tala asks?
- Yes, which is enough to conclude that each count was exact
- Yes: the total rose by about 486 percent
- No: the total rose by about 586 percent
- No: the report counts enslaved people alone