Kinds of work and how geographers measure development
Grade 9 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Card D. Income per person and World Bank income groups, 2025. Country | GNI per person (US$) | Income group: Niger | 750 | low income; Nigeria | 1,360 | lower-middle income; India | 2,760 | lower-middle income; Mexico | 13,730 | upper-middle income; China | 14,230 | upper-middle income; United States | 88,810 | high income. Note: GNI per person is the income earned by a country's residents in a year, divided by its population (World Bank Atlas method, 2025). The World Bank's groups for its 2027 fiscal year: low income, $1,175 or less; lower-middle, $1,176 to $4,635; upper-middle, $4,636 to $14,375; high, more than $14,375.
Jun imagines every country's GNI per person on Card D rising 4% while the group lines stay put. Which countries change income group?
- China and the United States, because both would end above the $14,375 line once the 4% rise is added
- China and Mexico, because Mexico's $13,730 is within 5% of the high-income line and the 4% rise would lift it over
- No country, because a 4% rise is small beside the gaps between the lines that separate the income groups
- Only China, which passes the $14,375 line at about $14,799, while Mexico reaches only about $14,279
Pia compares Niger, Nigeria and India on Card D. Which statement about their income groups is supported?
- Niger and Nigeria are both low income, because their figures are both below $1,400 and are close together
- Nigeria and India share a group though India's figure is over twice Nigeria's, and Niger is below the $1,175 line
- India's group is about twice as high as Nigeria's, because India's income per person is about twice as large
- Nigeria belongs with Niger rather than India, because it is $610 above Niger but $1,400 below India
Use this
Card D. Income per person and World Bank income groups, 2025. Country | GNI per person (US$) | Income group: Niger | 750 | low income; Nigeria | 1,360 | lower-middle income; India | 2,760 | lower-middle income; Mexico | 13,730 | upper-middle income; China | 14,230 | upper-middle income; United States | 88,810 | high income. Note: GNI per person is the income earned by a country's residents in a year, divided by its population (World Bank Atlas method, 2025). The World Bank's groups for its 2027 fiscal year: low income, $1,175 or less; lower-middle, $1,176 to $4,635; upper-middle, $4,636 to $14,375; high, more than $14,375. Card E (made up for practice). Two countries in 2025. Marden: GNI per person $3,900; workers: farming 48%, industry 22%, services 30%. Pellan: GNI per person $3,900; workers: farming 12%, industry 18%, services 70%.
Bo notes that Marden and Pellan on Card E have the same income per person and fall in the same Card D group. What does Card E add?
- Pellan's workers must earn more than Marden's, because services pay more than farming does in a typical country
- Card D's groups cannot be right here, because countries with equal incomes should also have an equal mix of jobs
- The same income group can hide different jobs: most Marden workers farm and most Pellan workers are in services
- Pellan must rank higher in development, because services employ most of its workers and farming employs most of Marden's
Milo asks where Marden belongs on Card D, and what Card E and Card D together say about Marden and India. What is sound?
- Marden is low income like Niger, because nearly half of its workers farm, which is what Niger's workers mostly do too
- Marden sits in India's lower-middle group; Card D has no job shares for India, so their jobs cannot be compared
- Marden's income is limited by its large farm share, so India's income must be limited by the same cause
- Marden is upper-middle, because the group's lines are meant for countries with fewer than half of workers farming
Use this
Card F (made up for practice). Orlo's GNI per person in current US dollars, not adjusted for price changes: 2005, $1,000; 2015, $2,500; 2025, $6,000. Orlo's prices were 50% higher in 2025 than in 2005, so a basket of goods that cost $100 in 2005 cost $150 in 2025.
Zee reads Card F: income per person rose from $1,000 to $6,000. About how much did buying power per person grow?
- About five and a half times, taking the 50% price rise away from the 500% rise in income to get $5,500
- No growth, because the 50% rise in prices cancels the whole rise from $1,000 to $6,000 in income
- About four times: $6,000 divided by the price rise of 1.5 is about $4,000 in 2005 prices
- Six times, because the card reports the dollars people earned, and $6,000 is six times as many dollars as $1,000
Use this
Card G (made up for practice). Two countries in 2025. Xanta: total GNI $900 billion; population 150 million. Yorvik: total GNI $1,200 billion; population 400 million. Note: GNI per person is total GNI divided by population.
Ren compares Xanta and Yorvik on Card G. Which statement about size and income is right?
- Yorvik has the higher income per person, because its total of $1,200 billion is larger than Xanta's $900 billion
- Yorvik is the more developed country, because its economy is the larger of the two and it has more people
- Xanta's income per person is 50% higher than Yorvik's, because Yorvik's figure is half of Xanta's figure
- Yorvik has the larger total income, but Xanta's people have twice the income per person
Use this
Card G (made up for practice). Two countries in 2025. Xanta: total GNI $900 billion; population 150 million. Yorvik: total GNI $1,200 billion; population 400 million. Note: GNI per person is total GNI divided by population. Card D. Income per person and World Bank income groups, 2025. Country | GNI per person (US$) | Income group: Niger | 750 | low income; Nigeria | 1,360 | lower-middle income; India | 2,760 | lower-middle income; Mexico | 13,730 | upper-middle income; China | 14,230 | upper-middle income; United States | 88,810 | high income. Note: GNI per person is the income earned by a country's residents in a year, divided by its population (World Bank Atlas method, 2025). The World Bank's groups for its 2027 fiscal year: low income, $1,175 or less; lower-middle, $1,176 to $4,635; upper-middle, $4,636 to $14,375; high, more than $14,375.
Esme places Xanta and Yorvik in Card D's groups. Which placement is right?
- Xanta is upper-middle and Yorvik is low income, because Yorvik's income per person is just half of Xanta's
- Yorvik is in the higher group, because groups rank countries by total income and Yorvik's total is the larger
- Both are upper-middle, because both totals ($900 billion and $1,200 billion) are far above the $4,636 line that starts that group
- Xanta is upper-middle and Yorvik lower-middle, because groups use income per person, not total income
Use this
Card H (made up for practice). Three countries in 2005 and 2025. Lorn: farming share of workers 50% then 20%; GNI per person $800 then $4,000. Mesh: farming 52% then 45%; GNI per person $850 then $1,400. Quil: farming 30% then 8%; GNI per person $5,000 then $12,000. Note: in 2008 Lorn began selling copper from a new mine.
Ari tests the idea that a falling farming share raises income per person, using Card H. Which country is the weakest evidence?
- Lorn, because its new copper mine in 2008 could explain its income jump apart from workers leaving farming
- No country is weaker than the others, because the three rows show income rising as farming falls, so each is equally strong
- Quil, because it started the richest in 2005 and so had the least need to change its mix of jobs
- Mesh, because its farming share fell just 7 points, which is too small a change to show anything
Use this
Card H (made up for practice). Three countries in 2005 and 2025. Lorn: farming share of workers 50% then 20%; GNI per person $800 then $4,000. Mesh: farming 52% then 45%; GNI per person $850 then $1,400. Quil: farming 30% then 8%; GNI per person $5,000 then $12,000. Note: in 2008 Lorn began selling copper from a new mine. Card D. Income per person and World Bank income groups, 2025. Country | GNI per person (US$) | Income group: Niger | 750 | low income; Nigeria | 1,360 | lower-middle income; India | 2,760 | lower-middle income; Mexico | 13,730 | upper-middle income; China | 14,230 | upper-middle income; United States | 88,810 | high income. Note: GNI per person is the income earned by a country's residents in a year, divided by its population (World Bank Atlas method, 2025). The World Bank's groups for its 2027 fiscal year: low income, $1,175 or less; lower-middle, $1,176 to $4,635; upper-middle, $4,636 to $14,375; high, more than $14,375.
Luz sorts Lorn's and Quil's 2025 incomes into Card D's groups. Which statement is right?
- Lorn is upper-middle in 2025, because $4,000 is within 15% of the $4,636 line and so counts as that group
- Quil is high income in 2025, because its $12,000 is three times Lorn's $4,000 and so is far above middle
- In 2025 Lorn's $4,000 is lower-middle and Quil's $12,000 is upper-middle on Card D's lines
- Lorn moved up a group since 2005, because its $800 then was under $1,175, and Card D's lines apply to that year too
Use this
Card D. Income per person and World Bank income groups, 2025. Country | GNI per person (US$) | Income group: Niger | 750 | low income; Nigeria | 1,360 | lower-middle income; India | 2,760 | lower-middle income; Mexico | 13,730 | upper-middle income; China | 14,230 | upper-middle income; United States | 88,810 | high income. Note: GNI per person is the income earned by a country's residents in a year, divided by its population (World Bank Atlas method, 2025). The World Bank's groups for its 2027 fiscal year: low income, $1,175 or less; lower-middle, $1,176 to $4,635; upper-middle, $4,636 to $14,375; high, more than $14,375. Card H (made up for practice). Three countries in 2005 and 2025. Lorn: farming share of workers 50% then 20%; GNI per person $800 then $4,000. Mesh: farming 52% then 45%; GNI per person $850 then $1,400. Quil: farming 30% then 8%; GNI per person $5,000 then $12,000. Note: in 2008 Lorn began selling copper from a new mine.
Tala sets Lorn's 2005 income ($800) beside Niger's 2025 income ($750) on Card D. Which statement is fair?
- No comparison is possible, because the countries on Card H are made up and Card D is real data
- Lorn's 2025 income ($4,000), not its 2005 income, is the fair partner for Niger's 2025 figure ($750)
- Niger's farm share is probably near Lorn's 50% of 2005, since both incomes are under $1,000 per person
- Lorn in 2005 ($800) and Niger in 2025 ($750) are almost equal, so Lorn then was as poor as Niger is today