Cell theory and how it was discovered
Grade 9 Science Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Ari combines events A and B. Which part of cell theory do they support together, and why?
- Part 1, because Hooke had already finished it in 1665
- Part 1, because plants and animals were both found to be made of cells
- Part 1, because Schwann alone showed it in 1839 with animal tissue
- Part 3, because both scientists watched cells divide under the microscope
Bo combines events A and B. What do they show together, and why?
Timeline strip from 1850 to 1865, a mark every 5 years. A: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852). B: Pasteur disproves spontaneous generation (the idea that living things arise from nonliving matter) (1862). Timeline strip from 1850 to 1865, a mark every 5 years. A: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852). B: Pasteur disproves spontaneous generation (the idea that living things arise from nonliving matter) (1862). 1850 1855 1860 1865 A B A: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852) B: Pasteur disproves spontaneous generation (the idea that living things arise from nonliving matter) (1862) - Part 2, because both events show the cell is the unit of life
- Part 3, because cells divide and do not form from nonliving matter
- Part 3, because Pasteur's flask work in 1862 came before Remak's evidence
- Part 3, because spontaneous generation was shown in 1862
Esme combines events A and B. What had scientists seen by 1674?
Timeline strip from 1650 to 1700, a mark every 10 years. A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Leeuwenhoek sees single-celled organisms in lake water (1674). Timeline strip from 1650 to 1700, a mark every 10 years. A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Leeuwenhoek sees single-celled organisms in lake water (1674). 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 A B A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665) B: Leeuwenhoek sees single-celled organisms in lake water (1674) - Cells come from cells, shown by the 1674 organisms
- The full cell theory, finished by the two of them together by 1674
- Living cells fill cork tissue, and Hooke watched them move in 1665
- Cork is built of box-like cells, and single cells can live alone
Jun writes: Hooke discovered that all living things are made of cells. What is wrong with this claim?
Timeline strip from 1650 to 1870, a mark every 50 years. A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). C: Schwann says animals are made of cells (1839). Timeline strip from 1650 to 1870, a mark every 50 years. A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). C: Schwann says animals are made of cells (1839). 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 A B C A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). C: Schwann says animals are made of cells (1839). - Hooke worked in 1855, after Virchow's essay, so he could not have said it
- Hooke named cork cells in 1665; plants and animals came in 1838 and 1839
- Nothing is wrong with it, because Hooke saw living cells in his cork slices
- Hooke named cells, but Virchow alone completed the theory
Kira writes: Virchow's essay came before Schleiden's work, so Virchow started cell theory. What is wrong with this claim?
Timeline strip from 1830 to 1860, a mark every 10 years. A: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). B: Virchow publishes an essay saying that cells come from cells (1855). Timeline strip from 1830 to 1860, a mark every 10 years. A: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). B: Virchow publishes an essay saying that cells come from cells (1855). 1830 1840 1850 1860 A B A: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838) B: Virchow publishes an essay saying that cells come from cells (1855) - Schleiden worked alone, so Virchow had no part in the theory
- 1855 is earlier than 1839, so Virchow's essay came before Schwann's work
- 1855 is later than 1838, so Virchow's essay came after Schleiden's work
- Virchow's essay was about plants, not about cells
Luz writes: Cell theory is just a theory, so scientists have not tested it. What is wrong with this claim?
- A theory is a tested and confirmed explanation
- Cell theory is a hypothesis until scientists vote
- A theory is a guess that waits for its first test
- Theories get tested after they become laws
Noah reads that Schleiden thought cells formed like crystals and that Remak later showed cell division. Which statement fits?
Timeline strip from 1830 to 1855, a mark every 5 years. A: Schleiden believes that cells form through crystallization (1838). B: Remak publishes evidence of cell division (1852). Timeline strip from 1830 to 1855, a mark every 5 years. A: Schleiden believes that cells form through crystallization (1838). B: Remak publishes evidence of cell division (1852). 1830 1835 1840 1845 1850 1855 A B A: Schleiden believes that cells form through crystallization (1838) B: Remak publishes evidence of cell division (1852) - Cells arise by division, so Schleiden's idea about crystals was corrected
- Cells form like crystals, so Remak's evidence confirmed Schleiden
- Cells divide, but Remak's 1852 evidence came before Schleiden's 1838 idea
- Cells divide, which Schleiden had already shown alone in 1838
Pia reads that some historians say Remak deserves credit. Which timeline fact supports them?
Timeline strip from 1850 to 1860, a mark every 5 years. A: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852). B: Virchow publishes an essay that makes the idea popular (1855). Timeline strip from 1850 to 1860, a mark every 5 years. A: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852). B: Virchow publishes an essay that makes the idea popular (1855). 1850 1855 1860 A B A: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852) B: Virchow publishes an essay that makes the idea popular (1855) - Virchow credited Remak by name in his 1855 essay
- Remak published his evidence in 1852, three years before Virchow's essay
- Remak published his evidence in 1862, seven years after Virchow's 1855 essay
- Virchow alone gathered the evidence, so Remak had no part
Ren's class imagines a newly found organism made of one swimming cell. Does it fit cell theory, and why?
- Yes, because it formed from nonliving water
- No, because cell theory covers just plants and animals
- No, because a basic unit of life must have many cells
- Yes, because one or more cells make up living things
A museum sign says cell theory was finished in 1665. Zee checks the timeline. Which claim fits best, and why?
Timeline strip from 1650 to 1870, a mark every 50 years. A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). C: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852). D: Virchow publishes an essay saying that cells come from cells (1855). Timeline strip from 1650 to 1870, a mark every 50 years. A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665). B: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838). C: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852). D: Virchow publishes an essay saying that cells come from cells (1855). 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 A B C D A: Hooke names cells in cork (1665) B: Schleiden says plants are made of cells (1838) C: Remak shows that cells come from cells by dividing (1852) D: Virchow publishes an essay saying that cells come from cells (1855) - It was finished in 1665, because Hooke alone named cells
- It was finished by Virchow in 1855, before Remak's work
- It is a guess, because it has an old date and no one has tested it
- It built up over time, with parts added in 1838, 1852 and 1855