Other ways populations change: drift, gene flow and mutation
Grade 9 Science Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
A meadow after a model flood, then after seeds arrive from the source meadow (model data)
group alleles R alleles p for R source meadow 2,000 1,000 0.5 survivors of the flood 40 8 0.2 seeds arriving from the source meadow 60 30 0.5 After a model flood, seedlings from the source meadow join the survivors. Ari recomputes p for R. What is the new p, and what happened to the gap from the source meadow's p?
- 0.50, and the gap to the source meadow closed completely to 0
- 0.38, and the gap to the source meadow shrank from 0.30 to 0.12
- 0.35, the average of 0.2 and 0.5, with the gap shrinking to 0.15
- 0.38, and the gap to the source meadow grew because seedlings add differences
Six runs of a 10-plant population (20 alleles) where R plants survive to breed 70% of the time and W plants 50% (model data)
run R alleles of 20 at generation 8 1 19 2 20 3 11 4 20 5 12 6 11 Bo reads six model runs that began with 10 of 20 alleles being R. Which statement fits the table?
- Drift raised R in all six runs, since all six ended above 10
- Selection failed in runs 3, 5 and 6, since R did not reach 20
- Selection raised R in all six runs, and drift made the end counts differ
- Drift scattered the end counts, and a larger population would scatter them more
A source meadow and two islands, each started by 5 seeds (model data)
place alleles R alleles p for R source meadow 2,000 1,000 0.5 island 1 200 140 0.7 island 2 200 40 0.2 Each island began with 5 seeds from one meadow. Wind later carries seeds between the islands until they form one population. Jun recomputes p for R in it. What is it?
- 0.45: 180 of the 400 alleles are R, closer to the source's 0.5
- 0.90: the sum of the p values of the two islands, 0.7 and 0.2
- 0.18: 180 R alleles shared among the 1,000 alleles of the source meadow
- 0.50: islands founded from one meadow have the same p as that meadow
A meadow before and after a model flood that favored no allele (model data)
when plants alleles R alleles p for R before the flood 1,000 2,000 800 0.40 after the flood 10 20 13 0.65 R and W plants were equally likely to remain after a model flood. Luz sees p for R rise from 0.40 to 0.65. Why did p change?
- The 10 remaining plants were a chance sample, so p can differ from the original
- A sample of 10 plants should match the original p, so the table must have an error
- R mutated more often during the flood, which raised p to 0.65
- R plants were better at surviving the flood, so p rose
Use the table
Allele V in a population of 1,000 plants (2,000 alleles) when each V plant leaves 1.5 times as many surviving young (model data)
generation V alleles of 2,000 0 1 10 56 20 1,249 30 1,979 Mutation made allele V once, in generation 0. Milo sees V grow from 1 copy to 1,979. Mutation is rare, so what explains the growth?
- Drift pushed V upward each generation until V was common
- Mutation made new V alleles in many plants each generation, so the share of V kept growing
- V plants left more surviving young, so selection raised V after the one mutation
- Gene flow brought V in from other populations over time
Notebook
Notes on a model flood (classmate's notebook), 4 lines. Columns: line, entry. Line 1: A meadow of 1,000 plants held alleles R, W and Y; a model flood left 8 plants. Line 2: The flood favored no allele, so the 8 plants were a chance sample. Line 3: So the 8 plants must still hold all three alleles in the same shares. Line 4: Regrowth adds plants but not the alleles the 8 plants did not carry.
Ren reads a classmate's notebook about a model flood. Which line has the mistake?
- Line 3: a small sample can lose alleles and change their shares
- Line 1: a meadow of 1,000 plants cannot hold three alleles
- Line 2: a flood that favors no allele cannot leave a chance sample
- Line 4: a population that regrows regains the alleles it lost
Notebook
Notes on two meadows and wind-carried seeds (classmate's notebook), 4 lines. Columns: line, entry. Line 1: Meadow 1 had p = 0.7 for R with 500 alleles; meadow 2 had p = 0.1 with 300 alleles. Line 2: Wind carried seeds with 100 alleles, 70 of them R, from meadow 1 into meadow 2. Line 3: After the seedlings joined, meadow 2 had 100 R among 400 alleles, so p = 0.25. Line 4: So gene flow made the meadows more different, since meadow 2 changed.
Tala reads a classmate's notebook about two meadows and wind-carried seeds. Which line has the mistake?
- Line 1: 300 alleles at p = 0.1 hold 3 R alleles, not 30
- Line 4: gene flow made the meadows more alike, as the gap fell from 0.6 to 0.45
- Line 3: 100 R alleles among 400 alleles gives p = 0.4, so the stated 0.25 is a miscount
- Line 2: 100 alleles with 70 R alleles would give p = 0.07
A mainland meadow and a new island population started by 4 seeds (model data)
place alleles R alleles p for R mainland meadow 1,000 600 0.6 island founders 8 2 0.25 Zee reads the table. Which claim and reason fit it?
- The island matches the mainland, since the founders are a small copy of the whole meadow
- The island differs, since mutation changed R to W on the way
- The island differs, since the island favors W over R in each seed
- The island differs from the mainland, since 4 founders were a small chance sample
One plant leaves no seedlings in two populations (model data)
population plants alleles alleles from that plant share of the gene pool small 10 20 2 0.1 large 1,000 2,000 2 0.001 Esme reads the table. Which claim and reason fit it?
- Both populations keep the same alleles, since a smaller group is a copy of a larger one
- Chance changes the small gene pool more, since one plant is a larger share of it
- Chance changes the large gene pool more, since it has more plants to lose
- Chance moves both gene pools toward the better allele, since the weaker plant is lost
Alleles found in two meadows before and after seeds from meadow 1 arrive in meadow 2 (model data)
meadow before the seeds arrive after the seeds arrive meadow 1 R, W, Y R, W, Y meadow 2 R, W R, W, Y Noah sees allele Y appear in meadow 2 after wind carries in seeds from meadow 1. Which claim and reason fit the table?
- Gene flow brought Y and made the meadows more alike, since Y is now in both
- Genetic drift made Y in meadow 2, since chance creates new alleles
- Mutation made Y in meadow 2, since mutation is common in each generation
- Gene flow brought Y and made the meadows less alike, since new alleles add differences