Fact, opinion and loaded words in writing about the past
Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Challenge Me
Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Ratifying the Constitution, 1787 to 1788. Card A, an essay (Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 1, October 27, 1787; one of 85 essays signed "Publius" for New York newspapers to persuade voters to ratify the Constitution; spelling modernized; cuts marked): "… the obvious interest of a certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power, emolument, and consequence of the offices they hold under the State establishments … To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives." Card B, a summary in our words: opponents of the Constitution, called Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and George Mason, argued that it gave too much power to a distant national government and had no bill of rights. Card C, a summary in our words: the Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, and needed nine of the 13 states to ratify. New Hampshire was the ninth, on June 21, 1788. Congress proposed a Bill of Rights in 1789, and the states ratified it in 1791.
Hamilton warns against 'the bitterness of their invectives.' Which phrase in card A suggests he also questions his opponents' motives, Ari asks?
- 'By the loudness of their declamations'
- 'To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties'
- 'Hope to evince the justness of their opinions'
- 'The obvious interest of a certain class of men'
Hamilton wrote to persuade New York voters. How does that affect the way Bo reads card A?
- His warning means the essay can simply be ignored by historians
- His warning shows that both sides were equally honest in 1787
- He warns against loud words yet frames foes as self-interested
- His warning shows that he used no persuasion himself in the essay
Card B gives the opponents' main reasons. How do they compare with the motive Hamilton names, Esme asks?
- They show that Hamilton's claim about motives must be false
- They differ: opponents cite power and missing rights
- They match: opponents said they feared losing their offices
- They match: the opponents wrote under the name Publius too
Card C says a Bill of Rights followed in 1789 to 1791. What does that suggest about the opponents' argument, Jun asks?
- It shows the opponents were right on their other points too
- It shows that the opponents' motives were purely selfish ones
- It shows that the Constitution failed to be ratified in 1788
- Concern about missing rights led to amendments
A student writes: 'Hamilton proved the opponents wanted power.' Which revision best fits the evidence, Kira asks?
- Hamilton argued some guarded offices, but B shows other reasons
- Card B confirmed that Hamilton's claim about offices was true
- Hamilton showed that no opponent held any good reason to object
- Card C showed the opponents wanted a bill of rights for power
How should Luz treat both sides' words, using all three cards?
- Weigh evidence and note loaded words, since both wanted to win
- Trust whichever side used the calmer words and kinder tone
- Ignore both sides, since each of them argued from a view
- Trust the side that won the vote to ratify the Constitution
Use this
Starting a war with Mexico, 1845 to 1846. Card D, a message to Congress (President James K. Polk, May 11, 1846; spelling modernized; a cut is marked): "… Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil." Card E, an article (John L. O'Sullivan, 'Annexation,' United States Magazine and Democratic Review, July-August 1845, about Texas; modernized): "… the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions." Card F, a summary in our words from the National Archives and the Library of Congress: the United States annexed Texas in 1845. Texas said its southern border was the Rio Grande, while Mexico said the border was the Nueces River, farther north. In 1846 American troops entered the land between the two rivers. On April 25, 1846, 11 American soldiers were killed in a clash there. Congress declared war on May 13, 1846. In 1847 Representative Abraham Lincoln asked Polk to name the exact spot where American blood had been shed.
Polk's message says the clash was 'upon the American soil.' Which part of that claim depended on a disputed fact, Milo asks?
- Whether Congress had the power to declare war on any nation
- Whether the United States had annexed Texas in the year 1845
- Whether any American soldiers had lost their lives
- Whether the spot lay inside American territory
Which wording in card E works as persuasion rather than evidence, Noah asks?
- 'Allotted by Providence,' which frames expansion as destiny
- 'July-August 1845,' which gives a date that can be checked
- 'About Texas,' which names a region that can be mapped
- 'The continent,' which names a place that can be located
Does card F support Polk's phrase 'American soil,' Pia asks?
- No: it says that Texas was a Mexican state in the year 1846
- No: it says that no American soldiers lost their lives there
- Fully: it confirms the border as American in each respect
- Partly: it confirms the deaths but shows a disputed area
Who would more likely call the American army's move into the land between the rivers an 'invasion,' and why, Tala asks?
- British leaders, who held that Texas was theirs
- American leaders, who held that the land was theirs
- Mexican leaders, who held that the land was theirs
- Texan farmers, who held that the Nueces was the border
