Why people migrate: push and pull factors and their effects
Grade 9 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Card A. International migrants, 2000 to 2020 (UN DESA estimates of people living outside their country of origin): 173 million (2000), 221 million (2010) and 281 million (2020). In 2020 that was about 3.6% of the world's people. Note: a push factor drives people away from a place, such as few jobs or drought. A pull factor draws people to a place, such as jobs or schools. Internal migration is moving within one country.
Ari compares the two decades on Card A: 2000 to 2010 and 2010 to 2020. Which statement is right?
- Both decades added about the same number, roughly 54 million each, so the numbers grew in equal steps
- The second decade also rose faster in percent, because a gain of 60 million is bigger than a gain of 48 million
- The second decade added more migrants (60 million against 48 million), yet both rose about 27%
- The figures count moves made in each decade, so 281 million people moved between 2010 and 2020
Luz says: "281 million people moved abroad in 2020." What does Card A actually count?
- People who plan to return to their home country after a short stay, as a count of temporary moves
- People who moved abroad for jobs, since jobs are the pull factor Card A names first in its note
- People living outside their country of origin in 2020, whenever they moved
- People who moved to another country during the year 2020, counted once at the time of the move
Tala reads Card A's share for 2020: about 3.6% of the world's people. Which sentence reads it correctly?
- About 1 in 28 people lived outside their country of origin in 2020, and most did not
- About 1 in 3 people lived outside their country of origin in 2020, since 3.6% means 36 in 100
- Migration is rare, so it matters little to any country and the figure can be ignored by planners
- About 3.6% of people moved abroad during 2020, so each year adds a similar share of the world
Jun wants the rise in migrants from 2000 to 2020 on Card A as a percent. Which is right?
- About 108%, because the rise is 108 million and a rise in millions equals a rise in percent
- About 62%, because the rise of 108 million is measured against the 2000 figure of 173 million
- About 38%, because the rise of 108 million is measured against the 2020 figure of 281 million
- About 27%, because each decade rose about 27% and the two-decade rise is the same
Use this
Card B (made up for practice). Two towns in one country. Rena: its main factory has closed, 3 in 10 workers have no job, and a drought has dried up the wells. Soto: a new port has opened, wages are 40% higher than in Rena, and the college is taking more students. The road from Rena to Soto takes 2 days and a ticket costs a month's wages in Rena. Note: an intervening obstacle is a cost or barrier that makes a move harder.
Bo meets a family in Rena that still has jobs but has lost its well. Which factor applies to them?
- An environmental pull, because the lost well makes the family want to live near Soto's port
- An economic push, because losing water costs the family money and so is about jobs and earnings
- No factor, because the family has jobs and so no push applies to them
- An environmental push, the drought, though not the economic push from the factory closing
Milo compares a move from Rena to Soto with Card A's 281 million. Does the move belong in that count?
- Yes, because Card A counts the moves made during the year, and the move to Soto is one of them
- Yes, because any family that moves 2 days by road has left its home and so counts as a migrant abroad
- No: both towns are in one country, so the move is internal migration, not counted by Card A
- No, because Card A cannot count migrants, as the estimates are too rough to compare with a town
Zee asks how long a Rena worker needs to earn back the ticket's cost in Soto, doing the same job at 40% higher pay. About how long?
- About 2.5 months: the extra pay is 40% of a month's wage per month, against a one-month ticket
- About 4 months, because 40% of a month's wage is worth about a quarter of the ticket
- About 40 months, because the wage is 40% higher and each month adds 1% of the ticket price
- About 1 month, because the ticket costs a month's wages and Soto pays higher wages
Kira asks which change in Rena would weaken the main economic push the most. Which fits?
- New jobs in Rena, which would remove the main economic push, the 3 in 10 workers without work
- More students at Soto's college, which would reduce the push because fewer young people stay in Rena
- A cheaper ticket, which would remove the push from the drought because people could leave more easily
- Higher wages in Soto, which would weaken the push from Rena by making Soto look more attractive
Use this
Card A. International migrants, 2000 to 2020 (UN DESA estimates of people living outside their country of origin): 173 million (2000), 221 million (2010) and 281 million (2020). In 2020 that was about 3.6% of the world's people. Note: a push factor drives people away from a place, such as few jobs or drought. A pull factor draws people to a place, such as jobs or schools. Internal migration is moving within one country. Card B (made up for practice). Two towns in one country. Rena: its main factory has closed, 3 in 10 workers have no job, and a drought has dried up the wells. Soto: a new port has opened, wages are 40% higher than in Rena, and the college is taking more students. The road from Rena to Soto takes 2 days and a ticket costs a month's wages in Rena. Note: an intervening obstacle is a cost or barrier that makes a move harder.
Ren compares Card A's headline (281 million, 3.6%) with Card B. Which statement fits both cards?
- Card A's count rises each time a family moves anywhere, so Rena to Soto raises it by the family's size
- Card A's count leaves out moves within a country, so a move like Rena to Soto adds nothing to it
- Card A shows that moves within a country are rare, since it counts so few moves compared with the world
- Card A's count includes moves within a country, so a move like Rena to Soto adds one to the total
Use this
Card B (made up for practice). Two towns in one country. Rena: its main factory has closed, 3 in 10 workers have no job, and a drought has dried up the wells. Soto: a new port has opened, wages are 40% higher than in Rena, and the college is taking more students. The road from Rena to Soto takes 2 days and a ticket costs a month's wages in Rena. Note: an intervening obstacle is a cost or barrier that makes a move harder.
Noah lists the intervening obstacle between Rena and Soto on Card B. Which is it?
- The cost of a ticket, a month's wages in Rena, and the 2 days on the road
- Soto's wages, 40% higher than Rena's, because they are a feature of the destination that a family must weigh
- The drought in Rena, because it makes staying harder and so gets in the way of a normal family life
- The factory closing, because it blocks workers from earning and so stands between them and Soto