Is the reasoning sound and the evidence enough?
Grade 9 Reading Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
A Tool Shelf for the Ashby Library (letter to the editor)
[1] I am writing to ask the Ashby Public Library to set aside one shelf near the front desk for tools that residents could borrow with a library card. [2] My claim is simple: a tool shelf would save local families money, and it would be used often enough to earn its place in the building.
[3] Last spring the library in nearby Corwin started a tool shelf with forty items, including drills, ladders, sanders and a pressure washer. [4] According to the Corwin library's own records, residents borrowed those forty tools 310 times between April and September. [5] A new cordless drill costs about ninety dollars at a hardware store, while borrowing one from the library would cost a family nothing. [6] The Ashby library already owns a sturdy steel shelf that has stood empty in its storage room since the old computers were removed. [7] Because the Corwin tools went out 310 times and the shelf would cost Ashby nothing to set up, I believe the plan is a sensible use of one corner of the lobby. [8] In other words, each of Corwin's forty tools went out about twenty times in those six months.
[9] Within a few years, the tool shelf might bring in so many new visitors that the library would need to hire another librarian. [10] Most families in Ashby own fewer than five tools of their own. [11] The library first opened in 1958 in a former train depot on Canal Avenue. [12] I hope the library board will vote on the tool shelf at its March meeting, and I would gladly help to sort and label the tools.
Ari labels sentence 7 in the matrix. Is it a fact, a reasoned judgment or speculation, and why?
- Speculation: it guesses how the lobby will look someday, and no figure backs it.
- Reasoned judgment: it is an opinion, and sentences 4 and 6 give the reasons for it.
- Reasoned judgment: it is an opinion, and sentences 9 and 10 give the reasons for it.
- Fact: the count of 310 checkouts in it could be checked in Corwin's records.
Bo checks the letter against its own figures. Which sentence do those figures show is false?
- Sentence 7: other readers might not agree that the plan is a sensible use.
- Sentence 8: 310 checkouts over forty tools comes to about eight each, not twenty.
- Sentence 10: the letter gives no count of the tools that Ashby families own.
- Sentence 5: a free drill sounds too good next to a ninety-dollar one.
Esme checks sentence 5 against the two-part claim in sentence 2: a tool shelf would save families money, and it would be used often enough. Is sentence 5 relevant, and which part does it cover?
- Relevant, but it covers how often the shelf would be used and not the money part.
- Not relevant: it is about a hardware store's prices, not about the library.
- Relevant, and it covers both parts: the money saved and how often tools go out.
- Relevant, but it covers the money part and not how often the shelf would be used.
A Food-Scrap Pickup for Corwin (opinion column)
[1] Every Tuesday, Corwin's municipal trucks haul about 40 tons of household trash to the county landfill, and a considerable share of that load is food that could have been turned into rich garden soil. [2] The town should start a weekly food-scrap pickup, because it would shrink the amount of trash we send away and would cost each household less than a dollar a week.
[3] Two years ago the town of Delmar began such a pickup, and its public works office reports that its weekly trash load fell from 30 tons to 24 tons. [4] That is a decrease of one fifth, and Delmar's collected scraps now become compost that the town distributes to local gardeners each spring. [5] Delmar charges each household $36 a year for the service, which works out to about 69 cents a week. [6] A county study completed last year found that food scraps make up about a quarter of everything Corwin households throw away.
[7] Most Corwin families would gladly separate their scraps into a special bin if the town council asked them to participate. [8] Since Delmar cut its trash by a fifth for less than a dollar a week, I think a pickup would be a fair bargain for Corwin. [9] Put simply, Delmar's pickup has cut its trash by more than a third at a very small price. [10] Within a few years, a pickup like this might even let Corwin close the old transfer station on Station Road. [11] Corwin's trash trucks were painted bright green when the town purchased them from a regional dealer in 2018. [12] I urge the town council to try a food-scrap pickup for one full year and to publish the results, so that residents can judge the experiment for themselves.
Jun labels sentence 10 in the matrix. Is it a fact, a reasoned judgment or speculation, and why?
- Speculation: it guesses at a future change, and sentence 6 shows the guess is wrong.
- Fact: the transfer station on Station Road is a real place a reader could check.
- Reasoned judgment: it is the writer's opinion, and sentence 3 gives the reason for it.
- Speculation: it guesses at a future change, and no figure in the column backs it.
Kira checks the column against its own figures. Which sentence do those figures show is false?
- Sentence 8: calling the pickup a fair bargain is the writer's own view.
- Sentence 9: 30 tons falling to 24 is a drop of one fifth, not more than a third.
- Sentence 7: the column gives no survey of whether families would sort their scraps.
- Sentence 5: $36 a year seems too little to pay for a weekly truck.
Luz checks sentence 11 against the two-part claim in sentence 2: a pickup would shrink the town's trash and cost each household less than a dollar a week. Is sentence 11 relevant, and which part does it cover?
- Not relevant: the trucks' color says nothing about trash amounts or cost.
- Relevant, and it covers both parts, since trucks carry the trash and cost money.
- Relevant, and it covers the trash part, since it is about the town's trash trucks.
- Not relevant: the trucks were bought years before anyone suggested the pickup.
A Longer Walk Signal on Harbor Street (letter to the editor)
[1] The crosswalk at Harbor Street and Fourth Avenue lies between the Delmar Senior Center and the post office, and hundreds of people use it every day. [2] I ask the town to lengthen its walk signal there from 15 seconds to 25, because the present signal is too short for many walkers, and a longer one would barely slow the cars.
[3] Harbor Street is 60 feet wide at that corner, according to the town's own street map. [4] A national guide for traffic engineers assumes that a typical walker covers about 3.5 feet per second and that slower walkers cover about 3 feet. [5] At 3 feet per second, a walker needs 20 seconds to cross 60 feet, which is longer than the 15 seconds the signal now allows. [6] Last month I stood at the corner for one hour and counted 41 people who were still in the street when the signal changed. [7] The town's traffic office says the signal now gives cars on Harbor Street 45 seconds of green light in each cycle.
[8] Even with ten seconds taken from the cars, Harbor Street would keep more than forty seconds of green light. [9] Drivers on Harbor Street are rarely in a hurry at that time of day. [10] Because a slower walker needs 20 seconds and gets only 15, I judge that the present signal is unfair to the people it is meant to protect. [11] A longer signal might even persuade more people to walk to the post office instead of driving. [12] I hope the traffic office will change the signal before winter brings ice to the corner.
Milo labels sentence 7 in the matrix. Is it a fact, a reasoned judgment or speculation, and why?
- Fact: the writer timed it while standing at the corner for one hour.
- Reasoned judgment: it is the traffic office's view of how long cars need.
- Speculation: it predicts how much green light cars will keep after the change.
- Fact: the traffic office's timing records for the signal could check it.
Pia checks sentence 6 against the two-part claim in sentence 2: the signal is too short for many walkers, and a longer one would barely slow the cars. Is sentence 6 relevant, and which part does it cover?
- Relevant, and it covers both parts: walkers caught short and cars barely slowed.
- Not relevant: it is one person's count, not a figure from the traffic office.
- Relevant, but it covers the part about the cars and not the too-short part.
- Relevant, but it covers the too-short part and not the part about the cars.
A Dog Park for Fenwick (opinion column)
[1] Fenwick has about 3,000 licensed dogs, according to the town clerk's official records, but not one public place where a dog may legally run off its leash. [2] The town should fence two acres of Pell Field as a dog park, because owners need a legal place for off-leash play, and the cost would fit inside this year's parks budget.
[3] The parks department estimates that a fence, two gates and a drinking fountain would cost $48,000 in all, including installation. [4] This year's parks budget has $60,000 set aside for new projects, and none of that money has been spent yet. [5] Last year, the town's animal control office issued 212 tickets to owners whose dogs were discovered off their leashes in public parks. [6] The north end of Pell Field has not been used for organized games since the town constructed new ball fields on Garnet Road in 2017.
[7] A dog park might soon become the most popular destination in Fenwick, attracting visitors from neighboring communities on weekends. [8] Since the fence would cost $48,000 and the budget holds $60,000, I think the town can afford the dog park this year without cutting anything else. [9] With 212 tickets a year, animal control writes more than one off-leash ticket every day. [10] Most dog owners in Fenwick would visit the park at least once a week. [11] Pell Field is named for Edwin Pell, a dairy farmer who donated the land to the town in 1931 on the condition that it remain open to the public. [12] Please ask the council to approve the fence at its next meeting, before the spring planting season fills the parks crew's calendar.
Ren labels sentence 8 in the matrix. Is it a fact, a reasoned judgment or speculation, and why?
- Reasoned judgment: it is an opinion, and sentence 5 gives the reason for it.
- Speculation: it guesses about a future budget, and no figure backs it.
- Fact: the two dollar amounts in it can be checked in the parks budget.
- Reasoned judgment: it is an opinion, and sentences 3 and 4 give the reasons for it.
Zee checks sentence 11 against the two-part claim in sentence 2: owners need a legal place for off-leash play, and the cost would fit this year's budget. Is sentence 11 relevant, and which part does it cover?
- Relevant, and it covers both parts, since the dog park would stand on that field.
- Relevant, and it covers the need part, since it tells how the town got the field.
- Not relevant: Edwin Pell gave the land too long ago for it to matter.
- Not relevant: the field's name says nothing about need or cost.