Immigration and city growth, 1880–1920
Grade 11 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Cities and foreign-born people (cards A and B). Card A: Table "Urban and rural people, in thousands", columns Census year | Urban | Rural: 1880 | 14,130 | 36,026; 1920 | 54,158 | 51,553. Data: US Census Bureau, Historical Statistics of the US (1975), series A 57-72. Counts are in thousands of people. Card B: Table "People born abroad living in the United States", columns Census year | Foreign-born people | Share of all people (percent): 1900 | 10,341,276 | 13.6; 1910 | 13,515,886 | 14.7; 1920 | 13,920,692 | 13.2. Data: US Census Bureau, Working Paper 29 (1999), Table 12. Shares are the Census Bureau's.
A textbook says immigrants caused the growth of American cities. What do cards A and B let Ari say?
- The claim is wrong, since rural people also grew by about 15.5 million between 1880 and 1920.
- The claim is right, since the foreign-born count rose by 3.6 million while cities were growing.
- Immigrants were part of the story, but the cards cover different years, so no share follows.
- The claim is wrong, since the urban gain of 40 million is far larger than the foreign-born gain.
Use this
A Chicago ward. Card A: "Jane Addams on her Chicago ward". Who made it: Jane Addams. When: 1910. Where: Chicago. For whom: readers of her book. Why: to describe the ward around Hull-House, looking back. Excerpt (Twenty Years at Hull-House, chapter V; Twenty Years at Hull-House, 1910, pp. 98-99): "The streets are inexpressibly dirty, the number of schools inadequate, sanitary legislation [health laws] unenforced, the street lighting bad, the paving miserable and altogether lacking in the alleys and smaller streets, and the stables foul beyond description. Hundreds of houses are unconnected with the street sewer. The older and richer inhabitants seem anxious to move away as rapidly as they can afford it. They make room for newly arrived immigrants who are densely ignorant of civic duties."
Addams writes that older, richer residents move away "as rapidly as they can afford it" and newcomers "make room." What does Bo take that to show?
- The ward's people were turning over, so one snapshot of it cannot show who stayed or why.
- The ward grew in size, since each leaving household was replaced by a larger newcomer household.
- Immigrants were fully settled in the city, since they filled the homes the older residents left.
- Immigrants drove the older residents out by taking their jobs, since newcomers made room for themselves.
Use this
Arrivals from Europe (cards A and B). Card A: "The Immigration Commission on settlers and temporary workers". Who made it: United States Immigration Commission, created in 1907. When: 1911. Where: Washington. For whom: Congress and the public. Why: to describe how the "new" immigration differed from the "old". Excerpt (Abstracts of Reports of the Immigration Commission, vol. 1; Immigration Commission, Abstracts, vol. 1, 1911, p. 24): "The old immigration movement was essentially one of permanent settlers. The new immigration is very largely one of individuals a considerable proportion of whom apparently have no intention of permanently changing their residence, their only purpose in coming to America being to temporarily take advantage of the greater wages paid for industrial labor in this country. This, of course, is not true of all the new immigrants, but the practice is sufficiently common to warrant referring to it as a characteristic of them as a class." Card B: "European arrivals in two years, in brief". Who made it: the Immigration Commission, 1911, with figures as it printed them. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to count arrivals from Europe. Summary in our words, not a quotation: In the fiscal year 1882, 648,186 European immigrants arrived, and 84,973 of them (13.1 percent) came from southern and eastern countries. In the fiscal year 1907, 1,207,619 arrived from Europe, and 979,661 of them (81 percent) came from southern and eastern countries. The Commission's list of southern and eastern countries includes Austria-Hungary, Italy, Russia and Turkey in Asia. Counts from the Immigration Commission's report of 1911.
Southern and eastern share of arrivals rose from 13.1 to 81 percent, 1882 to 1907. What is true about the counts, Jun asks?
- Their arrivals rose about 6 times, found by dividing 81 percent by 13.1 percent.
- Their arrivals rose about 11.5 times while other European arrivals fell by about 60 percent.
- Other European arrivals fell by about 68 percent, found by subtracting 13.1 from 81.
- Other European arrivals stayed about the same, since the total nearly doubled over the span.
Card A says many new immigrants "apparently" meant to stay briefly. What would let Kira test that claim?
- The share of arrivals from southern and eastern countries in 1907, since 81 percent is large.
- Counts of people leaving, by country, set against arrivals from the same countries.
- Wage rates in industrial jobs, since the Commission says wages drew them.
- More quotations from the Commission's report, since repeated claims show a pattern.
Use this
Foreign-born people from two parts of Europe. Card A: Table "Foreign-born people from two parts of Europe", columns Census year | Northern and western Europe | Southern and eastern Europe: 1880 | 5,499,889 | 248,620; 1900 | 7,204,649 | 1,674,648; 1910 | 7,306,325 | 4,500,932; 1920 | 6,241,916 | 5,670,927. Data: US Census Bureau, Working Paper 29 (1999), Table 4.
A note says: "By 1920 southern and eastern Europe had passed northern and western Europe in foreign-born residents." Check it, Luz.
- False: 5,670,927 is still below 6,241,916, though the gap shrank to under 0.6 million.
- False, since the gap in 1880 was 248,620, the southern and eastern count.
- False, since northern and western was ahead at each census and its count did not drop.
- True, since southern and eastern grew at each census and northern and western fell after 1910.
Use this
The 1924 act and the foreign-born (cards A to D). Card A: "The Immigration Act of 1924, in brief". Who made it: us, from the State Department's Office of the Historian. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: Congress set yearly quotas of two percent of the number of people of each nationality counted in the United States census of 1890. The earlier plan, for a three percent quota, used the census of 1910. The act also excluded any alien "ineligible for citizenship" by race or nationality, which barred Japanese immigrants; Japan protested that this broke the Gentlemen's Agreement. Card B: Table "Foreign-born people from two parts of Europe", columns Census year | Northern and western Europe | Southern and eastern Europe: 1880 | 5,499,889 | 248,620; 1900 | 7,204,649 | 1,674,648; 1910 | 7,306,325 | 4,500,932; 1920 | 6,241,916 | 5,670,927. Data: US Census Bureau, Working Paper 29 (1999), Table 4. Card C: Compare chart "Four answers to immigration, 1882 to 1917", columns Problem | Who pushed for change | Law or result | Date: Anti-Chinese feeling and job competition in the West | Advocates of exclusion in the western states | Chinese Exclusion Act suspends the coming of Chinese laborers for ten years | 1882; Anti-Japanese feeling in California | President Theodore Roosevelt and Japan's government | Gentlemen's Agreement: Japan limits laborers coming to the United States, and San Francisco desegregates its public schools | 1907; Widespread worry about the new immigration | Congress | Immigration Commission studies immigrants and publishes its reports | 1907 to 1911; Support in Congress for further limits on immigration | Congress, over President Wilson's veto | Immigration Act of 1917 adds a literacy test | 1917. Our summary of the sources named on the sheet. Card D: Made-up case, not from any source: Ardonia is a made-up country. The census of 1890 counted 120,000 people of Ardonian nationality in the United States, and the census of 1910 counted 400,000.
Milo checks the cards. Table B counts foreign-born people. Why would an 1890 base instead of 1910 shrink the quotas for southern and eastern countries?
- Two percent is smaller than three percent, so each country's quota fell by the same share.
- The 1890 census counted these nationalities less carefully, which gave their countries lower totals.
- Their count in 1880 and 1900 was far below the 1910 count of 4,500,932, so an 1890 base is smaller.
- The law sets quotas by country of birth in 1920, which shrinks the counts of eastern countries.
The 1924 rule gives made-up Ardonia 2,400 a year; a 1910 base at the same percent would give 8,000. A student calls the 1890 base neutral. What does Noah say?
- The base favors Ardonia, since fewer Ardonians in 1890 meant fewer rivals for the same places each year.
- The percent is the same, but the base year decides the quota: 2,400 instead of 8,000, a 70 percent cut.
- The cut is 5,600 people, so about 70 percent of Ardonia's 1910 residents lost entry.
- The base is neutral, since two percent of any year's count treats each country by one rule.
Card A says the 1924 act barred people "ineligible for citizenship," and card C shows a 1907 Japan agreement. What do the two show Pia?
- Congress followed the agreement, since both treated Japanese laborers in the same way.
- The agreement was repealed by the act, since the act's words name it directly.
- A move from limits negotiated with Japan to exclusion by Congress, which Japan protested.
- Japan accepted the change, since the Gentlemen's Agreement already limited its laborers.
Which revision of the student's note on card B fits the chart on card A, Ren?
- "The 1901 act put city housing under one new department the same year."
- "The 1901 act set rules for new tenements, such as a window for each room."
- "The 1901 act tore down the poorest tenements and left the rest standing."
- "The 1901 act moved toilets inside buildings, and the 1902 act built new tenements."
Use this
Reform in two cities (cards A to C). Card A: "Jane Addams on what a settlement is". Who made it: Jane Addams. When: 1910. Where: Chicago. For whom: readers of her book. Why: to explain what a settlement is, looking back on Hull-House. Excerpt (Twenty Years at Hull-House, chapter VI; Twenty Years at Hull-House, 1910, pp. 125-126): "The Settlement, then, is an experimental effort to aid in the solution of the social and industrial problems which are engendered by the modern conditions of life in a great city. It insists that these problems are not confined to any one portion of a city. It is an attempt to relieve, at the same time, the overaccumulation [too much wealth] at one end of society and the destitution [extreme poverty] at the other; but it assumes that this overaccumulation and destitution is most sorely felt in the things that pertain to social and educational advantages." Card B: "Jane Addams on her Chicago ward". Who made it: Jane Addams. When: 1910. Where: Chicago. For whom: readers of her book. Why: to describe the ward around Hull-House, looking back. Excerpt (Twenty Years at Hull-House, chapter V; Twenty Years at Hull-House, 1910, pp. 98-99): "The streets are inexpressibly dirty, the number of schools inadequate, sanitary legislation [health laws] unenforced, the street lighting bad, the paving miserable and altogether lacking in the alleys and smaller streets, and the stables foul beyond description. Hundreds of houses are unconnected with the street sewer. The older and richer inhabitants seem anxious to move away as rapidly as they can afford it. They make room for newly arrived immigrants who are densely ignorant of civic duties." Card C: "Robert W. de Forest on how the new law worked". Who made it: Robert W. de Forest, chairman of the 1900 state commission. When: 1903. Where: New York. For whom: readers of the book. Why: to report on how the 1901 law had worked. Excerpt (The Tenement House Problem, Introduction; The Tenement House Problem, vol. 1, 1903, p. xvi): "The new-law houses have been an unqualified success. Builders and owners who were at first bitterly opposed to the law are now outspoken in its approval, and many of them state that the new houses are more remunerative [profitable] than the old ones." A student's note, made up and not from any source: "By 1903 reformers had solved the problems of American cities."
Which revision of the student's note fits cards A to C, Zee?
- "Reformers had solved Chicago's problems by 1910, since Addams writes in 1910 about her ward."
- "Addams and de Forest agree reform failed, since both describe how much remained to be done in the city."
- "A New York law improved new tenements, and Addams describes one ward's problems; no card shows cities solved."
- "Reformers solved New York's housing problem, but Addams shows Chicago had not started on reform."