Where resources are, and renewable vs nonrenewable energy
Grade 9 Social Studies Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Card A, U.S. energy use by source, 2025 (EIA, preliminary): petroleum 37%; natural gas 36%; coal 9%; nuclear (uranium) 9%; renewable sources 9%. Card B, U.S. electricity by source, 2025 (EIA), with one trade-off each: natural gas 41%, burns with fewer emissions than coal or oil, but leaks of it add methane to the air; nuclear 18%, no air pollution while operating, but leaves radioactive waste to store; coal 17%, plentiful and fairly cheap to produce, but mining changes the land; wind 11%, no emissions or cooling water, but blades are noisy and can harm birds and bats; solar 7%, no air pollution while operating, but panels take energy and materials to make; hydropower 6%, no direct air pollutants, but dams can block fish migration. Renewable sources together make about 24% of U.S. electricity; petroleum makes about 0.7%. Card C: people use energy for transportation, heating, factories and electricity, so electricity is one use of energy. EIA calls a source nonrenewable when its supply is limited to what can be mined or extracted and takes a very long time to form; nuclear is listed as nonrenewable. Renewable sources replenish naturally but are limited by how much flows at a time.
Renewable sources are 9% of energy use (Card A) but about 24% of electricity (Card B). What explains the gap, Jun asks?
- The charts disagree about renewable sources, so a mistake lies in one of the two lists of shares
- Electricity is only part of energy use, and renewable sources are a larger share of that part than of the whole
- Renewable sources supply 24% of all U.S. energy, since 24% is the larger and more recent figure here
- The gap shows wind and solar replaced coal in power plants, since coal's share of energy use is only 9%
A planner says switching from coal to natural gas solves the emissions problem. What do the cards support, Luz asks?
- Gas burns with fewer emissions than coal, but leaks add methane, so the gain is real without being complete
- Gas burns with fewer emissions than coal, so switching removes the emissions problem from the plant
- Gas leaks add methane, which cancels the lower emissions, so switching gains nothing in the air
- Gas is a renewable source, so switching from coal to gas gives clean power from a source that renews
Which statement compares wind and hydropower fairly using Card B, Milo asks?
- Neither harms wildlife, since both are renewable sources and renewable sources replenish naturally
- They make about the same electricity, so the wildlife harm decides, and both have the same harm
- Hydropower makes more electricity, 6% against 11%, since a dam can keep running through the day and night
- Wind makes more electricity, 11% against 6%, and each harms a different kind of wildlife
A headline says wind makes nearly half of U.S. renewable electricity. Is that supported by Card B, Noah asks?
- Yes: wind is 11% of electricity and renewables together are about 24%, so wind is about 46% of them
- No: wind is 11% and renewables are 24%, so wind is about a quarter of renewable electricity at most
- No: shares of electricity cannot be divided by one another, so no such headline can be checked
- No: wind is 11%, so it is about a tenth of renewable electricity, which is a much smaller part
Pia's note: 'Nuclear makes no air pollution, so it is a renewable source.' Which fix fits the cards?
- Change nothing, since a source that makes no air pollution must also replenish itself over time
- Nuclear makes no air pollution in operation but is nonrenewable, because its supply is limited to mined uranium
- Change 'nuclear' to 'natural gas', since gas is the source with the fewest emissions on the chart of electricity sources
- Change 'no air pollution' to 'waste', since waste to store is what makes a source nonrenewable
Ren's note: 'Natural gas is 41% of electricity, so it is 41% of all U.S. energy.' Which fix fits Cards A and B?
- Natural gas is 41% of electricity, so it is about 41% of 36% of all energy use, which is 15%
- Natural gas is 41% of electricity but 36% of all energy use, since the two shares have different totals
- Natural gas is 41% of electricity and the same 41% of energy use, since electricity is where gas is burned
- Natural gas is 36% of electricity and 41% of energy use, since the charts list the shares in swapped order
Hydropower counts as renewable, yet Card B lists a cost for dams. Tala asks how both can be true.
- Hydropower is renewable when no dam is built, so a dam makes it nonrenewable by definition
- Renewable sources have no costs, so Card B's note on dams must be an error in the list of trade-offs
- Hydropower is not truly renewable, since a source that has a cost to wildlife cannot be called renewable under the EIA definitions
- Renewable describes a supply that replenishes; it does not mean harmless, and dams can block fish migration
Solar and nuclear both make no air pollution while operating. What separates their trade-offs on Card B, Zee asks?
- Solar's cost is waste to store and nuclear's cost is the energy and materials it takes to make fuel
- Nuclear's cost comes when the plant is made, and solar's comes later, in the panels that must be stored
- They do not differ, since both have no operating pollution and so neither has a cost to weigh
- Solar's cost comes when panels are made, using energy and materials; nuclear's comes later, in waste to store
Natural gas leads electricity (41%) and ranks second in energy use (36%, with petroleum 37%). Which reading is right, Ari asks?
- The two ranks conflict, so a mistake lies in one chart, since gas cannot rank first and second
- Gas leads all energy use as it leads electricity, since the shares of both charts rank the sources the same way
- Gas leads electricity clearly, while petroleum leads energy use by only a point, a small gap
- Petroleum leads energy use by a large margin, since a source that ranks first is far ahead of the rest
Bo's note: 'Wind and solar have no environmental costs.' Which fix fits Card B?
- Change it to 'wind and solar are the most costly sources', since each has a cost listed on the chart
- Keep it, since a source with no emissions has no costs for the land, the animals, the water or the materials it needs
- Wind and solar make no operating emissions, but blades can harm birds and bats and panels need energy and materials
- Change it to 'wind has costs but solar has no cost', since blades are the one thing that harms wildlife on the list