Decide which cause mattered most, and say why
Grade 7 Social Studies Worksheet - Building Confidence
Circle the best answer.
Read this first
Use this
The Great Fire of London, 1666 (cards A to C; summaries in our words). Card A, the diary of Samuel Pepys, a navy official who watched the fire, written in September 1666: he wrote that a strong wind drove the flames, that the houses were old timber ones built close together, and that officials at first did little to stop it. Card B, a museum summary: the fire began on the night of September 2, 1666, at a baker's shop in Pudding Lane, and burned for four days. It destroyed about 13,200 houses and 87 parish churches. Card C, the Rebuilding Act of 1667: new houses in London had to be built of brick or stone, and the main streets were to be widened.
Pepys watched the fire. What is the value of card A, and its limit, Ari asks?
- He was a navy official, so his diary cannot tell us about a fire
- He saw it as it happened, but he wrote from one person's view
- He saw it as it happened, so he knew each cause of the fire
- He wrote years afterward, so he could judge which cause mattered most
Which cause started the fire, and which helped it spread, Bo asks?
- The baker's shop started it; wind and close timber houses spread it
- Pepys started it, and the officials helped it spread
- The wind started it, and the baker's shop helped it spread
- The Rebuilding Act started it, and the timber houses helped it spread
A student says, "Card B shows the baker's shop was the only cause of the damage." How strong is that claim, Esme asks?
- Weak: card B names the start, and card A names causes of its spread
- Weak: a museum summary cannot say where the fire began
- Strong: card B says the baker caused the fire on purpose
- Strong: the fire began at the baker's shop, so nothing else mattered
What does card C show that lawmakers learned from the fire, Kira asks?
- That bakers had set the fire on purpose and should be punished
- That brick and stone were cheaper than timber
- That timber houses close together made a fire easier to spread
- That the wind was the sole cause and could not be helped
How do cards A and C fit together, Luz asks?
- They do not fit, because a diary and a law are not the same kind of source
- Pepys blames the wind, and the law blames the baker
- The law shows that Pepys was right about each cause of the fire
- Pepys names timber houses close together, and the law changes both
A student says, "Card A proves the officials started the fire." How strong is that claim, Noah asks?
- Weak: card A says officials did little to stop it, not that they started it
- Strong: Pepys was a navy official, so he knew who began it
- Strong: card A says the officials did little, so they must have begun it themselves
- Weak: card A is one man's diary, so it says nothing about officials
About 13,200 houses burned in four days. About how many houses burned each day on average, Pia asks?
- About 330 houses
- About 4,400 houses
- About 3,300 houses
- About 52,800 houses
About 13,200 houses burned in four days. At the same pace, about how many would burn in six days, Ren asks?
- About 26,400 houses
- About 15,200 houses
- About 19,800 houses
- About 1,980 houses
What changed in London's rules after the fire, Tala asks?
- New houses had to be built of timber, and main streets were narrowed
- Timber was banned in any building and bakers were sent out of London
- Nothing changed, because London had followed brick and stone rules before
- New houses had to be built of brick or stone, and main streets were widened
Using cards A and B, which pair of causes helped the fire spread, Zee asks?
- A strong wind and old timber houses built close together
- A baker's shop in Pudding Lane and the date of September 2
- A strong wind and the Rebuilding Act of 1667 for new houses
- Wide streets and brick houses near the river and the bridge
