Feedback loops: changes that grow or shrink themselves
Grade 9 Science Worksheet

Circle the best answer.
More carbon dioxide helps many plants grow more, and the extra growth takes some carbon dioxide back out of the air (NASA). What kind of loop is this, by Esme's reading?
- Positive, since it is good for plants
- Negative: it shrinks part of the rise
- Positive: carbon dioxide and plants both increase
- Negative: it removes the added carbon dioxide completely
Warmer air holds more water vapor, a greenhouse gas, which warms the air further. NASA estimates this more than doubles the warming from carbon dioxide alone. What kind of loop, by Jun's reading?
Loop diagram: warmer air → more water vapor → more heat trapped → warmer air. Loop diagram: warmer air → more water vapor → more heat trapped → warmer air. warmer air more water vapor more heat trapped warmer air - Not a feedback; water vapor is the original cause
- Negative: the extra vapor cancels the warming
- Negative, since more vapor is a bad thing
- Positive: it more than doubles the warming
“Loop diagram:” The ice-albedo loop has these links: temperature → sea ice (−); sea ice → sunlight absorbed (−); sunlight absorbed → temperature (+). What is the loop's sign, by Kira's count?
Loop diagram: temperature → sea ice (−) → sunlight absorbed (−) → temperature (+). Loop diagram: temperature → sea ice (−) → sunlight absorbed (−) → temperature (+). temperature sea ice sunlight absorbed (-) (-) (+) - Negative, since it has − links in it
- Positive, but just because one link is +
- Negative, since melting ice is bad
- Positive: two − links make the loop +
The plant loop has two links: carbon dioxide → plant growth (+); plant growth → carbon dioxide (−). What is the loop's sign, by Luz's count?
Loop diagram: carbon dioxide → plant growth (+) → carbon dioxide (−). Loop diagram: carbon dioxide → plant growth (+) → carbon dioxide (−). carbon dioxide plant growth (+) (-) - Positive, since it has a + link
- Positive, since plant growth is good
- Negative: one − link makes the loop −
- Negative, so carbon dioxide returns to its old level
A home heating loop: room temperature → thermostat calls for heat (−); call for heat → furnace output (+); furnace output → room temperature (+). What is its sign, by Milo's count?
Loop diagram: room temperature → thermostat calls for heat (−) → furnace output (+) → room temperature (+). Loop diagram: room temperature → thermostat calls for heat (−) → furnace output (+) → room temperature (+). room temperature thermostat calls for heat furnace output - + + - Negative: one − link makes the loop −
- Negative, so the room ends up colder than the setting
- Positive, since a warm home is good
- Positive: two + links outnumber one −
Sunlight of 200 W/m² falls on sea ice with an albedo of 0.6. How much does the ice absorb, by Noah's math?
Sunlight arrow of 200 W/m² hitting sea ice labeled albedo 0.6. Sunlight arrow of 200 W/m² hitting sea ice labeled albedo 0.6. Sunlight 200 W/m² sea ice albedo 0.6 - 120 W/m², the reflected part
- 0.4 W/m²
- 80 W/m²
- 200 W/m²
The same 200 W/m² falls on open ocean with an albedo of 0.06. How much does the ocean absorb, by Pia's math?
Sunlight arrow of 200 W/m² hitting open ocean labeled albedo 0.06. Sunlight arrow of 200 W/m² hitting open ocean labeled albedo 0.06. Sunlight 200 W/m² open ocean albedo 0.06 - 194 W/m²
- 80 W/m²
- 12 W/m², the reflected part
- 188 W/m²
That patch of sea ice (albedo 0.6) melts into open ocean (albedo 0.06) under the same 200 W/m². How does the energy it absorbs change, by Ren's math?
Two panels under 200 W/m² of sunlight: sea ice, albedo 0.6; open ocean, albedo 0.06. Two panels under 200 W/m² of sunlight: sea ice, albedo 0.6; open ocean, albedo 0.06. 200 W/m² sunlight 200 W/m² sunlight sea ice albedo 0.6 open ocean albedo 0.06 - 268 W/m² more is absorbed
- It absorbs the same amount
- 108 W/m² more is absorbed
- 108 W/m² less is absorbed
Read this first
Arctic in late summer (model data)
Year Sea ice (million km²) Air temperature change (°C) 1985 7.5 0.0 2005 5.9 0.9 2025 3.8 2.1 Which statement do the Arctic data support, by Tala's reading?
- The ice loss was the starting forcing in 1985
- More ice went along with warmer air
- Less ice went along with warmer Arctic air
- The data show a negative loop
Yearly carbon dioxide (model data)
Flow Units per year added by people 10 taken up by extra plant growth 3 People add 10 units of carbon dioxide a year; extra plant growth takes up 3 units. How does the plant loop change the yearly rise, by Zee's math?
- From 10 to 7 units, about 30% smaller
- From 10 to 13 units
- It does not change the rise
- From 10 to 0 units; the rise stops