Digital and analog signals
Grade 8 Science Worksheet - Challenge Me
Circle the best answer, or write your answer on the line.
Ari's recorder takes 2000 samples a second at 8 bits each and records 6 seconds. A link sends 8000 bits each second. How many seconds to send it all?
Bo's phone records 5 seconds at 1000 samples a second, 16 bits each. A weak connection sends 4000 bits each second. How many seconds to send the clip?
Esme's mic takes 4000 samples a second at 8 bits each and records 3 seconds. The link sends 16000 bits each second. How many seconds to send it all?
Read this first
Use this
Cable noise (example data). Pulses are sent as 0 or 1. The cable adds noise of up to 0.3, up or down. The receiver reads above 0.5 as 1 and below 0.5 as 0.
A cable adds noise of up to 0.3, up or down, to each pulse. Full pulse is 1, empty is 0. Can it make the receiver misread a bit, Jun?
- No, since a 0 stays at most 0.3 and a 1 at least 0.7
- Yes, since 0.3 is more than the 0 that was originally sent
- No, since digital signals cannot be misread
- Yes, since any noise changes the pulse heights
Use this
Cable noise (example data). Pulses are sent as 0 or 1. The cable adds noise of up to 0.6, up or down. The receiver reads above 0.5 as 1 and below 0.5 as 0.
A different cable adds noise of up to 0.6, up or down. Full pulse is 1, empty is 0. Can it make the receiver misread a bit, Kira?
- Yes, but a 1 is the sole pulse that can be misread
- No, since the receiver ignores noise
- No, since 0.6 is still less than a full pulse of 1.0
- Yes, since a 0 pushed up by 0.6 reads above 0.5
Lab report, Copying a recording (example data)
[1] Ren's class compared two ways of copying one recording. [2] They copied an analog tape, then copied that copy, and kept going until they had five generations. [3] They also copied a digital file five times in a row. [4] After each copy, they measured how far the result differed from the original. [5] The tape's difference grew with every generation: 2%, 4%, 7%, 11% and 16%. [6] The digital file's difference stayed at 0% for all five copies. [7] Noise explains the tape results, because each copy added small random changes that the next copy kept as part of its shape. [8] A digital receiver only decides whether each pulse is closer to 0 or to 1, so small changes were thrown away at every step. [9] The class noted that a very noisy cable could still make a receiver misread a pulse, which would flip a bit.
A classmate says digital copies can never contain an error. Which sentence limits that claim, Milo?
- Sentence 6
- Sentence 7
- Sentence 8
- Sentence 9
Another class uses a very noisy cable and finds its digital copies differ by 8%. Does that contradict the report, Pia?
- No, since sentence 9 says strong noise can flip bits
- Yes, since sentence 6 says digital copies stay at 0%
- Cannot tell, since the report does not mention any cable
- Yes, since digital signals ignore noise of any size
Use this
Investigation card (test results). Changed: kind of copy and recording (a rock song on tape, a spoken story as a digital file). Measured: difference from the original (%). Kept the same: 3 copies made, same room. Tape copy of the rock song: 7. Digital copy of the spoken story: 0.
Ren says this test proves tape copies are worse than digital ones. What is wrong with the test?
- Two things changed, so the recording could explain it
- Three copies is too many for a fair test
- Digital files cannot be measured against the original
- The test should have used a different room for each copy made
Use this
Investigation card (test results). Changed: kind of copy (tape or digital file). Measured: difference from the original (%). Kept the same: same recording, same room, 1 copy made of each. Tape: 2. Digital file: 0.
Tala says tape copies are only 2% worse, so noise barely matters. Why can't this test show that?
- The recording was the same for both, which is not fair
- It checked one copy; analog noise builds up over many
- Tape is exactly 2% worse, in any test
- A digital file should have been measured at 2% too
Use this
Investigation card (test results). Changed: cable length. Measured: bits misread out of 1000 sent. Kept the same: same signal, same receiver, one trial per cable. 5 m: 0. 50 m: 1. 200 m: 3.
Zee says longer cables always cause more errors. How strong is the evidence from this one test?
- Strong: the counts rise with length, so the claim is proven
- Weak: tiny counts from one trial each, so repeat it
- Useless: digital signals cannot be misread
- Strong: digital errors come from long cables alone