Put rock layers in order
Grade 9 Science Worksheet - Challenge Me

Circle the best answer.
On card Y, Bo reads about basalt sheet B and its dike. Which statement is supported?
- Units 2 and 3 first; B and its dike next; Unit 4 last
- B flowed over Unit 2, and then Unit 3 was laid down on it
- Unit 4 formed before B, since Unit 4 holds basalt pebbles
- B came after Unit 4, since its dike reaches up to Unit 4
Read this first
Column Q (made up), bottom to top
Unit 1; Unit 2 with an ash bed dated 320 Ma; Unit 3; an erosion surface; Unit 4 with an ash bed dated 250 Ma. Dike D cuts Units 1 to 3, ends at the erosion surface, and is dated 280 Ma.
Using the dated ash beds and dike on card Q, what is the most time Esme can say is missing at the erosion surface?
- 30 million years, from the 320 Ma ash to the 280 Ma dike
- Exactly 70 million years, from the ash beds
- At most 70 million years, from the 320 Ma ash to the 250 Ma ash
- No time is missing: an erosion surface just marks a pause
NPS
At the Great Unconformity, rocks 1.75 billion years old lie under 510 million-year-old rocks. Elsewhere in the canyon, Supergroup rocks about 1.25 billion years old lie between them.
Kira's classmate says the Great Unconformity proves nothing happened on Earth for 1.2 billion years. Which reply is best?
- No: the gap is local; Supergroup rocks elsewhere fill part of it
- Yes: the schist and sandstone touch, so no time has passed
- Yes: no rocks formed anywhere during that long time
- No: the Supergroup rocks are older than the schist is
Table, Fossil ranges (made up), with columns Fossil, Time slices lived (1 oldest, 6 youngest), Where found
P, 1 to 4, worldwide; Q, 2 to 3, one basin only; R, 3 to 5, worldwide; S, 5, worldwide. Note: A time slice is one equal span of time.
A conglomerate holds limestone pebbles with fossil Q; its sandy matrix holds fossil S. Luz says it formed in slices 2 to 3. Best reply?
- Yes: Q is the older fossil, so it sets the rock's age
- No: it formed in slices 2 to 5, where either fossil lived
- Yes: fossils found inside a rock date that whole rock
- No: Q is in older pebbles; S in the matrix gives slice 5
Hill H (made up)
Units A, B and C lean 40 degrees to the east, with A lowest. A wavy erosion surface cuts across their tilted edges. Flat Units D and E lie on that surface, D below E. Dikes form upright. Dike X is upright and cuts Units A to C, ending at the wavy surface. Dike R cuts Units A to E.
Milo adds two dikes to hill H: upright X cuts A to C and ends at the wavy surface; R cuts A to E. Dikes form upright. Which order is right?
- Tilting, erosion, dike X, Units D and E, dike R
- Tilting, dike X, erosion, Units D and E, dike R
- Tilting, dike X, erosion, dike R, Units D and E
- Dike X, tilting, erosion, Units D and E, dike R
Table, Fossil ranges (made up), with columns Fossil, Time slices lived (1 oldest, 6 youngest), Where found
P, 1 to 4, worldwide; Q, 2 to 3, one basin only; R, 3 to 5, worldwide; S, 5, worldwide. Note: A time slice is one equal span of time.
Noah finds basalt sheet B between layer m (Q and R, below) and layer n (S, above). It baked both. When could B have formed?
- Slice 3, the age of layer m
- Slice 4 exactly, halfway between the layers
- Between slices 3 and 5, as the layers surround it
- Slice 5 or later, after layer n formed
Granite G, dated 1,700 Ma, holds chunks of schist. Sandstone about 510 Ma lies on the eroded granite. What can Pia say about the schist?
Made-up cross-section: granite dated 1,700 Ma holds chunks of schist; flat sandstone of about 510 Ma lies on the eroded granite. Made-up cross-section: granite dated 1,700 Ma holds chunks of schist; flat sandstone of about 510 Ma lies on the eroded granite. Made-up cross-section flat sandstone, about 510 Ma granite, dated 1,700 Ma chunks of schist eroded granite - The schist is younger than 1,700 Ma, since the granite surrounds it
- The schist is older than 1,700 Ma, as its chunks sit inside
- The schist is younger than 510 Ma, since the sandstone covers it
- The schist is exactly 1,700 Ma, the age of the granite
Layer X is older than layer Y at two sites. Ren's friend says X formed exactly 5 million years before Y. What would test that?
Claim: layer X is older than layer Y at two sites, and formed exactly 5 million years before it. Claim: layer X is older than layer Y at two sites, and formed exactly 5 million years before it. Claim: layer X is older than layer Y at two sites formed exactly 5 million years before it site 1 site 2 layer Y layer X layer Y layer X - Radiometric dates from ash or igneous rock around each layer
- Check that X lies below Y at a third distant site
- Count the fossils in each layer and compare the counts
- Measure the thickness of rock between X and Y
Table, Fossil ranges (made up), with columns Fossil, Time slices lived (1 oldest, 6 youngest), Where found
P, 1 to 4, worldwide; Q, 2 to 3, one basin only; R, 3 to 5, worldwide; S, 5, worldwide. Note: A time slice is one equal span of time.
Two cliffs each have a limestone. Cliff 1's holds fossil Q; Cliff 2's holds fossil S. Tala says they match. Does the evidence support that?
- Cannot tell: fossils cannot be used to date limestone
- Yes: the same rock type means the same age everywhere
- Yes: both limestones lie at the same height in their cliffs
- No: Q marks slices 2 to 3 and S marks slice 5
Zee claims the erosion surface under Unit 4 formed between 190 Ma and 160 Ma. Which new finding would most weaken the claim?
Column N (made up), bottom to top: Unit 1; Unit 2 with an ash bed dated 212 million years (Ma); Unit 3; Unit 4 with an ash bed dated 160 Ma. Dike D cuts Units 1 to 3, ends at an erosion surface under Unit 4, and is dated 190 Ma. Column N (made up), bottom to top: Unit 1; Unit 2 with an ash bed dated 212 million years (Ma); Unit 3; Unit 4 with an ash bed dated 160 Ma. Dike D cuts Units 1 to 3, ends at an erosion surface under Unit 4, and is dated 190 Ma. Column N (made up) Unit 4 Unit 3 Unit 2 Unit 1 erosion surface ash bed dated 212 Ma ash bed dated 160 Ma Dike D dated 190 Ma - Another dike like D found in Unit 2
- A fossil in Unit 4 that also lived during Unit 3 times
- A new date of 185 Ma for dike D
- A re-dating of dike D to 150 Ma, younger than the ash