Fact, opinion and loaded words in writing about the past
Grade 8 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence

Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
Sentences about the Stamp Act. Card A, sentences we wrote to practice (the facts in them are true): [1] In March 1765 Parliament passed the Stamp Act. [2] It was the most unfair tax ever put on Americans. [3] It taxed newspapers, legal papers and playing cards sold in the colonies. [4] Greedy politicians in London cooked up the scheme to rob honest colonists. [5] Colonists protested, and Parliament repealed the law in March 1766. [6] Everyone in the colonies must have been furious. Card B, a summary in our words from the Library of Congress and the National Archives: Parliament passed the Stamp Act in March 1765 to raise money after the Seven Years' War. It required a tax stamp on printed paper such as newspapers, legal documents and playing cards. Colonists protested and boycotted British goods, and Parliament repealed the act in March 1766.
Sentence 2 calls the Stamp Act 'the most unfair tax ever.' Why is that an opinion, Ari asks?
- It contains no word that people could ever disagree about
- It has a date that no record can confirm
- It names a law that is not in card B
- 'Most unfair' is a judgment that no record can settle
What do the loaded words in sentence 4 do to a reader, Bo asks?
- Show that the colonists were honest and the tax a crime
- Give the reader the date of the vote so it can be checked
- Push the reader to blame London before checking facts
- Show that Parliament passed a tax on printed paper
Which version of sentence 4 keeps its fact but drops the loaded words, Esme asks?
- Tax collectors in the colonies robbed colonists of paper
- Brave leaders in London protected the colonies with a tax
- The colonists were forced by law to read newspapers
- Parliament, in London, passed a tax on the colonies
Sentence 3 says the law taxed newspapers, legal papers and playing cards. Does card B support it, Jun asks?
- Yes, card B lists newspapers, legal documents and cards
- Cannot tell, since card B does not name the taxed goods
- No, card B says the tax was on tea, sugar and molasses
- No, card B lists just newspapers, and no other printed goods
Sentence 6 says everyone in the colonies must have been furious. What is wrong with it as a claim about the past, Kira asks?
- It uses a number of protesters that cannot be checked
- It claims to know how everyone felt, without evidence
- It gives a date for the protests that card B contradicts
- It describes a law that Parliament did not actually pass
Sentence 4 mixes a checkable fact with loaded words. Which fact is inside it, Luz asks?
- People in London made the tax
- The colonists were honest
- The law was cooked up secretly
- The tax was a scheme to rob
Use this
Two headlines about the same law. Card C, a headline we wrote to practice: "PARLIAMENT BRAVELY PROTECTS THE COLONIES WITH NEW STAMP LAW". Card D, a headline we wrote to practice: "LONDON TYRANTS GRAB COLONISTS' MONEY WITH STAMP TAX". Card E, a summary in our words: Parliament passed the Stamp Act in March 1765. It put a tax on printed paper in the colonies.
Both headlines report the same event. Which fact do they share, Milo asks?
- Parliament passed a stamp tax
- The tax was fair to the colonies
- The tax protected the colonies from harm
- The tax was a robbery of the colonists
Which headline would a colonist who opposed the law be more likely to print, and which clue shows it, Noah asks?
- Card D, because 'tyrants' and 'grab' attack Parliament
- Card D, because it includes the date of the law
- Card C, because 'bravely' and 'protects' attack Parliament
- Card C, because it names Parliament in capital letters
Which headline is closest to neutral, Ren asks?
- Parliament Boldly Taxes Defenseless Colonists' Paper Goods
- Parliament Passes a Tax on Printed Paper in the Colonies
- Parliament Wisely Raises Money for the Empire's Defense
- Colonists Stunned by Cruel Paper Tax from London
A reader sees only card D. What is the risk, Tala asks?
- Believing the headline has too many words in capitals
- Believing that Parliament did not pass the Stamp Act itself
- Believing the law protected the colonies, as card D claims
- Believing the law was tyranny without the facts

