Populists and Progressives: what reformers changed

Grade 11 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.

1. Read this first

   What reformers changed, from railroads to the right to vote

   Columns Problem | Who pushed for change | Law or result | Date. Row 1: Railroad rates across state lines | Farmers and shippers, after years of public demand | Interstate Commerce Act and the Interstate Commerce Commission | February 4, 1887. Row 2: Trusts that controlled whole industries | Reformers in Congress, with Senator John Sherman | Sherman Antitrust Act | July 2, 1890. Row 3: Standard Oil's secret railroad rebates | Ida Tarbell's series in McClure's Magazine | The Supreme Court ordered the Standard Oil Trust broken up | 1911. Row 4: Drinking blamed for harm to families | Temperance groups, including the Anti-Saloon League | The 18th Amendment, enforced by the Volstead Act of October 28, 1919 | January 16, 1919. Row 5: Women denied the vote on account of sex | The woman suffrage movement | The 19th Amendment | August 18, 1920. Data: National Archives, Yale energy history project, Allegheny College, US House of Representatives history pages. The date for the Standard Oil row is the year of the Court's order. Source card "Tarbell on what the oil men asked, 1904". Who made it: Ida M. Tarbell, journalist. When: 1904. Where: New York. For whom: readers of her book and of McClure's Magazine. Why: to tell how the Standard Oil Trust grew. Excerpt (Tarbell, History of the Standard Oil Company, vol. 1, chapter 3; p. 88; checked word for word against three printed editions): "Time and experience would regulate it. Give the refiners open and regular freights, with no favours to any one, and the stronger and better equipped would live, … but give all a chance." Source card "Ida Tarbell and Standard Oil, in brief". Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: Ida Tarbell's 19-part investigation of the Standard Oil Company ran in McClure's Magazine from November 1902 to October 1904, and the book came out in 1904. A federal report in 1906 also blamed Standard Oil's dominance on secret rebate agreements with railroads. In 1911 the Supreme Court ordered the Standard Oil Trust dissolved, and it was broken into about three dozen companies.

2. 1.

   Jun puts Tarbell's passage beside the card on the 1906 federal report. What do the two sources agree on?

   • Both show Standard Oil asked the railroads for rebates, and refiners agreed to them
   • Both show the Supreme Court broke up Standard Oil in 1911 because of rebates
   • Both treat unequal railroad freight rates, such as rebates, as central to the dispute
   • Both confirm Tarbell's whole account, so a historian needs no other source on the matter

3. The Food and Drugs Act, 1906

   Who made it: Congress, in a federal law. When: June 30, 1906. Where: Washington. For whom: the nation. Why: to bar impure and falsely labeled foods and drugs from trade between the states. Excerpt (The Food and Drugs Act, June 30, 1906, section 2; 34 Stat. 768, section 2; checked word for word against three printed editions): "That the introduction into any State or Territory … from any other State or Territory … or from any foreign country, or shipment to any foreign country of any article of food or drugs which is adulterated or misbranded, within the meaning of this Act, is hereby prohibited; …" Source card "The Jungle on speeding up, 1906". Who made it: Upton Sinclair, novelist. When: 1906. Where: New York. For whom: general readers. Why: to tell a made-up story of immigrant workers in a Chicago meatpacking district. Excerpt (Upton Sinclair, The Jungle, chapter 5; p. 67; checked word for word against three printed editions): "Jurgis saw how they managed it; there were portions of the work which determined the pace of the rest, and for these they had picked men whom they paid high wages, and whom they changed frequently. You might easily pick out these pace-makers, for they worked under the eye of the bosses, and they worked like men possessed. This was called "speeding up the gang," and if any man could not keep up with the pace, there were hundreds outside begging to try."

4. 2.

   Pia sets the Food and Drugs Act beside the passage from The Jungle on speeding up. What can Pia conclude?

   • They agree on the cause of unsafe goods, which both trace to speeding up the work
   • They treat different matters: the Act covers impure goods, the passage covers pressure on workers
   • The passage supports the Act, since a packing house that pushes workers sells impure goods
   • The Act confirms the passage, since both date from 1906 and both name the packing houses

5. What reformers changed, from Oregon to the Constitution

   Columns Problem | Who pushed for change | Law or result | Date. Row 1: Laws hard for citizens to propose or check | Direct Legislation League and Oregon voters | Initiative and referendum added to Oregon's constitution | 1902. Row 2: Party leaders choosing candidates | Direct Legislation League and Oregon voters | Direct primary law in Oregon | 1904. Row 3: Officials hard to remove between elections | Direct Legislation League and Oregon voters | Recall added to Oregon's constitution | 1908. Row 4: No federal income tax after the Court struck one down | Farm groups, the People's Party and progressives in Congress | The 16th Amendment | February 3, 1913. Row 5: Senators chosen by state legislatures | Oregon System states and reformers in Congress | The 17th Amendment | April 8, 1913. Data: Oregon Secretary of State Blue Book, National Archives, US Senate Historical Office. Source card "The People's Party on income, 1892". Who made it: the People's Party, in its first national convention. When: July 1892. Where: Omaha, Nebraska. For whom: the voters of the country. Why: to state one of the party's demands. Excerpt (The People's Party platform, Omaha, July 1892, Finance; p. 169; checked word for word against two printed editions): "We demand a graduated income tax." Source card "The 16th Amendment". Who made it: Congress, then the states. When: ratified February 3, 1913. Where: Washington. For whom: the nation. Why: to change the Constitution. Excerpt (The 16th Amendment to the Constitution; Article XVI; checked word for word against three printed editions): "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." Source card "A resolution on electing senators, 1892". Who made it: the People's Party, in its first national convention. When: July 1892. Where: Omaha, Nebraska. For whom: the voters of the country. Why: to say what the delegates favored, apart from the platform. Excerpt (The People's Party platform, Omaha, July 1892, supplementary resolutions; p. 82; checked word for word against two printed editions): "Resolved, That we favor a Constitutional provision limiting the office of President and Vice-President to one term, and providing for the election of … Senators … by a direct vote of the people."

6. 3.

   Milo hears a classmate say no idea in the Omaha platform ever reached the Constitution. Which evidence on the cards best answers the claim?

   • The convention's resolution on electing senators, then the 17th Amendment
   • The plank on railroads, then the Interstate Commerce Act, which put them under a commission
   • Weaver's 22 electoral votes, which show that voters accepted the platform's program
   • The platform's income-tax demand, then the 16th Amendment letting Congress tax incomes

7. Tarbell's preface, 1904

   Who made it: Ida M. Tarbell, journalist. When: 1904. Where: New York. For whom: readers of her book and of McClure's Magazine. Why: to tell how the Standard Oil Trust grew. Excerpt (Tarbell, History of the Standard Oil Company, vol. 1, Preface; Preface; checked word for word against three printed editions): "In order that their readers might have a clear and succinct notion of the processes by which a particular industry passes from the control of the many to that of the few, they decided a few years ago to publish a detailed narrative of the history of the growth of a particular trust. The Standard Oil Trust was chosen for obvious reasons. It was the first in the field, and it has furnished the methods, the charter, and the traditions for its followers." Source card "Ida Tarbell and Standard Oil, in brief". Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: Ida Tarbell's 19-part investigation of the Standard Oil Company ran in McClure's Magazine from November 1902 to October 1904, and the book came out in 1904. A federal report in 1906 also blamed Standard Oil's dominance on secret rebate agreements with railroads. In 1911 the Supreme Court ordered the Standard Oil Trust dissolved, and it was broken into about three dozen companies.

8. 4.

   Zee reads Tarbell's preface beside the card on the 1906 report. Which statement about her purpose do the two best support?

   • She wrote to defend competition, since she says the Trust was the first and fairest in its field
   • She wrote to build a case for the suit the government filed, since the report and the suit followed
   • She chose it because the 1906 report had shown it was the largest company in the country
   • She meant one trust's story to show how an industry passes from many hands to few

9. The 19th Amendment

   Who made it: Congress, then the states. When: ratified August 18, 1920. Where: Washington. For whom: the nation. Why: to change the Constitution. Excerpt (The 19th Amendment to the Constitution; Article XIX; checked word for word against two printed editions): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." Source card "What the 19th Amendment left unsettled, in brief". Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: The National Archives says ratification of the 19th Amendment did not ensure full enfranchisement. Discriminatory state voting laws kept many African American women and other minority women from voting long into the twentieth century.

10. 5.

    A state in 1925 gives men and women the same literacy test. Kira reads the 19th Amendment and the card. Is the test barred by the amendment's text?

    • Yes: the amendment ended state voting tests in 1920, since Congress could enforce it
    • Yes: the text bars any rule that keeps citizens from voting, which includes a literacy test
    • Not by its text, which bars denial on account of sex; the test applies to both sexes
    • No: the amendment settled voting for women, so no woman was kept from the polls afterward

11. What reformers changed, from the farm to the ballot box

    Columns Problem | Who pushed for change | Law or result | Date. Row 1: Railroad rates farmers paid | National Grange, with state legislatures | Granger laws, upheld in Munn v. Illinois (1877) | 1870s. Row 2: Falling crop prices and costly credit | Farmers' Alliances, then the People's Party | The Omaha Platform | July 4, 1892. Row 3: Impure food and drugs | Muckraking writers and President Roosevelt | Pure Food and Drug Act and Meat Inspection Act | June 30, 1906. Row 4: Public voting with party tickets | Reformers in cities and states | The Australian (secret) ballot | 1889 to 1900. Data: Minnesota Historical Society, National Archives, Texas State Historical Association, FSIS and House of Representatives history pages, UVA First Vote project. Source card "The Interstate Commerce Act, in brief". Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: The Interstate Commerce Act of February 4, 1887, put railroads under federal rules, the first industry treated this way. It created the Interstate Commerce Commission, a board of five members. Railroads had given rebates to large shippers and charged farmers more, because farmers did not ship enough to get a better rate. In the Wabash case of 1886 the Court overturned an Illinois law about long-and-short haul rates, ruling that rules for trade between the states belong to Congress alone. Source card "The Grange, in brief". Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: On December 4, 1867, Oliver Hudson Kelley and six co-workers from the federal Bureau of Agriculture started the Grange, formally the Order of Patrons of Husbandry. It was both a social group for farm families and a group that argued for change. Kelley's articles criticized railroads for high freight rates and monopolies for fixing prices unfairly. By the end of 1873 the Grange had about 9,000 chapters and almost 700,000 members across the country. In the 1870s state legislatures in the West and South controlled by Grangers acted against railroad monopolies, and the Supreme Court upheld state controls in Munn v. Illinois (1877).

12. 6.

    Ren reads the cards on the Grange and the Act of 1887. Which statement about the Wabash case is best supported?

    • Wabash followed Munn v. Illinois, so the Court first allowed state rules and then reversed itself
    • Wabash upheld the Illinois law, and Congress then copied the Illinois approach nationally in 1887
    • Wabash left rules for trade between states to Congress, which created a commission in 1887
    • Wabash alone explains the Act, so protests by farmers and shippers played little part

13. The 18th Amendment, in brief

    Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: Congress passed the 18th Amendment on December 18, 1917, and the states ratified it on January 16, 1919, about 13 months later. Prohibition took effect one year after ratification. The amendment banned making, selling and moving intoxicating liquors, but it did not define the term or say how to enforce the ban. Congress passed the Volstead Act on October 28, 1919, over President Wilson's veto, to supply the details. The 21st Amendment repealed the 18th when it was ratified on December 5, 1933.

14. 7.

    The Volstead Act (October 1919) came before the ban took effect. Luz reads the card. What explains that order?

    • The Act was passed over Wilson's veto, so the ban had to wait until the veto was overridden
    • The 21st Amendment, ratified in 1933, delayed the ban until the Act was passed
    • The ban began on ratification in 1919, and the Act then filled gaps that appeared in enforcement
    • The ban began a year after ratification, so Congress passed the details in 1919 first

15. Arizona and the recall of judges, 1911 to 1912

    Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: Arizona's draft state constitution let voters recall judges. On August 15, 1911, President Taft vetoed the resolution admitting Arizona and New Mexico because he objected to that provision. Congress then passed another resolution, which Taft approved on August 21, 1911, admitting both territories on the condition that Arizona voters adopt an amendment removing the judicial recall provision. The voters of the territory did so in December 1911. New Mexico became the 47th state on January 6, 1912, and Arizona the 48th on February 14, 1912. After admission, Arizona voters reinstated the provision.

16. 8.

    Tala reads the card on Arizona's statehood. Which statement about the recall of judges is best supported?

    • Congress admitted Arizona in August 1911 once its voters had removed the recall of judges
    • Arizona's voters refused the condition, but Congress admitted the state in February 1912
    • Arizona's voters dropped it in December 1911 to be admitted, then restored it afterward
    • Taft's veto of August 1911 ended any recall of judges in Arizona from then on

17. The election of 1892

    Columns: Candidate; Party; Electoral votes; Popular votes. Grover Cleveland: Democratic: 277: 5,554,617. Benjamin Harrison: Republican: 145: 5,186,793. James B. Weaver: People's: 22: 1,029,357. Data: National Archives, 1892 Electoral College results (444 electoral votes in all, 223 needed to win); American Presidency Project, University of California, Santa Barbara, popular votes Source card "How electoral votes were won in 1892". Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: In most states in 1892 the candidate who came first in the state won all of that state's electoral votes. A candidate who came second in a state won none of them.

18. 9.

    Weaver won about 9 percent of the three-way vote but about 5 percent of the electoral votes. Esme reads both cards. What explains the gap?

    • Electors were divided by each candidate's share of a state's votes, but Weaver's share was small
    • Third parties were barred from winning electors in states with fusion tickets, which cut his total
    • The popular vote totals for third parties were less reliable in 1892, so the gap is partly a counting error
    • In most states only the first-place candidate won electors, so votes spread thinly earned few

19. Why the 17th Amendment passed, in brief

    Who made it: historians and textbooks writing today. When: today. Where: the United States. For whom: readers today. Why: to sum up what is known. Summary in our words, not a quotation: Before 1913 state legislatures chose senators. In some states the legislatures deadlocked and left Senate seats empty for months or years, and in some places powerful interests or party machines dominated the legislature. Oregon developed a method in which a state primary showed the voters' choice and candidates for the legislature promised to honor it. In 1910 and 1911 the House passed versions of the amendment with a race rider meant to bar federal action against racial discrimination among voters. Supporters said the rider protected state sovereignty; opponents said it was a way around the 15th Amendment's protection of Black voters. Senator Joseph L. Bristow of Kansas offered a version without the rider. When Connecticut approved on April 8, 1913, three-fourths of the states had ratified the amendment. The next year, 1914, was the first time all Senate elections were held by popular vote. Data card "Choosing senators before 1913". Columns: What was counted; Count. Deadlocks in state legislatures, 1891 to 1905: 45 deadlocks in 20 states. Bribery cases brought before the Senate, 1866 to 1906: 9. States electing senators by party primary or general election, by 1912: as many as 29. Data: US Senate Historical Office, the Seventeenth Amendment. Arizona became the 48th state on February 14, 1912.

20. 10.

    Noah reads the cards. Why can Noah not say 29 states already had their voters choose senators before 1913?

    • The 29 states are the ones that had already ratified the 17th Amendment by the end of 1912
    • Legislatures still made the formal choice; Oregon candidates merely promised to honor the primary
    • The count covers general elections, so it leaves out the states that held primaries instead
    • The count was taken in 1905, so it cannot describe what the states were doing by 1912